Curriculum transformation in a diverse society: Who decides curriculum, and how?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.2.13374

Keywords:

curriculum, ethnic studies, counter-narratives, curricular transformation

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show how, in the United States, some states and school districts are transforming their curriculum through ethnic studies. Ethnic studies exists as a result of unequal power relations in which historically marginalized groups have not had the power to define how education will serve their own communities. According to its activists, ethnic studies not only teaches about the cultures of diverse groups, but also reconstructs, the curriculum around the counter-narratives perspectives, epistemologies, and visions of groups that have been treated historically as if their experiences and perspectives were of lesser value. The article begins with a theoretical framework that considers school knowledge as filtered through the perspectives of dominant groups. Sleeter then reviews research on the perspectives that structure the knowledge in school textbooks, showing how it represents narratives of dominant groups, and the impact of those perspectives on minoritized students. Then Sleeter considers ethnic studies as counter-narrative, and reviews research on the academic impact of ethnic studies on students. A limitation of the implementation of ethnic studies is that it addresses specific courses rather than transforming the whole curriculum. Sleeter developed a framework to help teachers transform their lessons and units in all disciplines, using the central ideas of ethnic studies; this framework is presented. The article concludes with a few implications for Spain from this work in the United States

Author Biography

Christine Sleeter, California State University Monterey Bay

She is Professor Emerita in the College of Professional Studies at California State University Monterey Bay. She is past President of the National Association for Multicultural Education, past Vice President of Division K of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Her research focuses on anti-racist multicultural education, ethnic studies, and teacher education. Postal address: 118 ½ Dunecrest Ave., Monterey CA 93940, USA.

References

Aguado, T., Ballestreros, B., & Malik, B. (2003). Cultural diversity and school equity. A model to evaluate and develop educational practices in multicultural education contexts. Excellence & Equity in Education 36(1), 50-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680303500

Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge Falmer.  doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487563

Banks, J. A. (1993). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational Researcher 22 (5), 4–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022005004

Banks, J. A. (2004). Race, knowledge construction, and education in the United States. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 228–239). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Besalú Costa, X. (2016). Interculturalidad y convivencia: discursos que anticipan y legitiman prácticas. Una Mirada Intercultural y Para la Equidad y la Justicia Social 14, 27-33.

Brown, A. L. & Brown, K. D. (2010). Silenced memories: An examination of the sociocultural knowledge on race and racial violence in official school curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education 43(2), 139-154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10665681003719590

Brown, A. L. & Brown, K. D. (2015). The more things change, the more they stay the same: Excavating race and the enduring racisms in U.S. curriculum. Teachers College Record 17(14), 103-130.

Cabrera, N. L., Milam, J. F., Jaquette, O., & Marx, R. W. (2014). Missing the (student achievement) forest for all the (political) trees. American Educational Research Journal 51(6): 1084-1118. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214553705

Cammarota, J., & Romero, A. (2009). The Social Justice Education Project: A critically compassionate intellectualism for Chicana/o students. In W. Ayers, T. Quinn & D. Stovall (Eds.), Handbook for social justice education (p. 465-476). New York: Routledge.

Carretero, M. (2011). Constructing patriotism. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.

Dee, T., & Penner, E. (2017). The causal effects of cultural relevance: Evidence from an ethnic studies curriculum. American Educational Research Journal 54 (1): 127-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216677002

Epstein, T. (2009). Interpreting national history. New York: Routledge.

Gallegos, B. P. (1998). Remembering the Alamo: Imperialism, memory, and postcolonial educational studies. Educational Studies, 29(3), 232–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326993es2903_1

Grant, C. A. & Sleeter, C. E. (2009). Turning on learning, 5th ed. New York: Wiley.

Martinez, G. (2010). Native pride. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.

Noboa, J. (2005). Leaving Latinos out of history: Teaching US history in Texas. New York: Routledge.

Ochoa, G. L. (2007). Learning from Latino teachers. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Pelligrino, A., Mann, L. & Russell, W. B., III. (2013). Lift as we climb: A textbook analysis of the segregated school experience. The High School Journal 96: 209-231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2013.0009

Rojas, M. A. (2010). (Re)visioning U.S. Latino literatures in high school English classrooms. English Education 42(3): 263-277.

Romanowski, M. H. (2009). Excluding ethical issues from U.S. history textbooks. American Secondary Education 37 (2), 26-48.

Samper Rosero L. &  Garreta Bochaca, J. (2011). Muslims in Catalonian textbooks. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society 3(1), 81-96.

Sleeter, C. E. (2011). The academic and social value of ethnic studies. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

Sleeter, C. E. & Flores Camona, J. (2016). Un-standardizing curriculum: Multicultural teaching in the standards-based classroom, 2nd  ed. New York: Teachers College Press. 

Stanton, C. R. (2014). The curricular Indian agent: Discursive colonization and Indigenous (dys)angency in U. S. history textbooks. Curriculum Inquiry 44(5): 649-676. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12064

Van Alphen, F. & Carretero, M. (2015). The construction of the relation between national past and present in the appropriation of historical master narratives. Integrative Psychology and Behavioral Sciences 49, 512-530. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9302-x

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design, 2nd ed. New York: Pearson.

Zavala, M., Cuauhtin, T., Sleeter C., & Au, W. (Coord.) (In press). Rethinking ethnic studies. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools Ltd.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 2 (2018)

Section

Special Section

License

The authors grant non-exclusive rights of exploitation of works published to RELIEVE and consent to be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Use 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published material whenever the authorship of the work and the source of publication is mentioned, and it is used for non-commercial purposes. 

    The authors can reach other additional and independent contractual agreements, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, by including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), as long as it is clearly stated that the Original source of publication is this magazine.  

    Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work after it has been published, through the internet (for example, in institutional archives online or on its website) which can generate interesting exchanges and increase work appointments. 

   The fact of sending your paper to RELIEVE implies that you accept these conditions.