Do analysts forecast differently in periods of uncertainty? An empirical analysis of target prices for Spanish banks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/IREP.5.1.26978Abstract
Target prices are an estimation of the future value of a company’s stock price. Although there is a general consensus about the importance of firm’s fundamentals when forecasting, there are also other determinants. This article sheds light on the effects of uncertainty, financial stress and volatility on target price estimations. To do so, different indicators are elaborated for the eight main Spanish financial entities from 1999 to 2020. They show that, on average, analysts have an optimistic bias in their valuations, and tend to react with a delay to stock movements. The different measures of uncertainty, financial stress and volatility affect their estimations a) fostering the optimistic bias, b) reducing the speed and c) willingness of the adjustment to share price movements, and d) make them trust less on stock prices as indicators of banks’ fundamentals. These effects are reinforced by the aggregation method of the composite target price (in particular the role of the older individual contributions). Both factors work in tandem: as the more uncertain the economic and financial environment is, the less likely aggregate target prices would move according to stock prices, because older individual contributions will slow the adjustment process. A simple change in the aggregation method reduces its impact on the indicators, without substantially altering their conclusions.
Downloads
References
Arand, D., and A. G. Kerl (2012). Sell-Side Analyst Research and Reported Conflicts of Interest, European Financial Management, 21(1), pp. 20-51.
Asquith, P., M. B. Mikhail and A. S. Au (2005). Information content of equity analyst Reports, Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2), pp. 245-282.
Bae, K.-H., R. Stulz and H. Tan (2008). Do local analysts know more? A cross-country study of the performance of local analysts and foreign analysts, Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), pp. 581-606.
Bagnoli, M. E., M. B. Clement, M. J. Crawley and S. G. Watts (2009). The Profitability of Analysts’ Stock Recommendations: What Role Does Investor Sentiment Play?, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Baker, M., and J. Wurgler (2007). Investor sentiment and the stock market, Journal of Economic Perpectives, 21(2), pp. 129-151.
Baker, M., N. Bloom and S. J. Davis (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), pp. 1593-1636.
Bilinski, P., D. Lyssimachou and M. Walker (2013). Target price accuracy: International evidence, The Accounting Review, 88(3), pp. 825-851.
Bilinski, P., D. Cumming, L. H. Hass and K. Stathopoulos (2015). Strategic Distortions in Analyst Target Prices in the Presence of Short-Term Institutional Investors, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Bonini, S., L. Zanetti, R. Bianchini and A. Salvi (2010). Target Price Accuracy in Equity Research, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(9‐10), pp. 1177-1217.
Bradshaw, M. T. (2002). The use of target prices to justify sell-side analysts' stock Recommendations, Accounting Horizons, 16(1).
Bradshaw, M. T. (2011). Analysts’ Forecasts: What Do We Know after Decades of Work?, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Bradshaw, M. T., A. G. Huang and H. Tan (2012). Analyst Target Price Optimism around the World, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Bradshaw, M. T., L. D. Brown and K. Huang (2013). Do sell-side analysts exhibit differential target price forecasting ability?, Review of Accounting Studies, 18(4).
Bradshaw, M. T., A. G. Huang and H. Tan (2019). The Effects of Analyst‐Country Institutions on Biased Research: Evidence from Target Prices, Journal of Accounting Research, 57(1), pp. 85-120.
Brav, A., and R. Lehavy (2003). An empirical analysis of analysts' target prices: Shortterm informativeness and long-term dynamics, Journal of Finance, 58(5), pp. 1933-1968.
Brown, L. D., A. C. Call, M. B. Clement and N. Y. Sharp (2015). Inside the ‘Black Box’ of Sell- Side Financial Analysts, Journal of Accounting Research, 53(1).
Clarkson, P., A. Nekrasov, A. Simon and I. Tutticci (2013). Target price forecasts: The roles of the 52‐week high price and recent investor sentiment, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 47(9-10), Pp. 1365-1399.
Clement, M. B., and S. Y. Tse (2005). Financial analyst characteristics and herding behavior in forecasting, The Journal of Finance, 60(1), pp. 307-341.
Cowen, A., B. Groysberg and P. Healy (2006). Which types of analyst firms are more optimistic?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(2006), pp. 119-146.
Da, Z., K. P. Hong and S. Lee (2016). What drives target price forecasts and their investment value?, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43(3-4), pp. 487-510.
Fama, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices, Journal of Business, 38(1), pp. 34- 105.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work, Journal of Finance, 25(2), pp. 383-417.
Ghirelli, C., J. J. Pérez and A. Urtasun (2019). A new economic policy uncertainty index for Spain, Economics Letters, 182(2019), pp. 64-67.
Gleason, C., W. Johnson and H. Li (2013). Valuation model use and the price target performance of sell-side equity analysts, Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), pp. 80-115.
González-Pérez, M. T., and A. Novales (2011). The information content in a volatility index for Spain, SERIEs, 2(2011), pp. 185-216.
Heath, C., S. Huddart and M. Lang (1999). Psychological Factors and Stock Option Exercise, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), pp. 601-627.
Ho, T. Q., N. Strong and M. Walker (2018). Modelling analysts’ target price revisions following good and bad news?, Accounting and Business Research, 48(1), pp. 37-61.
Holló, D., M. Kremer and M. Lo Duca (2012). CISS – A Composite Indicator of Systemic Stress in the Financial System, European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1426.
Hribar, P., and J. Mcinnis (2012). Investor sentiment and analyst´s earnings forecast errors, Management Science (Special Issue on Behavioral Economics and Finance), 58(2), pp. 293-307.
Huang, R., M. M. Krishnan, J. Shon and P. Zhou (2017). Who herds? Who doesn’t? Estimates of analysts’ herding propensity in forecasting earnings, Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 374-399.
Jegadeesh, N., J. Kim, S. D. Krische and C. M. C. Lee (2004). Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value?, The Journal of the American Finance Association, 59(3), 1083-1124.
Jegadeesh, N., and W. Kim (2010). Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions, The Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), pp. 901-937.
Ke, B., and Y. Yu (2009). Why don't analysts use their earnings forecasts in generating stock recommendations?, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Li, X., H. Feng, S. Yan and H. Wang (2021). Dispersion in analysts’ target prices and stock returns, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 56, 101385.
Mehran, H., and R. Stulz (2007). The economics of conflicts of interest in financial institutions, Journal of Financial Economics, 85, pp. 267-296.
Moreira, R., L. Cardoso, R. Confetti and V. Medeiros (2017). Analysts´ Consensus and Target Price Accuracy: A Study in Latin America, Brazilian Administration Review, 14(4).
Palley, A., T. D. Steffen and F. Zhang (2019). Consensus Analyst Target Prices: Information Content and Implications for Investors, Working paper, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, 185(1974), pp. 1124-1131.
Zuckerman, R. (2009). Investor overconfidence, turnover, volatility and the disposition effect: A study based on price target updates, SSRN Electronic Journal.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract336
-
PDF58
Issue
Section
License
Copyright is the right exercised by the creator over his/her literary and artistic work. The owner of the copyright is, as a rule, the person who creates the work, which is to say the author. In Copyright Law, the author is considered to be “the natural person who creates a literary, artistic or scientific piece of work”. Although in principle it is only natural or physical persons who may be considered to be authors, the law foresaw certain cases in which legal persons could also benefit from these rights.
Authorship is irrevocable; it may not be transmitted either inter vivos or in the form of a testamentary trust; it does not disappear with the passage of time nor is it public domain; it is not subject to the statute of limitations.
Copyright Law has a dual nature; it covers moral rights (paternity, integrity, dissemination…), and property rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation):
Moral rights (article 14 of the Spanish Copyright Law). These refer to acknowledgement of authorship. They are irrevocable and inalienable and correspond to the right to:
- Decide whether his/her work is to be disseminated and how.
- Acknowledge authorship of the work.
- Demand respect for the integrity of the work.
- Modify the work while being respectful of the rights acquired.
- Withdraw the work from sale, without prejudice to compensation for damages to the owners of the right of use.
- Access the single,unique copy of the work that is held by a third party
Property rights (articles 18 to 25 of the Spanish Copyright Law). They refer to the four types of right of use. They allow the owner of the work to obtain financial compensation for the third-party use of his/her work:
- Reproduction: obtaining of copies of all or part of the work.
- Distribution: the public availability of the work through its sale, rental, loan or by any other means.
- Public Communication: action through which a group of people may have access to the work.
- Transformation: the translation, adaptation and any other modification of the work, leading, or not, to new work derived from it.