Fiscal policy for a new post-pandemic COVID-19 welfare regime based on Good Living
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/IREP.5.1.26975Abstract
The great impacts from the COVID-19 health pandemic showed the economistic and instrumentalist limits of fiscal policy, which was overwhelmed by the disruptive crisis in all the countries of the world. In addition, there are great challenges to face climate change. In this context, the main objective of this work is to analyze and propose a set of principles and instruments that should characterize fiscal policy to achieve a new welfare regime called Good Living, which in turn comprises three fundamental elements: i) biocentric sustainability, ii) social equity and, iii) personal satisfaction. The methodology used is basically a bibliographic review under the cross- reference technique, on the concepts of welfare regime and Good Living. It reviews the main fiscal proposals from both the new macroeconomic consensus, as well as the so- called macroeconomics for development and the counter-cyclical fiscal policy from ECLAC. Main conclusions: fiscal policy for Good Living changes the instrumentalist fiscal vision and relates it to a broad and integrated vision in the social, economic and environmental spheres, but without neglecting the criteria of sustainability of the processes through the generation of adequate income and financing, therefore, it would have a higher level than the approaches of the mainstream and Latin American neostructuralism.
Downloads
References
Acosta, Alberto. 2013. Buen Vivir / Sumak kawsay. Una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Barcelona: Icaria.
Arestis, Philip. 2009. “New Consensus Macroeconomics: A Critical Appraisal”. Working Paper No. 54. The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, University of Cambridge.
Arestis, Philip. (ed.). 2007. Is There a New Consensus in Macroeconomics? Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Arrizabalo, Xavier. 2014. Capitalismo y Economía Mundial. Madrid: Instituto Marxista de Economía.
BID (Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo). 2018. Mejor gasto para mejores vidas: cómo América Latina y el Caribe puede hacer más con menos. Editado por Alejandro Izquierdo, Carola Pessino y Guillermo Vuletin.
Blanchard, Oliver. 2009. “The state of macro”. Annual Review of Economics, 1, pp. 209–228 Blanchard, Olivier y Lawrence Summers. 2017, “Rethinking stabilization policy: back to the
future”, documento preparado para la conferencia Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy, Washington, D.C., Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), 12 a 13 de octubre. Acceso el 7 de marzo de 2022 https://piie.com/system/files/documents/blanchard-summers20171012paper.pdf
CAF (Banco de Desarrollo de América Latina). 2018. Finanzas públicas para el desarrollo: Fortaleciendo la conexión entre ingresos y gastos. Serie Reporte de Economía y Desarrollo.
CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina). 2022. Panorama Fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe. Desafíos de la política fiscal para un desarrollo sostenible e inclusivo. Santiago de Chile.
CEPAL. 2020. Informe Especial No.5. Enfrentar los efectos cada vez mayores del COVID-19 para una reactivación con igualdad: nuevas proyecciones. Santiago de Chile.
CEPAL. 2019. Panorama Fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe. Políticas tributarias para la movilización de recursos en el marco de la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. Santiago de Chile.
CEPAL. 2018a. Panorama Fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe. (LC/PUB.2018/4-P). Santiago de Chile.
CEPAL. 2018b. La ineficiencia de la desigualdad. (LC/SES.37/3-P). Santiago de Chile.
CEPAL. 2017. Panorama Fiscal de América Latina y el Caribe. La movilización de recursos para el financiamiento del desarrollo sostenible. Santiago de Chile.
CEPAL. 2015. Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe. Desafíos para impulsar el ciclo de inversión con miras a reactivar el crecimiento. Santiago de Chile
Cubillo-Guevara, Ana Patricia y Antonio Luis Hidalgo-Capitán, Santiago García Álvarez. 2016. “El Buen Vivir como alternativa al desarrollo para América Latina”. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios del Desarrollo 5(2): 30-57
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1993. Los tres mundos del estado de bienestar. Valencia: Alfons el Mananim.
Eyraud, Luc, Xavier Debrun, Andrew Hodge, Victor Lledó y Catherine Pattill (2018). “Second- Generation Fiscal Rules: Balancing Simplicity, Flexibility, and Enforceability”. IMF Staff Discussion Note. SDN/18/04.
FMI (Fondo Monetario Internacional). 2018. World Economic Outlook (WEO). Washigton.
FMI. 2015. Fiscal Monitor. Now Is the Time: Fiscal Policies for Sustainable Growth. Washington, D.C., abril.
FMI. 2014, “Fiscal policy and income inequality”. IMF Policy Paper.
Gudynas, Eduardo (2010). “La senda biocéntrica”. Tabula Rasa 13: 45-71.
Hidalgo-Capitán, Antonio Luis, Ana Patricia Cubillo-Guevara, Santiago García Álvarez y Nancy Medina. 2018. Los Objetivos del Buen Vivir a escala global. Una crítica de los objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible y una propuesta alternativa transmoderna. Huelva – España: Ediciones Bonanza.
Hidalgo-Capitán, Antonio Luis y Ana Patricia Cubillo-Guevara. 2014. “Seis debates abiertos sobre el sumak kawsay”. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 48 (enero): 25-40.
García Álvarez, Santiago. 2016. Sumak Kawsay o Buen Vivir como Alternativa al Desarrollo en Ecuador. Aplicación y Resultados en el Gobierno de Rafael Correa (2007-2014). Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar y Ediciones Abya Yala.
Krugman, Paul. 2012. ¡Acabad ya con esta crisis¡ Madrid: Editorial Planeta.
Lavoie, Mark. 2016. “Rethinking macroeconomic theory before the next crisis”. Institute for New Economic Thinking.
Lavoie, Mark. 2009. Introduction to Pos Keynesian Economics. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan Nachane, Dilip. 2013. “Global Crisis and the New Consensus Macroeconomics: End of ´Paradigmatic Determinism?´” Economic and Political Weekly. Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 43- 50.
Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria. 2019. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Releases Green New Deal Outline. Acceso el 7 de marzo de 2022 https://www.npr.org/2019/02/07/691997301/rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-releases-green-new-deal-outline
Pollin, Robert. 2015. Greening the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Robeyns, Ingrid. 2014. “Having too much”. En Wealth, editado por J. Knight y M. Schwarzberg. Nomos LVI. New York: NYU Press: 1-44
Rochon, Louis Philippe. 2018. “El estado de la macroeconomía”. Ola Financiera, Vol. 11 (No. 31) Septiembre - diciembre.
Sen, Amartya. 2007. Identidad y violencia. La ilusión del destino. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores.
Sen, Amartya. 2000. Desarrollo y Libertad. Barcelona: Planeta.
Sen, Amartya. 1989. Sobre ética y economía. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Taylor, Paul. 1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environment Ethic. Princetone NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thompson, Neil. 2016. Anti-Discriminatory practice: Equality, Diversity and Social Justice.
Basingstoke, Reino Unido: Palgrave Macmillan.
Unión Europea (UE). 2017. “Vade Mecum on the Stability and Growth Pact”. Institutional Paper 052 – March 2017. European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Acceso el 7 de julio de 2022 http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/
Villagómez, Francisco Alejandro. 2014. El enfoque de la perspectiva de derechos en la política fiscal: construcción de un marco metodológico para aplicarse en México y países seleccionados de Centroamérica. Sede Subregional CEPAL en México.
Wray, Louis Randall. 2012. Modern Money Theory; A Primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract880
-
PDF (Español)320
Issue
Section
License
Copyright is the right exercised by the creator over his/her literary and artistic work. The owner of the copyright is, as a rule, the person who creates the work, which is to say the author. In Copyright Law, the author is considered to be “the natural person who creates a literary, artistic or scientific piece of work”. Although in principle it is only natural or physical persons who may be considered to be authors, the law foresaw certain cases in which legal persons could also benefit from these rights.
Authorship is irrevocable; it may not be transmitted either inter vivos or in the form of a testamentary trust; it does not disappear with the passage of time nor is it public domain; it is not subject to the statute of limitations.
Copyright Law has a dual nature; it covers moral rights (paternity, integrity, dissemination…), and property rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation):
Moral rights (article 14 of the Spanish Copyright Law). These refer to acknowledgement of authorship. They are irrevocable and inalienable and correspond to the right to:
- Decide whether his/her work is to be disseminated and how.
- Acknowledge authorship of the work.
- Demand respect for the integrity of the work.
- Modify the work while being respectful of the rights acquired.
- Withdraw the work from sale, without prejudice to compensation for damages to the owners of the right of use.
- Access the single,unique copy of the work that is held by a third party
Property rights (articles 18 to 25 of the Spanish Copyright Law). They refer to the four types of right of use. They allow the owner of the work to obtain financial compensation for the third-party use of his/her work:
- Reproduction: obtaining of copies of all or part of the work.
- Distribution: the public availability of the work through its sale, rental, loan or by any other means.
- Public Communication: action through which a group of people may have access to the work.
- Transformation: the translation, adaptation and any other modification of the work, leading, or not, to new work derived from it.