TaskTimeTracker: A tool for temporal analysis of the problem solving process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/ietem.1.16280Palabras clave:
Problem Solving Process, Time Activity Diagram, Software Tools
Resumen
The analysis of the problem solving process in mathematics can shed light on the learning process. However, the analysis of this process is a difficult task that has to face the complexity and non linearity of the process itself.
In this work we present the TTT software tool aimed to facilitate the registration and graphical representation of the steps that are followed by a group of students during the resolution of a problem, together with the time extension of these steps. This tool is based upon, and extends, the representation schemes presented by Arleback(2009), and can be applied to any problem resolution process (either mathematical or not) that can be divided into phases or categories along time.
Descargas
Citas
Albarracın, L., Arleback, J., Civil, E., & Gorgorio, N. (2019). Extending modelling activity diagrams as a tool to characterise
mathematical modelling processes. The Mathematics
Enthusiast, 16(1), 211–230.
Arleback, J. B. (2009). On the use of realistic fermi problems
in introducing mathematical modelling in upper
secondary mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast,
(3).
Berry, J., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Accountability affects the use
of small group learning in school mathematics. Nordic
Studies in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 5–31.
Borromeo Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. ZDM,
(2), 86–95.
Brandell, J. R. (2010). Theory & practice in clinical social
work. Sage.
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The ideal problem
solver. a guide for improving thinking, learning, and
creativity. Freeman.
Brown, J. P. (2003). An insight into student understanding of
functions in a graphing calculator environment [Master’s
thesis]. Department of Education, The University
of Melbourne.
Gillies, R. M. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work
in classrooms. International Journal of Educational
Research, 39(1), 35 - 49.
Goos, M., & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! metacognitive
strategies in collaborative mathematical problem
solving. Educational studies in mathematics, 30(3),
–260.
Pearl, J. (1984). Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for
computer problem solving. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.,
Inc., Reading, MA.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it; a new aspect of mathematical
method. US: Princeton University Press.
Puig Espinosa, L. (1996). Elementos de resoluci´on problemas.
Comares.
Reas, C., & Fry, B. (2007). Processing: A programming
handbook for visual designers and artists. MIT Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving.
Academic Press: Orlando, FL.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). On paradigms and methods: What
do you do when the ones you know don’t do what
you want them to? issues in the analysis of data in
the form of videotapes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 179-214. doi: Versi´on 0.1, August 27,
1207/s15327809jls0202_3
Scott, N., & Stacey, K. (2000). Orientation to deep structure
when trying examples: a key to successful problem
solving. Hergue.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development
of higher psychological processes. Harvard university
press.
Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993).
Mathematical problem solving. Research ideas for the
classroom: High school mathematics, 57, 78.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
-
Resumen538
-
PDF336
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los contenidos iETEM están protegidos por licencia Creative Commons del tipo Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 4.0.
Artículos similares
Enviar un artículo
Idioma
Información
Palabras clave
