Reivindicaciones del crédito epistémico en el contexto social

Authors

  • Jesús Navarro Universitat de València

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.9.2.22952

Abstract

Claims of epistemic credit in social context

Resumen: En este ensayo explico la propuesta fundamental de Conocimiento expropiado (Broncano 2020) en el marco agencial y fiabilista que asume el autor. A continuación, me centro en su análisis de las situaciones de injusticia testimonial, contraponiendo los caminos seguidos por Miranda Fricker (enfocado en el prejuicio del intercambio testimonial) y Broncano (enfocado en el desajuste estructural). Tras señalar las deficiencias de cada modelo, apunto una propuesta alternativa: la injusticia testimonial se produce cuando la atribución de credibilidad es efecto de un juicio identitario, ya sea este ajustado o no, con respecto al colectivo al que pertenece la testigo.

Abstract: In this essay, I explain the main claim of Conocimiento expropiado (Broncano 2020) against the background of the agential and reliabilist framework that its author assumes. I then focus on his analysis of situations of testimonial injustice, opposing Miranda Fricker’s approach (focused on prejudice in testimonial exchanges) and Broncano’s one (focused on structural imbalances). By pointing out the shortcommings of both models, I skech an alternative proposal: testimonial injustice is produced when the credibility assessment results from an identity judgment, whether it is effectively appropriate regarding the collective or not.

Palabras clave: Epistemología política, fiabilismo agencial, injusticia testimonial, credibilidad.

Keywords: Political Epistemology, agent reliabilism, testimonial injustice, credibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayala-López, S. 2018, “A Structural Explanation of Injustice in Conversations: It’s about Norms”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 99 (4): 726-48.

Broncano, F. 2020, Conocimiento expropiado: epistemología política en una democracia radical, Madrid: Akal.

Carmona, C. 2021, “Silencing by Not Telling Testimonial Void as a New Kind of Testimonial Injustice”, Social Epistemology: 17.

Craig, E. 1999, Knowledge and the State of Nature, Oxford: OUP.

Conee, E. y Feldman, R. 2013, “El problema de la generalidad para el fiabilismo”, en C. L. García, Á. Eraña y P. King Dávalos (ed.), Teorías contemporáneas de la justificación epistémica, México: UNAM.

Dotson, K. 2012, “A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression”, Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33 (1): 24.

Fricker, M. 2017, Injusticia epistémica, Barcelona: Herder.

Medina, J. 2012, The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations, Oxford: OUP.

Mills, Ch. W. 2007, “White Ignorance”, en S. Sullivan y N. Tuana (ed.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance, Albany: SUNY Press, 13-38.

Navarro, J. 2015, “No achievement beyond intention: A new defence of robust virtue epistemology”, Synthese, 192 (10): 3339-69. 

Navarro, J. 2021, “Epistemic Luck and Epistemic Risk”, Erkenntnis, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00387-9.

Pundik, A. 2021, “Rethinking the Use of Statistical Evidence to Prove Causation in Criminal Cases: A Tale of (Im)Probability and Free Will”, Law and Philosophy, 40 (2): 97-128.

Smith, M. 2018, “When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?”, Mind, 127 (508): 1193-218.

Sosa, E. 2015, Judgment and Agency, Oxford: OUP.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-29

How to Cite

Navarro, J. (2022). Reivindicaciones del crédito epistémico en el contexto social. Quaderns De Filosofia, 9(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.9.2.22952
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    418
  • PDF (Español)
    223

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Simposio "Conocimiento expropiado"

License

Works published in QUADERNS DE FILOSOFIA are under the licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

The authors authorize the publisher to archive the article into databases and indexes (such as EBSCO, DOAJ, ProQuest), and permit the publisher to apply DOI to the article.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Metrics