Participation Patterns and Achievement in a MOOC on Digital Knowledge for Mexican In-Service Teacher Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.23.15904Keywords:
MOOCs, in-service training, massive online open courses
Abstract
Participation patterns and completion rates of a MOOC on Digital Knowledge for Teachers with over 8000 students were investigated in this article using descriptive statistics and cluster analysis according to age, gender and previous educational attainment. Results indicate that older and more educated participants obtained higher completion rates and employed more often the discussion forum. No gender differences were obtained. Participation in the course followed a funnel model in which there is a steep decrease of involvement after the first activity which stabilizes in the fifth one. The course rested on a basis of trust assuming that each participant voluntarily enrolled with the purpose of learning and therefore considering his/her self-perception of course performance as one element of overall appraisal is consistent with these courses.
Downloads
Author Biography
Ricardo Mercado del Collado, Universidad Veracruzana
References
Bates, T. (2014, 19 de 10). Strengths and weaknesses of MOOCs. Part I. [Blog post]. Descargado de https://www.tonybates.ca/2014/10/19/the-strengths-and-weaknesses-of-moocs-part-i/
Baturay, M. H. (2015). An Overview of the World of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685
Cassany, D., y Lenguaje y Textos. (2014). Cinco buenas prácticas de enseñanza con internet. , 39, 39–47. Descargado de http://hdl.handle.net/10230/27136
Clow, D. (2013). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. Third Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2013) (pp. 185–189). Descargado de https://oro.open.ac.uk/36657/1/DougClow-LAK13-revised-submitted.pdf
Coffrin, C., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., y Kennedy, G. (2014). Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCs. LAK ’14 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 83–92). https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567586
Cole, A. W., y Timmerman, C. E. (2015). What do current college students think about MOOCs? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 188–201. Descargado de https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Cole_0615.pdf
Dellarocas, C., y Alstybne, M. V. (2013). Money Models For MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56, 25–28. Descargado de https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2013/8/166304-money-models-for-moocs/fulltext
Dikke, D., y Faltin, N. (2015). Go_Lab MOOC- an online course for teacher professional development in the field of inquiry based science education. 7th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 1206503–1206503). Descargado de https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01206503/document
Dillahunt, T., Wang, B. Z., y Teasley, S. D. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1841
Domínguez, J., y Morcillo, S. (2016). Evaluación de un curso en línea para la formación de competencias en el uso de las TIC en profesores de ciencias de secundarias públicas del sureste de México. Revista de Educación a Distancia. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 51, 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/51/2
Downes, S. (2012, 23 de 04). The Rise of MOOCs. [Blog post]. Descargado de https://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=57911
Drake, J. R., Hara, M. O., y Seeman, E. (2015). Five Principles of MOOC Design: With a Case Study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 125–143. Descargado de http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol14/JITEv14IIPp125-143Drake0888.pdf
Florentine, S. (2015, 28 de 09). 4 ways MOOCs are changing teacher development. Descargado de https://www.cio.com/article/2986306/ 4-ways-moocs-are-changing-professional-development.html
García, P., Ibarra, C., y Sandoval, K. (2018). Cursos MOOC: Una alternativa de formación docente en CONALEP. En R. Mercado-del Collado (Ed.), Cursos masivos abiertos en línea (MOOCs). El caso de México (Vol. 6, pp. 169–182). Argentina: Brujas /Social TIC.
Glance, D. G., y Barrett, P. H. R. (2014). Attrition patterns amongst participant groups in Massive Open Online Courses. Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education 2014 (Vol. 31, pp. 12–20). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Descargado de https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/ attrition-patterns-amongst-participant-groups-in-massive-open-onl
Gulbahar, Y., Kalelioglu, F., y Bahadir-Kert, S. (2018). Teaching Computational Thinking to In-Service Computer Science Teachers through a Massive Open. Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 922–928). AACE. Descargado de https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/185051
Ho, A., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., y Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The First Year of Open Online Courses, Fall 2012-Summer 2013. Descargado de https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2381263
Huang, J., Dasgupta, A., Ghosh, A., Manning, J., y Sanders, M. (2014). Superposter behavior in MOOC forums. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning & Scale. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566249
IMCO. (2014). Mapa del magisterio de educación básica de México. Descargado de https:// imco.org.mx/capital_humano/mapa-del-magisterio-de-educacion-basica-en-mexico/
Johnson, R. A., y Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. London: Prentice Hall. Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
Kaul, M., Aksela, M., y Wu, X. (2018). Dynamics of the community of inquiry (Col) within a massive open online course (MOOC) for in-service teachers in environmental education. Dirasat. Educational Sciences, 8(2), 40–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020040
Kizilcec, R., y Halawa, S. (2015). Attrition and Achievement Gaps in Online Learning. Proceeding L@S ’15 Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724680
Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., y Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (Vol. 13, pp. 10–10).
Kumari, A. (2016). MOOCs - An online platform for teacher professional development. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(5), 102–107. Descargado de http://www.ajms.co.in/sites/ajms2015/index.php/ajms/article/view/1799/pdf_26
Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: professional development for teachers of disadvantage students. Research in Learning Technology, 24, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29369
León-Urrutia, M., Fielding, S., y White, S. (2016). Professional Development Through MOOCs in Higher Education Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities for PhD Students Working as Mentors. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1–10. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.427
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., y Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14, 202–227. Descargado de http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455/2531
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., y Milligan, C. (2013). Self-regulated learning in the workplace: Strategies and factors in the attainment of learning goals. International Journal of Training and Development, 17(4), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12013
Mercado-del Collado, R., Downes, S., Ramírez-Montoya, M., Farías-Gaytán, S., Morales-Rodríguez, A., Olguín-Aguilar, P., … García-Zúñiga, M. G. (2018). Cursos masivos abiertos en línea MOOCs: El caso de México (Vol. 6; R. M. del Collado, Ed.). Argentina: Brujas / Social TIC. Descargado de https://www.uv.mx/blogs/brechadigital/files/2018/12/hdt6.pdf
Misra, P. K. (2018). MOOCs for Teacher Professional Development: Reflections and Suggested Actions. Open Praxis, 10(1), 67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.780
Morris, N., Hotchkiss, S., y Swinnerton, B. (2015). Can demographic information predict MOOC learner outcomes? . Experience Track: Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder. Descargado de http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86184/
Onah, D., Sinclair, J., y Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout Rates of Massive Open Online Courses: Behavioural Patterns. 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN14) (pp. 5825–5834). Descargado de http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/65543/1/WRAP_9770711-cs-070115-edulearn2014.pdf
Oyo, B., Kalema, B., y Byabazaire, J. (2017). Los MOOC para profesores en ejercicio: El caso de Uganda y las lecciones para África. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 75(266), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-1-2017-07
Patru, M., y Balaji, V. (2016). Making Sense of MOOCs: A guide for policy-makers in developing countries (M. Patru y V. Balaji, Eds.). UNESCO / Commonwealth of Learning. Phan, T., McNeil, S., y Robin, B. (2016). Students´patterns of engagement and course performance in a Massive Online Course. Computers & Education, 95, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015
Ramírez-Martinell, A., y Casillas, M. (2018). MOOC: Saberes Digitales para Docentes. México: Lulu. Descargado de https://www.uv.mx/blogs/brechadigital/files/2018/12/MOOC-Saberes-Digitales.pdf
Ramírez-Martinell, A., y Casillas, M. A. (2015). Los saberes digitales de los universitarios. En J. Micheli et al. (Eds.), Educación virtual y universidad. Un modelo de evolución (Vol. 17, pp. 77–106). México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Ramírez-Martinell, A., y Casillas, M. A. (2017). Saberes digitales de los docentes de educación básica. Una propuesta para la discusión desde Veracruz. Descargado de https:// www.uv.mx/personal/albramirez/files/2015/06/Saberes-Digitales-SEV-libro-final.pdf
Ramírez-Martinell, A., Casillas, M. A., y Aguirre, I. G. (2018). Habilitación tecnológica de profesores universitarios y docentes de educación básica. Apertura, 10(2), 129–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.18381/Ap.v10n2.1368
Ramírez-Montoya, M., y Farías-Gaytán, S. (2018). De los ambientes a distancia a los cursos masivos abiertos:el caso de los MOOC del Tec de Monterrey. En R. Mercado-del Collado (Ed.), Los MOOC: El caso México. Argentina: Editorial Brujas. Descargado de https://repositorio.tec.mx/bitstream/handle/11285/628943/ 180428-Cap%20Mooc-Tec-UV.pdf?sequence=1
Rohs, M., y Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the Claim of Education for All: A Disilussion by Emprirical Data. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). Shah, D. (2018, 11 de 12). By The Numbers: MOOCs in 2018. [Blog post]. Descargado de https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2018/
Silva-Peña, I., y Salgado, I. (2014). Use of MOOCs in Teacher Education: advantages, disadvantages and riks. Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado, 18(1), 155–166. Descargado de https://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev181ART9.pdf
Universidad Veracruzana (2019). México X Saberes Digitales para Docentes Nivel 1. Descargado de https://www.mexicox.gob.mx/courses/course-v1:UV+SDPD19113X+2019_11/about
Zubieta, J., y Rama, C. (2015). La universidad a la vanguardia tecnológica: Los cursos masivos abiertos en línea (MOOC). La Educación a Distancia en México. Una nueva realidad universitaria. México: UNAM / Virtual Educa. Descargado de https://web.cuaed.unam.mx/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/PDF/educacionDistancia.pdf
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract1200
-
PDF (Español)626
-
EPUB (Español)79
-
HTML (Español)25301
-
XML (Español)83
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Universitat de València is the editor of Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) and retains the copyright of all that is published in the journal, while it allows and favours reuse under a copyleft license.
- The originals published in this journal are – unless otherwise specified – under a Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) encourages authors to disseminate and give visibility to their research published in this journal. For this, REALIA wishes to inform that:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
- The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
- Self-archive: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) to promote greater visibility and citation, with an acknowledgement of its first publication in this journal.
Similar Articles
Make a Submission
Language
Information
Keywords
