Science and literature: Are the knowledge wars finally over?

Authors

  • Roslynn Haynes University of Tasmania (Australia).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.0.3563

Keywords:

scientist stereotypes, lab-lit, alchemy, knowledge, power

Abstract

Since alchemy first challenged the authority of the Church, the relative status of specialized, scientific knowledge and high culture has been hotly contested. For centuries writers, as champions of culture, have retaliated against the claims of science by satirising its practitioners as being either evil, obsessive and possibly mad, or foolish and inept inventors whose experiments continually misfire. Examples of both these groups are discussed in their historical context. Around the end of the twentieth century a new genre designated «lab-lit» appeared. In this scientists are portrayed not as stereotypes but as ordinary people, pursuing science as they might any other profession within a life context and engaged with the ethical and sociological problems it involves. Reasons for the emergence of lab-lit are considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Roslynn Haynes, University of Tasmania (Australia).

Member of the Australian Academy of the Humanities. Adjunct Associate Professor of School of Arts and Media. The University of New South Wales, UNSW (Australia). Honorary Associate of the School of English, Journalism and European Languages. University of Tasmania (Australia).

References

Blake, W., 1820. «Jerusalem». In Keynes, G. (ed.), 1966. The Complete Writings of William Blake. Oxford University Press. London.

Damon, S. F., 1979. A Blake Dictionary. Thames and Hudson. London.

Duncan, E. H., 1968. «The Literature of Alchemy and Chaucer’s “Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale”». Speculum, 43(S): 636-637. DOI: <10.2307/2855324>.

Haynes, R. D., 1994. From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore/London.

Haynes, R. D., 2006. «The Alchemist in Fiction: The Master Narrative». HYLE: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 12: 5-29.

Peters, H. P., 2014. «The Two Cultures: Scientists and Journalists, not an Outdated Relationship». Mètode Sciences Studies Journal, 4: 163-169. DOI: <10.7203/metode.80.3043>.

Rohn, J., 2009. «More Lab in the Library. Nature, 465(7298): 552. DOI: <10.1038/465552a>.

Shelley, M., 1996. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. J.P. Hunter (ed.). Norton. New York.

Snow, C. P., 1959. The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 10 April 2014 from:<http://s-f-walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/2cultures/Rede-lecture-2-cultures.pdf>.

Tudor, A.,1989. «Seeing the Worst Side of Science». Nature, 340(6235): 589-592. DOI: <10.1038/340589a0>.

Weart, S., 2001. Celluloid Scientists. BBC, 26 July. Radio 4.

Weingart, P.; Mühl, C. and P. Pansegrau, 2003. «Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film». Public Understanding of Science, 12(3): 279-287. DOI: <10.1177/0963662503123006>.

Wells, H.G., 1967. The Island of Doctor Moreau. Penguin. Harmondsworth.

Published

2015-04-16

How to Cite

Haynes, R. (2015). Science and literature: Are the knowledge wars finally over?. Metode Science Studies Journal, (5), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.0.3563
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    812
  • PDF (Català)
    209
  • (Español)
    1
  • PDF (Español)
    287
  • PDF
    151

Issue

Section

Crossroads. Where science and literature meet

Metrics

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.