How not to Resist the Natural Kind Talk in Biology

Authors

  • María J. Ferreira Ruiz Universitat de València

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.6.1.14824

Abstract

Abstract: After the dawn of the traditional, essentialist view of natural kinds in contemporary philosophy (exacerbated in philosophy of biology by “population thinking”), non-essentialist cluster conceptions of natural kinds have been extensively supported and applied to numerous biological categories. However, salient philosophers have put forward two challenging arguments against cluster kind theories. I argue that, in both cases, discontent with a cluster conception of natural kinds is motivated by tacit and previous assumptions that can be challenged. I conclude that the concerns expressed in the objections do not make good reasons to resist natural kinds talk in biology unless one is willing to share such commitments and assumptions with respect to natural kinds. Ultimately, the discussion can be used to point out that our very expectations regarding natural kinds theories could use a rethink.

Keywords: natural kinds, essentialism, cluster kinds, Boyd, mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-24

How to Cite

Ferreira Ruiz, M. J. (2019). How not to Resist the Natural Kind Talk in Biology. Quaderns De Filosofia, 6(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.6.1.14824
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    578
  • PDF
    453

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2019): Philosophy of Biology

Section

Research Papers

License

Works published in QUADERNS DE FILOSOFIA are under the licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

The authors authorize the publisher to archive the article into databases and indexes (such as EBSCO, DOAJ, ProQuest), and permit the publisher to apply DOI to the article.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Metrics