Teaching evaluation vs. Quality evaluation

Authors

  • Rubén Cervini Universidad Nacional de Quilmes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.8.2.4365

Keywords:

Evaluation Research, Questionnaires, Evaluation Methods, Teaching Evaluation

Abstract

A review is made on the instruments and dimensions that use the different Spanish universities to evaluate the professors from student’s ratings. Selecting repeated items, almost used in four or more universities, a new instrument has been created and validated with 334 students of the University of A Coruña. Results are analysed.

References

Aitking, M. y Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 149, pp.1-42.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2981882

Alexander, L. and Simmons, J. (1975). The determinants of school achievement in developing countries: the educational production function. World Bank Staff Working Paper, Nº 201. Washington: World Bank.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Las formas del capital. Trad. de Andrés García Inda en: Poder, Derecho y Clases Sociales, Cap. IV. Bilbao:Desclée de Brouwer.

Bowles, S. y Levin, H. (1968). The determinants of scholastic achievement. An appraisal of some recent evidence. Journal of Human Resources, invierno, vol. 3 (1), pp. 3-24.

Bryk, A. y Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models for Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

Cervini, R (1999). Calidad y Equidad en la Educación Básica de Argentina. Factores Asociados al Logro Escolar, Nº 5. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Cultura y Educación de la Nación.

Cervini, R (2002a) La distribución social de los rendimientos escolares. En: El rendimiento escolar en Argentina - Análisis de resultados y factores. Emilio Tenti (Org.), Buenos Aires: Editorial Losada.

Cervini, R (2002b). Desigualdades en el Logro Académico y Reproducción Cultural en Argentina - Un modelo de tres niveles. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, Vol.VIII (16). México: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa (en prensa).

Coleman, J. (1969) The concept of Equality of Educational Opportunity. Harvard Educational Review. Special Issue 'Equal Educational Opportunity'.

Coleman, J. (1975) What is meant by 'an equal educational opportunity'. Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 1 (1), pp.27-29.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305498750010104

Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F. y York, R. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education. Washington: Government Printing Office.

Cuttance, P. (1987). Modelling variation in the effectiveness of schooling. Edinburgh: Centre for Educational Sociology.

Fraser,B., Walberg, H, Welch, W. y Hattie,J. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11 (2), pp.245-252.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90035-8

Goldstein, H. (1987) Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. Griffin. London

Guttman, A. (2001). La educación democrática - Una teoría política de la educación. Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.

Heyneman, S. (1976). Influences on Academic Achievement: A Comparison of Results from Uganda and More Industrialized Societies. Sociology of Education, 49, pp. 200-11.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112231

Heyneman, S. (1980). Difference between Developed and Developing Countries: Comments on Simmons and Alexander's "Determinants of School Achievement". Economic Development and Cultural Change, 28 (2), pp. 403-6.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/451180

Heyneman, S. y Loxley W. (1982). Influence on Academic Achievement across High and Low Income Countries: A Reanalysis of IEA Data. Sociology of Education, 55 (1), pp. 13-21.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112607

Jencks,C. et al. (1972). Inequality: a reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic.

Lareau,A. (1987). Social class diferences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, vol.60 (2), pp. 73-85.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112583

Lockheed, M., Fuller, B. y Nyirondo, R. (1989). Family effects on students' achievement in Thailand and Malawi. Sociology of Education, vol. 62 (October), pp. 239-256.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112829

Munoz Izquierdo, C. y Ulloa, M. (1992). Cuatro tesis sobre el origen de las desigualdades educativas - Una reflexión apoyada en el caso de México. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, vol. XXII (2), pp. 11-58.

Ocampo, J. (2000). Equidad, Desarrollo y Ciudadanía. CEPAL Documento Central 2000-2001. Santiago: CEPAL.

Rawls, J. (1979) Teoría de la Justicia. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica

Rawls, J. (1982). Social Unity and Primary Goods. En: A. Sen y B. Williams (Ed.) Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.159-186.

Ridell, A. (1989). An alternative approach to the study of school effectiveness in Third World Countries. Comparative Education Review, Vol.33 (4), pp. 481-97.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/446881

Ridell, A. (1997). Assessing designs school effectiveness research and school improvement in developing countries. Comparative Education Review, vol.41 (2), pp. 178-204.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/447429

SIEMPRO (2001). No se trata de un ranking de calidad, se trata de un ranking de desigualdad y pobreza. Sistema de Información, Monitoreo y Evaluación de Programas Sociales - SIEMPRO. Buenos Aires: SIEMPRO.

Schiefelbein, E. y Simmons, J. (1980) Los determinantes del rendimiento escolar. Reseña de la investigación para los países en desarrollo. Educación hoy, nº 60.

Van Parijs, P. (1992). ¿Qué es una sociedad justa? Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión.

Walberg, H.J. (1986). Synthesis of research on teaching. En: M.C. Wittrock (Ed.). Handbook of research on teaching (pp.85-102). Washington: American Educational Research Association.

Wolff, L., Schiefelbein, E. y Valenzuela, J. (1993). Mejoramiento de la calidad de la educación primaria en América Latina y el Caribe: hacia el siglo XXI. Banco Mundial, América Latina y el Caribe, Programa de Estudios Regionales, Informe Nº 28.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2002)

Section

Research Articles

License

The authors grant non-exclusive rights of exploitation of works published to RELIEVE and consent to be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Use 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published material whenever the authorship of the work and the source of publication is mentioned, and it is used for non-commercial purposes. 

    The authors can reach other additional and independent contractual agreements, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, by including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), as long as it is clearly stated that the Original source of publication is this magazine.  

    Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work after it has been published, through the internet (for example, in institutional archives online or on its website) which can generate interesting exchanges and increase work appointments. 

   The fact of sending your paper to RELIEVE implies that you accept these conditions.