Gerald A. Cohen y Elizabeth Anderson. Sobre el igualitarismo pluralista de Jesús Mora
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.9.2.24421Abstract
Gerald A. Cohen and Elizabeth Anderson. On the pluralist egalitarianism of Jesús Mora
Resumen: Este trabajo pretende exponer y discutir la propuesta de desarrollar un igualitarismo pluralista tal y como la presenta Jesús Mora en su reciente libro titulado ¿Igualdad para qué? Una propuesta de igualitarismo pluralista para el siglo XXI (Dykinson, 2021). Para ello, nos detenemos a analizar lo que consideramos son sus dos hilos argumentales fundamentales, a saber, el igualitarismo distributivo de J. Rawls y G. A. Cohen y el igualitarismo relacional de E. Anderson. Concluimos nuestras reflexiones haciendo hincapié en lo que creemos que son los puntos fuertes del texto de Jesús Mora y cuestionamos a través de las reflexiones de E. Anderson sobre la igualdad democrática si realmente es viable la defensa de un igualitarismo de doble base que presenta J. Mora en su texto.
Abstract: This paper aims to expose and discuss the proposal to develop a pluralist egalitarianism as presented by Jesús Mora in his recent book entitled: ¿Igualdad para qué? Una propuesta de igualitarismo pluralista para el siglo XXI (Dykinson, 2021). In order to do so, we analyse what we consider to be its two fundamental threads of argument, namely the distributive egalitarianism of J. Rawls and G. A. Cohen and the relational egalitarianism of E. Anderson. We conclude our reflections by emphasising what we believe to be the strong points of Jesús Mora’s text and we question, through E. Anderson’s reflections on democratic equality, whether the defence of a two-pronged egalitarianism presented by J. Mora in his text is really viable.
Palabras clave: Distribución, imparcialidad, poder, exclusión y vulnerabilidad.
Keywords: Distribution, fairness, power, exclusion and vulnerability.
Downloads
References
Anderson, E. 1999, “What is the Point of Equality?”, Ethics, 109 (2): 287-337.
Anderson, E. 2016, “¿Cuál es el punto de la igualdad?”, en J. Gallego y T. Bullemore (ed.), Igualitarismo. Una discusión necesaria, Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos, 45-103.
Cohen, G. A. 2008, Rescuing Justice and Equality, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, G. A. 2009, Why Not Socialism?, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cohen, G. A. 2014, Por una vuelta al socialismo o cómo el capitalismo nos hace menos libres, Argentina: Siglo XXI.
Gilabert, P. 2012, “Cohen on Socialism, Equality and Community”, Socialist Studies, 8 (1): 101-21.
Kymlicka, W. 1995, Filosofía política contemporánea. Una introducción, Barcelona: Ariel Ciencia Política.
Marx, K. 1956 y ss, Karl Marx Friedrich Engels Werke (MEW), Berlín: Dietz Verlag.
Marx, K. 1971, Crítica del programa de Gotha, Madrid: Ricardo Aguilera.
Mora, J. 2021, ¿Igualdad para qué? Una propuesta de igualitarismo pluralista para el siglo XXI, Madrid: Dykinson.
Rawls, J. 1999, A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. 2012, La justicia como equidad. Una reformulación, Barcelona: Paidós.
Roemer, J. E. 1998, “Igualdad de oportunidades”, Isegoría, 18: 71-87.
Van Parijs, P. 2003, “Difference Principles”, en S. Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200-40.
Vrousalis, N. 2010, “G. A. Cohen’s Vision of Socialism”, The Journal of Ethics, 14 (3/4): 185-216.
Young, I. M. 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract405
-
PDF (Español)459
Issue
Section
License
Works published in QUADERNS DE FILOSOFIA are under the licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The authors authorize the publisher to archive the article into databases and indexes (such as EBSCO, DOAJ, ProQuest), and permit the publisher to apply DOI to the article.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).