Student Engagement and Academic Performance in the Colombian University Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.20.2.4238Keywords:
Student dropout, retention, higher education, student engagement, academic performance, NSSE, academic challenge, active and collaborative learning, student-faculty interaction, enriching educational experiences, and supportive campus environmentAbstract
Despite the increase in Latin America of Higher Education coverage, grave dropout problems persist that question the role of educational experiences to foster students’ academic engagement. This study was carried out in Colombia and sought to establish the relationship between the five benchmarks that compose academic engagement and the academic performance of a group of Colombian university students. The transversal and correlational study used the Spanish version of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) that measures students’ level of participation in five dimensions: Academic challenge, active and collaborative learning, student-faculty interaction, enriching educational experiences, and supportive campus environment and its relationship to academic performance. The findings of 1906 students from 7 universities indicate that there are statistically significant, but weak correlations between the items that compose the benchmarks and students’ academic performance, which lead to reflect upon key aspects to strengthen the education experiences offered to university students.References
stin, A. (1993). What matters in college?. Liberal Education, 79(4), 4-12.
Bailey, T. R. & Alfonso, M. (2005). Paths to persistence: An analysis of research on program effectiveness at community colleges. Lumina Foundation for Education. New Agenda Series, 6(1), 1-44.
Baldaguez, J. (2010). Encuesta Nacional sobre el Compromiso Estudiantil 2008. Universidad de Puerto Rico en Humacao, Humacao, Puerto Rico.
Bellei, C. (2013). Situación educativa de América Latina y el Caribe: Hacia la educación de calidad para todos al 2015. Santiago: UNESCO-PRELAC.
Bonner, J. (2010). Taking a stand as a student-centered research university: Active and collaborative learning meets scholarship of teaching at the University of Alabama. JGE: The Journal of General Education, 59(4), 183-192.
Braxton, J., Milem, J. & Sullivan, A. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569–590.
Byerly, A., Chang, M., Chopp, R., Fix, S., Jaquette, J., Kuh, G.,… Wheatley, S. (2007). Student learning and faculty research: Connecting teaching and scholarship. A Teagle Foundation white Paper. American Council of Learned Societies. Recuperado de http://www.acls.org/uploadedfiles/publications/programs/acls-teagle_teacher_scholar_white_paper.pdf
Carini, R., Kuh, G. & Klein, S. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
Castaño, E., Gallón, S., Gómez, K. & Vásquez, J. (2006). Análisis de los factores asociados a la deserción y graduación estudiantil universitaria. Lecturas de Economía, 65, 9- 36.
Castillo, J. & Cabezas, G. (2010). Caracterización de jóvenes de primera generación en educación superior. Nuevas trayectorias hacia la equidad educativa. Calidad en la Educación, 32, 43-76.
Chickering, A. & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
Cox, B., McIntosh, K., Terenzini, P., Reason, R. & Lutovsky, B. (2010). Pedagogical signals of faculty approachability: Factors shaping faculty-student interaction outside the classroom. Research in Higher Education, 51(8), 767-788. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9178-z
Drake, R. G. (2011). Why should faculty be involved in supplemental instruction? College Teaching, 59(4), 135-141. doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.586656.
Fajardo, A., Ibáñez, E. & Saad, C. (2007). Permanencia y deserción de los estudiantes de la facultad de enfermería de la Universidad El Bosque desde el segundo período académico de 2001 hasta el primer período académico de 2006. Bogotá, D.C. Revista Colombiana en Enfermería, 2(2), 67- 76.
Fall, L. (2006). Value of engagement: Factors influencing how students perceive their community contribution to public relations internships. Public Relations Review, 32, 407-415.
Garbanzo, G. (2007). Factores asociados al rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios, una reflexión desde la calidad de la educación superior pública. Educación Universidad de Costa Rica, 31(1), 43- 63.
García, A. & Muñoz, M. (2011). Magnitud de la deserción estudiantil en el programa de derecho y ciencias políticas 2000-2010. Universidad Libre de Cali. Recuperado de http://www.unilibrecali.edu.co/home/images/stories/Nuestrauniversidad/Autoevaluacion/magnitud_desercion_estudiantil_derecho.pdf
García, J. (2013). Movilidad estudiantil internacional y cooperación educativa en el nivel superior de educación. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 61, 59-76.
Gargallo, B., Almerich, G., Suárez-Rodríguez, J. M. & García-Félix, E. (2012). Estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios excelentes y medios. Su evolución a lo largo del primer año de carrera. RELIEVE, 18(2), art.1. doi: 10.7203/relieve.18.2.2000
Guzmán, C., Durán, D., Franco, J., Castaño, E., Gallón, S., Gómez, K. & Vásquez, J. (2009). Deserción estudiantil en la educación superior colombiana. Metodología de seguimiento, diagnóstico y elementos para su prevención. Bogotá: Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia.
Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2011). Informe institucional de resultados de la Encuesta de Participación Estudiantil en México. Recuperado de: http://sitios.itesm.mx/va/NSSE/pdfs/Rejees11.pdf
Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2012). 4to informe institucional de resultados de la Encuesta de Participación Estudiantil en México. Recuperado de http://sitios.itesm.mx/va/NSSE/pdfs/Repe12.pdf
Kim, Y. & Sax, L. (2009). Student-faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437-459.
Kim, Y. & Sax, L. (2011). Are the effects of student-faculty interaction dependent on academic major? An examination using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 52(6), 589-615. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9209-9.
Kokkelenberg, E., Dillon, M. & Christy, S. (2008). The effects of class size on student grades at a public university. Economics of Education Review, 27, 221-233.
Kuh, G. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5-17.
Kuh, G. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 3(33), 10-17.
Kuh, G. & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309-332.
Kuh, G., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J. & Gonyea, R. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540-563.
Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., Whitt, E. & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lambert, A., Rocconi, L., Ribera, A., Miller, A. & Dong, Y. (2012, June). Faculty lend a helping hand to student success: Measuring student-faculty interactions. Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research 2012 Annual Conference. Recuperado de http://cpr.iub.edu/uploads/Faculty%20Lend%20a%20Helping%20Hand%20to%20Student%20Success%20Measuring%20Student-Faculty%20Interactions.pdf.
Lau, L. (2003). Institutional factors affecting student retention. Education, 124(1), 126–136.
McCormick, A. (2011). It’s about time: What to make of reported declines in how much college students study. Liberal Education, 97(1), 30-39.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2013). NSSE 2013. Engagement indicators. Internal consistency statistics by class level. Recuperado de http://nsse.iub.edu/2013_institutional_report/pdf/EI%20Intercorrelations%202013.pdf.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2014). NSSE's Commitment to data. Recuperado de http://nsse.iub.edu/html/psychometric_portfolio.cfm.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2012a). Psychometric portfolio. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. Recuperado de http://nsse.iub.edu/links/data_quality, 2012 .
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2012b). Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. Recuperado de http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2012_Results/pdf/NSSE_2012_Annual_Results.pdf.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2005). Exploring different dimensions of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
Osorio, A., Bolancé, C. & Castillo, M. (2012). Deserción y graduación estudiantil universitaria: una aplicación de los modelos de supervivencia. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 3(6), 31-57.
Pascarella, E. & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pérez, A., Ramón, J. & Sánchez, J. (2000). Análisis exploratorio de las variables que condicionan el rendimiento académico. Universidad Pablo de Olavide. Sevilla, España.
Pike, G. (2006). The convergent and discriminant validity of NSSE scalelet scores. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 551-564.
Pineda, C. & Pedraza, A. (2011). Persistencia y graduación. Hacia un modelo de retención estudiantil para instituciones de educación superior. Bogotá: ARFO Editores e Impresores Ltda.
Pineda, C. (2010). La voz del estudiante. El éxito de programas de retención universitaria. Chía: Universidad de La Sabana.
Pinto, M., Durán, D., Pérez, R., Reverón, C. & Rodríguez, A. (2007). Cuestión de supervivencia. Graduación, deserción y rezago en la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá: Unibiblos.
Pozo, M. & García, B. (2006). El portafolio del alumnado: una investigación-acción en el aula universitaria. Revista de Educación, 341, 737-756.
Rojas, M. (2008). La deserción estudiantil en la Universidad de Ibagué: La perspectiva de los «desertores». Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, 25. Recuperado de http://revistavirtual.ucn.edu.co/index.php/RevistaUCN/article/view/123.
Salazar, M., Lucio, D., López, W. & Aguado, E. (2013). Informe sobre la producción científica en Colombia en revistas iberoamericanas de acceso abierto en redalyc.org, 2005-2011. Bogotá: Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología.
Sánchez, G., Navarro, E. & García, A. (2009). Factores de deserción estudiantil en la Universidad Surcolombiana. Paideia Surcolombiana, 14, 97-103.
Seifert, T., Pascarella, T., Goodman, K., Salisbury, M. & Blaich, C. (2010). Liberal Arts Colleges and good practices in undergraduate education: Additional evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 51, 1-22.
Sistema Nacional de Información de la Educación Superior. (2013). Estadísticas de educación superior. Subdirección de Desarrollo Sectorial. Ministerio de Educación Nacional de Colombia. Recuperado de: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/sistemasdeinformacion/1735/articles-212350_resumen.xls
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (2011). La deserción estudiantil de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Medellín en el sistema de educación superior colombiano. Oficina de Planeación. Recuperado de http://www.medellin.unal.edu.co/dirplanea/documentos/DesercionComparadaUN 2011.pdf
Vélez, A. & Roa, C. (2005). Factores asociados al rendimiento académico en estudiantes de medicina. Educación Médica, 8(2), 74-82.
Vieira, M., Vidal, J. & Barrio, S. (2007). Una herramienta de evaluación para comparar la experiencia académica de los estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 25(2), 327-350.
Zyngier, D. (2008). (Re)conceptualizing student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1765-1776.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors grant non-exclusive rights of exploitation of works published to RELIEVE and consent to be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Use 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published material whenever the authorship of the work and the source of publication is mentioned, and it is used for non-commercial purposes.
The authors can reach other additional and independent contractual agreements, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, by including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), as long as it is clearly stated that the Original source of publication is this magazine.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work after it has been published, through the internet (for example, in institutional archives online or on its website) which can generate interesting exchanges and increase work appointments.
The fact of sending your paper to RELIEVE implies that you accept these conditions.