Beyond counting species: A new way to look at biodiversity

Authors

  • Cristina Llopis-Belenguer Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Valencia (Spain).
  • Isabel Blasco-Costa Natural History Museum of Geneva (Switzerland).
  • Juan Antonio Balbuena Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Valencia (Spain).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.9.11186

Keywords:

classical diversity indexes, functional diversity, phylogenetic diversity, functional traits, genetic distances

Abstract

In modern ecology, the traditional diversity indices (usually of richness, abundance, and species evenness) have been highly revealing and useful for monitoring community and ecosystem processes. However, around two decades ago, a pioneering research team noticed that these indices did not completely resolve their open questions. Thus, they suggested changing the way biodiversity was measured. At its base, this new methodology considers the distance between species (in phylogenetic or functional terms) before subsequently applying the appropriate biodiversity indices. Including phylogenetic and functional elements in the evaluation of diversity allows us to approach the concept of biodiversity in a more comprehensive way. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cristina Llopis-Belenguer, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Valencia (Spain).

Researcher at the Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Valencia (Spain). She is a graduate in Biology with a Master’s Degree in Biodiversity: Conservation and Evolution. She is currently researching for her PhD in functional and phylogenetic diversity in fish parasite communities on a predoctoral contract (ACIF/2016/374) funded by the Valencian Department of Education and the European Social Fund (ESF).

Isabel Blasco-Costa, Natural History Museum of Geneva (Switzerland).

PhD in Biology and researcher at the Natural History Museum of Geneva (Switzerland). She researches the taxonomy, phylogeography, and evolutionary ecology of trematodes and monogeneans and is particularly interested in the life cycle of trematodes, their ecological and evolutionary interactions with their hosts, and how that influences the genetics and evolution of these parasites’ populations.

Juan Antonio Balbuena, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Valencia (Spain).

PhD in Biology and researcher at the Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Valencia (Spain). Taking an ecology-evolution approach, he studies parasite-host relationships and other symbiotic associations from the point of view of cophylogeny, parasite community ecology, and the phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships of the genus Ligophorus .

References

Carmona, C. P., De Bello, F., Mason, N. W. H., & Lepš, J. (2016). Traits without borders: Integrating functional diversity across scales. Trends in Ecology & Evolution31(5), 382–394. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.003

Excoffier, L. (2008). Analysis of population subdivision. In D. J. Balding, M. Bishop, & C. Cannings (Eds.), Handbook of statistical genetics (pp. 980–1020). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9780470061619.ch29

Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992). Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131(2), 479–491.  

Faith, D. P. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 61(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3

Glowka, L., Burhenne-Guilmin, F., Synge, H., McNeely, J. A., & Gündling, L. (1994). A guide to the convention on biological diversity(N.º 333.95 G946). Gland/Cambdrige/Bonn: IUCN and Environmental Law Centre IUCN.

González, M. T., & Poulin, R. (2005). Nested patterns in parasite component communities of a marine fish along its latitudinal range on the Pacific coast of South America. Parasitology131(4), 569–577. doi: 10.1017/S0031182005007900 

Pavoine, S., & Bonsall, M. B. (2011). Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: A unified approach. Biological Reviews86(4), 792–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00171.x

Petchey, O. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2002). Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecology Letters5(3), 402–411. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00339.x

Poulin, R., & Morand, S. (2000). The diversity of parasites. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 75(3), 277–293. doi: 10.1086/393500

Shi, M., Lin, X. D., Tian, J. H., Chen, L. J., Chen, X., Li, C. X., ... Zhang, Y.-Z. (2016). Redefining the invertebrate RNA virosphere. Nature, 540(7634), 539–543. doi: 10.1038/nature20167

Whittaker, R. H. (1960). Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs, 30(3), 279–338. doi: 10.2307/1943563

Downloads

Published

2019-03-06

How to Cite

Llopis-Belenguer, C., Blasco-Costa, I., & Balbuena, J. A. (2019). Beyond counting species: A new way to look at biodiversity. Metode Science Studies Journal, (9), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.9.11186
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    2020
  • Untitled (Español)
    2
  • PDF
    886

Issue

Section

In praise of life. The dynamic concept of biodiversity

Metrics

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.