Autorregulación del aprendizaje y procesos de evaluación formativa en los trabajos en grupo
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17402关键词:
Estudios universitarios, Criterio de evaluación, Trabajo en equipo, Autoevaluación
摘要
El objetivo de este estudio fue diseñar e implementar un contexto de evaluación formativa sobre un trabajo en grupo basado en la autorregulación del aprendizaje a través de las prácticas beneficiosas que expone la literatura y los retos que se plantean de cara a la próxima década. Se llevó a cabo una investigación cuantitativa a través de dos cuestionarios que midieron la capacidad de autorregulación y la forma de trabajar en grupo, con 88 estudiantes del Grado en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte. Los resultados muestran que la forma de trabajar en equipo reportada por los estudiantes no tuvo un impacto en la calificación obtenida en su trabajo. Por otro lado, una mayor capacidad de autorregulación en su estilo de aprendizaje y un mayor empleo de los criterios de evaluación resultaron significativos, alcanzando una calificación superior. No se encontraron diferencias en relación con la dimensión de evitación de la autorregulación. Se discuten las implicaciones teóricas y educativas.
##submission.authorBiographies##
##submission.authorWithAffiliation##
##submission.authorWithAffiliation##
##submission.authorWithAffiliation##
##submission.authorWithAffiliation##
参考
Alonso-Tapia, J., Panadero, E., & Ruiz, M. A. (2014). Development and validity of the Emotion and Motivation Self-regulation Questionnaire (EMSR-Q). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17(e55), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.41
Alonso Martín, P. (2007). Evaluación formativa y su repercusión en el clima del aula. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 25(2).
Alqassab, M., & Panadero, E. (2020). Peer assessment. In S. M. Brookhart (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Education. Routledge.
Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The Role of Classroom Assessment in Supporting Self-Regulated Learning. In D. Laveault, & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 293–310). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7275/g367-ye94
Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23(2), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0734
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 408–425). Routledge.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
Bowles, A., Fisher, R., McPhail, R., Rosenstreich, D., & Dobson, A. (2014). Staying the distance: Students’ perceptions of enablers of transition to higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.832157
Brooks, C. M., & Ammons, J. L. (2003). Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 78(5), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320309598613
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.n21
Brown, S. (2015). La evaluación auténtica: El uso de la evaluación para ayudar a los estudiantes a aprender. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 21(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.2.7674
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment. Learning from award winning practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740621
Carless, D., Kam, K., Chan, H., To, J., Lo, M., & Barrett, E. (2018). Developing students’ capacities for evaluative judgement through analysing exemplars. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, & J. Tai (Eds.), Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work (pp. 108–116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109251-12
Channon, S. B., Davis, R. C., Goode, N. T., & May, S. A. (2017). What makes a ‘good group’? Exploring the characteristics and performance of undergraduate student groups. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9680-y
Christie, H., Barron, P., & D’Annunzio-Green, N. (2013). Direct entrants in transition: becoming independent learners. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.588326
Coertjens, L., Brahm, T., Trautwein, C., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). Students’ transition into higher education from an international perspective. Higher Education, 79(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0092-y
Fraile, J., Panadero, E., & Pardo, R. (2017). Co-creating rubrics: The effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance of establishing assessment criteria with students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003
Fraile, J., Sánchez, J. M., & Gil, M. (2018, February 12-16). Empleo de los criterios de evaluación para la autorregulación del aprendizaje [Oral presentation]. 11o Congreso Internacional de Educación Superior, La Habana, Cuba.
Gale, T. & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating change: a typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 734–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.721351
García-Jiménez, E. (2015). La evaluación del aprendizaje: de la retroalimentación a la autorregulación. El papel de las tecnologías. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 21(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.2.7546
Gaudet, A. D., Ramer, L. M., Nakonechny, J., Cragg, J. J., & Ramer, M. S. (2010). Small-group learning in an upper-level university biology class enhances academic performance and student attitudes toward group work. PLoS ONE, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015821
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1994). Employer Satisfaction. Birmingham: University of Central England.
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, A., & López-Pastor, V. (2015). Student involvement and management of students’ workload in formative assessment in higher education. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.1.5171
Hultberg, J., Plos, K., Hendry, G. D., & Kjellgren, K. I. (2008). Scaffolding students’ transition to higher education: parallel introductory courses for students and teachers. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701781440
Ibarra-Sáiz, M., & Rodríguez-Gómez, G. (2020). Aprendiendo a evaluar para aprender en la Educación Superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 13(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2020.13.1.005
Ibarra Sáiz, M. S., & Rodríguez Gómez, G. (2010). An approach to the dominant discourse of learning assessment in higher education. Revista de Educación, 351, 385–407.
Ko, S. S. (2014). Peer assessment in group projects accounting for assessor reliability by an iterative method. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860110
Koivuniemi, M., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Higher education students’ learning challenges and regulatory skills in different learning situations / Desafíos de aprendizaje y habilidades de regulación en distintas situaciones de aprendizaje en estudiantes de educación superior. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 40(1), 19–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2016.1272874
Krause, K. L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892
Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2002). Reflections on «group project work and student-centred learning». Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26(2), 213–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260220144739
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of self-managed learning groups: Understanding students’ choices and concerns. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601004309
McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40–49. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ815370
McPhail, R., Fisher, R., & McConachie, J. (2009, June 29 – July 1). Becoming a Successful First year Undergraduate: when Expectations and Reality Collide. 12th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education, Townsville, Australia.
Meusen-Beekman, K. D., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Effects of formative assessments to develop self-regulation among sixth grade students: Results from a randomized controlled intervention. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 51, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.008
Nicol, D. (2014). Guiding principles for peer review: unlocking learners’ evaluative skills. In C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwistel, & J. McArthur (Eds.), Advances And Innovations In University Assessment And Feedback (pp. 197–224). Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694549.003.0011
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Oolbekkink‐Marchand, H. W., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2006). A breed apart? A comparison of secondary and university teachers’ perspectives on self‐regulated learning. Teachers and Teaching, 12(5), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600600832338
Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37(1), 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.881655
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: a roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
Panadero, E., & Broadbent, J. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: A self-regulated learning perspective. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, & J. Tai (Eds.), Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education: Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work (pp. 81–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109251
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
Panadero, E., Fraile, J., Fernández-Ruiz, J., Castilla-Estévez, D., & Ruiz, M. A. (2019). Spanish university assessment practices: Examination tradition with diversity by faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1512553
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Análisis de datos en ciencias sociales y de la salud (vol 2). Síntesis.
Pekrun, R. (2020). Self-report is indispensable to assess students’ learning. Frontline Learning Research, 8(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i3.637
Peñalver, J., Salanova, M., Martínez, I. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2019). Happy-productive groups: How positive affect links to performance through social resources. Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(3), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1402076
Pérez Pueyo, Á., Julián Clemente, J. A., & López Pastor, V. M. (2009). Evaluación formativa y compartida en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (EEES). In V. M. López (Ed.), Evaluación formativa y Compartida en Educación Superior (pp. 19–44). Narcea.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2015). Assessment as Learning and Empowerment: Towards Sustainable Learning in Higher Education. In M. Peris-Ortiz, & J. M. Merigó Lindahl (Eds.), Sustainable Learning in Higher Education. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management (pp. 1–20). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10804-9_1
Sockalingam, N. (2010). Characteristics of problems in problem-based learning . Social Sciences, Ph.D. Erasmus University Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1135
Sridharan, B., Tai, J., & Boud, D. (2019). Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement? Higher Education, 77(5), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0305-7
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
To, J., & Panadero, E. (2019). Peer assessment effects on the self-assessment process of first-year undergraduates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1548559
Zerihun, Z., Beishuizen, J., & Van Os, W. (2012). Student learning experience as indicator of teaching quality. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 24(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9140-4
Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). Routledge.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Influences on the Development of Academic Self-Regulatory Processes. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch3
##submission.downloads##
已出版
期
栏目
##submission.license##
Los autores ceden de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación de los trabajos publicados a RELIEVE (a los solos efectos de favorecer la difusión de los artículos publicados:firmar contratos de difusión, de integración en bases de datos, etc.) y consienten que se distribuyan bajo la licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-Uso No Comercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0), que permite a terceros el uso de lo publicado siempre que se mencione la autoría de la obra y la fuente de publicación, y se haga uso sin fines comerciales.
Los autores pueden llegar a otros acuerdos contractuales adicionales e independientes, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo, incluyéndolo en un repositorio institucional o publicándolo en un libro), siempre y cuando se cite claramente que la fuente original de publicación es esta revista.
A los autores se les anima a difundir su trabajo después de publicado, a través de internet (por ejemplo, en archivos institucionales en línea o en su página web) lo que puede generar intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas del trabajo.
La mera remisión del artículo a RELIEVE supone la aceptación de estas condiciones.
语言
消息