La justícia global: una resposta alternativa a la desigualtat i la pobresa extrema
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.3.1.8139Abstract
Abstract: This paper presents the possibility of defending proposals of global justice as an alternative to the existing international justice solutions to the problem of inequality and extreme poverty in the world. We believe that the response to such situations should not be humanitarian but in terms of justice, otherwise those who suffer extreme poverty and inequality do not become recognized as worthy and valuable beings and their basic freedoms are not guaranteed. I succinctly present two proposals for global justice: Thomas Pogge’s, which is in line with Rawls but widening the perspective of the Law of Nations at the global level, and Amartya Sen’s, which is based on the capability approach and focuses justice on the real freedom of individuals.
Keywords: global justice, international justice, extreme poverty, Pogge, Sen.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract637
-
PDF (Català)309
-
PDF (Español)143
-
PDF96
Issue
Section
License
Works published in QUADERNS DE FILOSOFIA are under the licence Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The authors authorize the publisher to archive the article into databases and indexes (such as EBSCO, DOAJ, ProQuest), and permit the publisher to apply DOI to the article.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).