Reconsiderando el “consecuencialismo kantiano”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/REK.7.2.25572Abstract
En este trabajo hemos tratado de evaluar el consecuencialismo kantiano que defiende David Cummiskey. La inspiración kantiana de esta particular lectura es innegable. Parte de una teoría del valor moral muy semejante a la del filósofo de Könisberg, trata muchas de las cuestiones textuales de las principales obras kantianas pero llega a conclusiones radicalmente distintas. En esto último radica el principal atractivo de una interpretación consecuencialista de Kant. Mientras que uno podría sugerir que la tradición leyó incorrectamente a Kant y que la perspectiva de Cummiskey es la mejor reconstrucción del pensamiento de este filósofo, hay elementos para poner esto en duda.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract463
-
PDF (Español)138
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
- The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work and to license it under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of its authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately establish additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).