Challenges to quality and equity in educational performance for Latin America, a PISA 2012 perspective
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8273关键词:
PISA, Latin American countries, OECD, high and low performers, advantaged and disadvantaged families.摘要
This paper analyses the educational performance of eight PISA 2012 Latin American countries relative to the OECD focusing on equity in the distribution of outcomes. We consider first the results of those countries in terms of the shares of high and low performing students. Next we study how much those performances depend on the students’ family background. We use the data on mathematical competencies in PISA 2012 and compare the results of those students coming from disadvantaged and advantaged families, identified with those in the first and fourth quartiles of the distribution of the index of Economic and Socio-Cultural Status. The main results of this study are: (i) The differences in the educational systems between Latin American countries and the OECD are much larger than suggested by country rankings based on mean performance. (ii) The share of Latin American students exhibiting high performance is extremely thin, particularly among disadvantaged students, whereas low performance is pervasive across all students regardless of family background. (ii) Socio-economic conditions strongly determine high performance, much more than in the OECD.参考
Arneson, R.J. (1989). Equality and equality of opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies, 56: 77-93.
Carvalho, M., Gamboa, L.F. & Waltenberg, F.D. (2015). Equality of educational opportunity: Taking both achievement and access into account. Ecineq working paper 2012-277.
Checchi, D. & Peragine, V. (2010). Inequality of opportunity in Italy. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8: 429-450. DOI: 10.1007/s10888-009-9118-3
Cohen, G.A. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99(4): 906-944.
Ferreira, F. & Gignoux, J. (2011a). The measurement of educational inequality: Achievement and opportunity. Ecineq working paper nº 240. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5873
Ferreira, F. H. G. & Gignoux, J. (2011b). The measurement of inequality of opportunity: Theory and an application to Latin America. Review of Income and Wealth, 57 : 622-657. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2011.00467.x
Gamboa, L. F. & F.D. Waltenberg. (2011). Measuring inequality of opportunity in education by combining information on coverage and achievement in PISA. Educational Assessment, 20 : 320-337. DOI:10.1080/10627197.2015.1093926
Gamboa, L. F. and F.D. Waltenberg. (2012), Inequality of opportunity in educational achievement in Latin America: Evidence from PISA 2006-2009. Economics of Education Review, 31: 694-708. DOI: doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.05.002
Lefranc, A., N. Pistolesi, and A. Trannoy. (2009). Equality of Opportunity and Luck: Definitions and Testable Conditions, with an Application to Income in France. Journal of Public Economics, 93 : 1189-1207. DOI: doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.07.008
Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y. & Willms, D.J. (2010). The relative and absolute risks of disadvantaged family background and low levels of school resources on student literacy. Economics of Education Review, 29 : 214-224. DOI: doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.07.007
OECD. (2014). What students know and can do. Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2016). Low performing Students. Why they fall behind and how to help them suceed. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Roemer, J.E. (1993). A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(2): 146-166.
Roemer, J.E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. New York: Harvard U. Press.
Tansel, A. (2015). Inequality of opportunities in educational achievements in Turkey over time. IZA: working paper DP 9005.
Villar, A. (2016). How bad is being poor for educational performance? A message from PISA 2012. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, vol. 3, n. 3, 2016. DOI:10.14738/assrj.33.1908.
Willms, D. J. (2006). Learning divides: Ten policy questions about the performance and equity of schools and schooling systems. Montreal: UNESCO.
##submission.downloads##
已出版
期
栏目
##submission.license##
Los autores ceden de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación de los trabajos publicados a RELIEVE (a los solos efectos de favorecer la difusión de los artículos publicados:firmar contratos de difusión, de integración en bases de datos, etc.) y consienten que se distribuyan bajo la licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-Uso No Comercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0), que permite a terceros el uso de lo publicado siempre que se mencione la autoría de la obra y la fuente de publicación, y se haga uso sin fines comerciales.
Los autores pueden llegar a otros acuerdos contractuales adicionales e independientes, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo, incluyéndolo en un repositorio institucional o publicándolo en un libro), siempre y cuando se cite claramente que la fuente original de publicación es esta revista.
A los autores se les anima a difundir su trabajo después de publicado, a través de internet (por ejemplo, en archivos institucionales en línea o en su página web) lo que puede generar intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas del trabajo.
La mera remisión del artículo a RELIEVE supone la aceptación de estas condiciones.