Deconstructing the notion of a “good teacher”. An analysis of the formal and non-formal characteristics of university teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.2.9419Keywords:
Appraisals of teaching, teaching quality, student satisfaction
Abstract
Background: Student appraisals of teaching quality in universities have mainly focused on more formal aspects of teaching, overlooking other personal factors.
Objective: To identify and analyse the weight of each of the different factors that contribute to the notion of what good teaching represents for students. That is, to identify the equation that constitutes a “good instructor”.
Method: A crosscutting survey, based on the results of reviews and research by the author, leading to the identification of the different factors involved in student appraisals of university teaching. The sample was 885 students from the University of the Balearic Islands, obtained through multistage mixed sampling.
Results: A solution of four factors. In order of explained variance, from highest to lowest, they are personal qualities, teaching competence, compliance and subject matter. From the regression analysis that was conducted, each of the four factors was found to have a statistically significant effect on appraisals of good teaching, with the first and second factors jointly accounting for 93% of all the model’s explained variance.
Conclusions: The big impact of characteristics unrelated to teaching in the resulting equation opens up debate on the relevance of an instructor’s personal qualities, not only in contributing to student satisfaction but also in influencing the teaching and learning process.
Author Biography
Antonio Casero-Martínez, Antonio, Universitat de les Illes Balears
References
Abrami, P.C. & D’Apollonia, S. (1990). The dimensionality of ratings and their use in personnel decisions. In M. Theall y J. Franklin (Comps.), Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice. New directions for teaching and learning, (pp. 97-111). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación. Consultado 24-7-2015. http://www.aneca.es
Álvarez, V., García Jiménez, E. & Gil, J. (1999b). Características de la docencia mejor evaluada por los alumnos en las diferentes áreas de enseñanza universitaria. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 214, 445-464
Aparicio, J.J., Tejedor, F.J. & Sanmartín, R. (1982). La enseñanza universitaria vista por sus alumnos: Un estudio para la evaluación de los cursos de la enseñanza superior. Madrid: ICE/ Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Apodaca, P. & Grad, H. (2002). Análisis dimensional de las opiniones de los alumnos universitarios sobre sus profesores: Comparación entre técnicas paramétricas y no-paramétricas. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 20(2), 385-409.
Brown, G. (1993). Staff Development in Britain. Restrospective and prospective. Looking back and looking forward. En L.M. Lázaro Lorente (Ed.), Formación Pedagógica del Profesorado Universitario y Calidad de la Educación. Valencia: Servei de Formació Permanent, Universidad de Valencia/ CIDE.
Capelleras, J.L. & Veciana, J.M. (2001, septiembre). Calidad de servicio en la enseñanza universitaria: Desarrollo y validación de una escala de medida. Actas del XI Congreso Nacional de ACEDE, La nueva economía: retos y oportunidades para la gestión empresarial. Zaragoza.
Casero, A. (2008). Propuesta de un cuestionario de evaluación de la calidad docente universitaria consensuado entre alumnos y profesores. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 26, 25-44.
Casero, A. (2010a). ¿Cómo es el buen profesor universitario según el alumnado? Revista Española de Pedagogía, 246, 223-242.
Casero, A. (2010b). Modulating factors in the perception of teaching quality. RELIEVE, 16(2). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7203/relieve.16.2.4135
Cashin, W.E. & Downey, R.G. (1992). Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 563-572.
De la Cruz, M.A. (1999). Modelo de profesor y modelo de formación. En T. Hornilla (Coor.), Formación del profesorado universitario y calidad de la enseñanza. Leioa: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad del País Vasco.
De Miguel, M. (Dir.). (1991). Criterios para la evaluación del profesorado. Oviedo: Departamento de Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Oviedo.
Drews, D.R., Burroughs, W.J. y Nokovich, D.A. (1987). Teacher self-ratings as validity criterion for student evaluations. Teaching of Psychology, 14(1), 23-25.
Dunkin, M.J. y Precians, R.P. (1992). Award-winning university teachers’ concepts of teaching. Higher Education, 24, 483-502.
Elton, L. (1987). Teaching in higher education: appraisal and training. London: Kogan Page.
Ericksen, S.C. (1985). The essence of godd teaching. Helping students to learn and remember what they learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Escudero, T. (2000). La voz de los estudiantes: un delicado instrumento de evaluación. Cuadernos IRC, 5, 31-38
Feldman, K.A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the students’s view. Research in Higher Education, 5, 243-288.
García Garduño, J.M. (2000). Las dimensiones de la efectividad docente, validez y confiabilidad de los cuestionarios de evaluación de la docencia: síntesis de investigación internacional. In M. Rueda y F. Díaz (Comps.), Evaluación de la docencia: perspectivas actuales (pp.41-62). México DF: Paidós.
García Ramos. J.M. (1999). Análisis multirrasgo-multimétodo en la validación de instrumentos para la evaluación de la calidad docente en instituciones universitarias. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 214, 417-444.
González Such, J., Jornet, J.M., Suárez, J.M. & Pérez Carbonell, A. (1999). Análisis de tipologías de calidad docente a partir de un cuestionario de evaluación del profesorado universitario. Bordón, 51(1), 95-113.
Gros, B. & Romañá, T. (2004). Ser Profesor. Palabras sobre la docencia universitaria. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Hines, C.V., Cruickshank, D. & Kennedy, J.J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relationship to student achievement and satisfaction. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 87-99.
Mairata, M.J. & Servera, M. (1996). L’avaluació de la qualitat docent a la Universitat de les Illes Balears. L’Arc, 2, 45-48.
Marsh, H.W. (1987). Students’ Evaluation of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 255-388.
Marsh, H.W. (2007). Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness. En R.P. Perry & J.C. Smart (eds.), The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective, (pp. 319-383). Netherlands: Springer.
Marsh, H.W. & Hocevar, D. (1984). The factorial invariance of student evaluations of college teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 341-366.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K., Chung, C. y Siu, T. (1997). Students’ evaluation of university teaching: Chinese version of the students’ evaluations of educational quality instrument. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 568-572.
Mateo, M.A. & Fernández, J. (1993). Dimensiones de la calidad de la enseñanza universitaria. Psicothema, 5(2), 265-275.
Muñiz, J., García, A. & Virgos, J.M. (1991). Escala de la Universidad de Oviedo para la evaluación del profesorado. Psicothema, 3(2), 269-281.
Muñoz, J.M., Ríos, M.P. & Abalde, E. (2002). Evaluación docente vs. Evaluación de la calidad. RELIEVE, 8(2), 103-134. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7203/relieve.8.2.4362
Pascual, I. & Gaviria, J. L. (2004). El problema de la fiabilidad en la evaluación de la eficacia docente en la universidad: una alternativa metodológica. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 62, 229, 359-375.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Rubie-Davies, C.M. (2010). Teacher expectations and perceptions of student attributes: Is there a relationship? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 121-135.
Seldin, P. (1993). The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. The Chronicle of Her Education, p. 440.
Spilt, J.L., Koomen, H.M.Y. & Thijs, J.T. (2011). Teacher Wellbeing: The Importance of Teacher–Student Relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 457-477.
Tejedor, F. J. (2012). Evaluación del desempeño docente. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 5(1), 318-327. http://www.rinace.net/riee/numeros/vol5-num1_e/art24.pdf
Tejedor, F. J. & Jornet, J. M. (2008). La evaluación del profesorado universitario en España. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 10(SPE.), 1-29. http://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/199/339
Theall, M. & Feldman, K.A. (2007). Commentary and update on Feldman’s (1997) “Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings”. In R.P. Perry & J.C. Smart (eds.), The Scholasship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective, (pp.130-143). Netherlands: Springer.
Unidad Técnica de Evaluación y Mejora de la Calidad Docente (2003). Informe general sobre la calidad docente del profesorado de la ULL. La Laguna: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors grant non-exclusive rights of exploitation of works published to RELIEVE and consent to be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Use 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published material whenever the authorship of the work and the source of publication is mentioned, and it is used for non-commercial purposes.
The authors can reach other additional and independent contractual agreements, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, by including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), as long as it is clearly stated that the Original source of publication is this magazine.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work after it has been published, through the internet (for example, in institutional archives online or on its website) which can generate interesting exchanges and increase work appointments.
The fact of sending your paper to RELIEVE implies that you accept these conditions.
Language
Information