Student involvement in assessment: involving the whole student in pursuit of social justice and the social good

作者

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17089

关键词:

Student involvement, Critical Theory, Social good, Social justice, Authentic assessment, Student achievement, Honneth, Mutual recognition, Responsive assessment

摘要

In this article I offer a perspective on student involvement in assessment informed by critical theory and underpinned by a commitment to greater social justice within and through higher education.  It builds on earlier work on assessment for social justice to argue that student involvement in assessment must be considered more broadly than simply students doing particular tasks.  Instead, we must think of the student as a whole person, socially situated, and the ways in which engagement with assessment tasks nurtures both individual and social wellbeing.  There are three streams to the argument proposed.  Firstly, that scholarship on assessment should do more to problematise the nature of knowledge and that understanding the complexities of knowledge in higher education has links to both the experiences of our student as a whole person and social justice.  Secondly, that the purposes of assessment should be orientated to the critical theory notion of a social good, in which individual and social wellbeing are dialectically inter-related.  Finally, in thinking of the student’s involvement in assessment we must go beyond the conflation of the real world with the world of work which features in much of the literature on authentic assessment.  Instead, I propose the importance of understanding the economic realm as a broad and heterogenous sphere and one that cannot be disarticulated from the social realm.

##submission.authorBiography##

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

Jan McArthur is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Educational Research in Lancaster University and a research member of the Centre for Global Higher Education. Her main interests in research focus on two themes: education and social justice, and the nature of higher education. Similarly, McArthur has a considerable interest in inter-relationships between education and society, and between theory and practice. She has explored different interpretations of critical pedagogy, and the ways in which the conceptualizations of knowledge impacts on social justice. A great deal of her work relies on the critical theory, and shows a special interest in the work by Theodor Adorno. Her recent work has analyzed the nature of evaluation and feedback and their role of failure in learning including the relationship between conceptions of failure and social justice. In her last book,  Assessment for social justice , McArthur explores the potential for promoting social justice within and through assessment in higher education and draws on the critical theory of Axel Honneth.

参考

Adorno, T. W. (2001). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1959). Polity.

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566  

Ashwin, P. (2014). Knowledge, curriculum and student understanding in higher education. Higher Education, 67, 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9715-3

Ashwin, P., Abbas, A., & McLean, M. (2012). The pedagogic device: Sociology, knowledge practice and teaching-learning processes. In P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and Territories in the 21st century: rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education (pp. 118-129). Routledge.

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Rowman and Littlefield.

Biglan, A. (1973). The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701

Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240405  

Bovill, C. (2013). Staff–student partnerships in higher education. Educational Review, 65(3), 380-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2012.659454

Bovill, C., Bulley, C. J., & Morss, K. (2011). Engaging and Empowering First-Year Students through Curriculum Design: Perspectives from the Literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.515024

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as Co-Creators of Teaching Approaches, Course Design, and Curricula: Implications for Academic Developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Student-staff partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551

Douglas Smith, C., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.598636

Eddy, P. L., & Lawrence, A. (2013). Wikis as Platforms for Authentic Assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9239-7  

Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287  

Forsyth, H., & Evans, J. (2019). Authentic assessment for a more inclusive history. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(4), 748-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1581140

Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Penguin.

Hardarson, A. (2017). Aims of Education:  How to Resist the Temptation of Technocratic Models. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12182  

Honneth, A. (1996). Struggle for Recognition. Polity Press.

Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as Recognition:  A Response to Nancy Fraser. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.), Redistribution or Recognition?  A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 110-197). Verso.

Honneth, A. (2004a). A social pathology of reason:  on the intellectual legacy of Critical Theory. In F. Rush (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory (pp. 336-360). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521816602.014  

Honneth, A. (2004b). Recognition and justice: outline of a plural theory of justice. Acta sociologica, 47(4), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699304048668  

Honneth, A. (2010). The Political Identity of the Green Movement in Germany:  Social-Philosophical Reflections. Critical Horizons, 11(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1558/crit.v11i1.5  

Horkheimer, M. (1993). Between Philosophy and Social Science:  Selected Early Writings. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1565.001.0001

James, L. T., & Casidy, R. (2018). Authentic assessment in business education: its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behaviour. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1165659  

Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582  

McArthur, J. (2011). Reconsidering the social and economic purposes of higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 737-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.539596   

McArthur, J. (2012). Against standardised experience:  leaving our marks on the palimpsests of disciplinary knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(4), 485-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.711934  

McArthur, J. (2013). Rethinking Knowledge in Higher Education:  Adorno and Social Justice. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/ 10.5040/9781472553225

McArthur, J. (2016). Assessment for Social Justice: the role of assessment in achieving social justice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 967-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429  

McArthur, J. (2018). Assessment for Social Justice. Perspectives and practices within Higher Education. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474236089

McArthur, J. (2020). Assessment for Social Justice: achievement, uncertainty and recognition. In C. Callender, W. Locke, & S. Marginson (Eds.), Changing Higher Education for a Changing World. Bloomsbury.

McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). 'Just enough to make you take it seriously': exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education, 65, 677-693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9570-z

McLean, M. (2006). Pedagogy and the University. Critical Theory and Practice. Continuum.

Norton, L. (2004). Using assessment criteria as learning criteria:  a case study in psychology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227236   

Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050025006  

Raymond, J. E., Homer, C. S. E., Smith, R., & Gray, J. E. (2013). Learning through authentic assessment:  An evaluation of a new development in the undergraduate midwifery curriculum. Nurse Education in Practice, 13, 471-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.10.006  

Shay, S. (2008). Beyond social constructivist perspectives on assessment: the centring of knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 595-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334970

Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396  

Winch, C. (2002). Work, Well-being and Vocational Education:  The Ethical Significance of Work and Preparation for Work. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 19(3), 261 - 271. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.t01-1-00222

##submission.downloads##

已出版

2020-10-20

期

卷 26 编号 1 (2020): Monográfico: Evaluación en la Educación Superior

栏目

Monográfico

##submission.license##

Los autores ceden de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación de los trabajos publicados a RELIEVE (a los solos efectos de favorecer la difusión de los artículos publicados:firmar contratos de difusión, de integración en bases de datos, etc.) y consienten que se distribuyan bajo la licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-Uso No Comercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0), que permite a terceros el uso de lo publicado siempre que se mencione la autoría de la obra y la fuente de publicación, y se haga uso sin fines comerciales.

Los autores pueden llegar a otros acuerdos contractuales adicionales e independientes, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo, incluyéndolo en un repositorio institucional o publicándolo en un libro), siempre y cuando se cite claramente que la fuente original de publicación es esta revista.

A los autores se les anima a difundir su trabajo después de publicado, a través de internet (por ejemplo, en archivos institucionales en línea o en su página web) lo que puede generar intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas del trabajo.

La mera remisión del artículo a RELIEVE supone la aceptación de estas condiciones.