¿Distribución o reconocimiento? Un análisis a partir de John Rawls

Authors

  • Pablo Andrés Aguayo Westwood Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.2.2.4309

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that Rawls’s conception of distributive justice goes beyond allocative justice and has sound arguments to deal with claims for recognition. I suggest that some critics of the distributive paradigm confuse “allocative justice” and “distributive justice”. In doing so, they not only reduce Rawls’s conception of primary goods to economic factors, but they also fail to grasp the moral and political perspective of the Rawlsian project, thus cutting out essential dimensions of justice. At the end of this paper, I discuss the Rawlsian concepts of reciprocal recognition and self-respect in order to present a conception of distributive justice able to meet these questions.

Keywords: Rawls, allocative justice, distributive justice, reciprocal recognition, selfrespect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pablo Andrés Aguayo Westwood, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Chile

Profesor Asistente de Filosofía Moral, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Chile. Master en Epistemología y Master en Ética y Democracia. Actualmente cursando el Doctorado en Ética y Democracia en la Universidad de Valencia

Published

2015-09-28

How to Cite

Aguayo Westwood, P. A. (2015). ¿Distribución o reconocimiento? Un análisis a partir de John Rawls. Quaderns De Filosofia, 2(2), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.2.2.4309
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    804
  • PDF (Español)
    524
  • PDF
    108
  • PDF (Català)
    134

Issue

Section

Research Papers

Metrics