Science and literature: Are the knowledge wars finally over?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.0.3563Keywords:
scientist stereotypes, lab-lit, alchemy, knowledge, power
Abstract
Since alchemy first challenged the authority of the Church, the relative status of specialized, scientific knowledge and high culture has been hotly contested. For centuries writers, as champions of culture, have retaliated against the claims of science by satirising its practitioners as being either evil, obsessive and possibly mad, or foolish and inept inventors whose experiments continually misfire. Examples of both these groups are discussed in their historical context. Around the end of the twentieth century a new genre designated «lab-lit» appeared. In this scientists are portrayed not as stereotypes but as ordinary people, pursuing science as they might any other profession within a life context and engaged with the ethical and sociological problems it involves. Reasons for the emergence of lab-lit are considered.
Downloads
Author Biography
Roslynn Haynes, University of Tasmania (Australia).
References
Blake, W., 1820. «Jerusalem». In Keynes, G. (ed.), 1966. The Complete Writings of William Blake. Oxford University Press. London.
Damon, S. F., 1979. A Blake Dictionary. Thames and Hudson. London.
Duncan, E. H., 1968. «The Literature of Alchemy and Chaucer’s “Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale”». Speculum, 43(S): 636-637. DOI: <10.2307/2855324>.
Haynes, R. D., 1994. From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore/London.
Haynes, R. D., 2006. «The Alchemist in Fiction: The Master Narrative». HYLE: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 12: 5-29.
Peters, H. P., 2014. «The Two Cultures: Scientists and Journalists, not an Outdated Relationship». Mètode Sciences Studies Journal, 4: 163-169. DOI: <10.7203/metode.80.3043>.
Rohn, J., 2009. «More Lab in the Library. Nature, 465(7298): 552. DOI: <10.1038/465552a>.
Shelley, M., 1996. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. J.P. Hunter (ed.). Norton. New York.
Snow, C. P., 1959. The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 10 April 2014 from:<http://s-f-walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/2cultures/Rede-lecture-2-cultures.pdf>.
Tudor, A.,1989. «Seeing the Worst Side of Science». Nature, 340(6235): 589-592. DOI: <10.1038/340589a0>.
Weart, S., 2001. Celluloid Scientists. BBC, 26 July. Radio 4.
Weingart, P.; Mühl, C. and P. Pansegrau, 2003. «Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film». Public Understanding of Science, 12(3): 279-287. DOI: <10.1177/0963662503123006>.
Wells, H.G., 1967. The Island of Doctor Moreau. Penguin. Harmondsworth.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract812
-
PDF (Català)209
-
(Español)1
-
PDF (Español)287
-
PDF151
Issue
Section
License
All the documents in the OJS platform are open access and property of their respective authors.
Authors publishing in the journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors keep the rights and guarantee Metode Science Studies Journal the right to be the first publication of the document, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and publication in the journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to spread their work through electronic means using personal or institutional websites (institutional open archives, personal websites or professional and academic networks profiles) once the text has been published.
Similar Articles
Make a Submission
Language
Information
Keywords
