Industrial Policies for Reverting the Premature Deindustrialization of the Brazilian Economy: an agenda for policy discussion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/IREP.6.1.29171Abstract
This article explores the path of Brazil's manufacturing sector, focusing on the process of deindustrialization, and delving into the historical evolution of industrial policies, especially the more recent initiatives, dating back to Lula's first government in the beginning of the 21st century, and their outcomes. The paper advocates for a strategic industrial policy agenda designed to move Brazil towards reindustrialization, thereby fostering sustained, long-term economic growth. By analysing the manufacturing sector’s historical record and examining the prevailing industrial policy agenda in Brazil, alongside insights from some developed nations actively pursuing reindustrialization, this study proposes a forward-looking industrial policy plan. Tailored to address Brazil's unique challenges and opportunities, the paper serves as a roadmap for policymakers, offering actionable recommendations to revitalize the industrial landscape. In summary, the paper unravels the manufacturing sector’s complexities, offering a better understanding of deindustrialization, industrial policy agendas and its tendencies, for both Brazil and globally, providing a proactive industrial policy plan for the country. This multifaceted examination provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, facilitating well-informed decision-making for the country to regain sustainable economic growth.
Downloads
References
Aiginger, K., & Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20, 189–207.
Bonelli, R., Pessoa, S., & Matos, S. (2013). Desindustrialização no Brasil: fatos e interpretação. In E. Bacha & M. B. Bolle (Eds.), O Futuro da Indústria no Brasil: desindustrialização em debate (pp. 189–207). Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C., Oreiro, J. L., & Marconi, N. (2015). Developmental Macroeconomics: new developmentalism as a growth strategy. London: Routledge.
Cano, W., & Silva, A. L. G. (2010). Política industrial do governo Lula. Texto para Discussão, Instituto de Economia da Unicamp, (181), 139-174.
Clark, C. (1957). The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: Macmillan.
Coronel, D. A., Azevedo, A. F. Z. D., Campos, A. C. (2014). Política industrial e desenvolvimento econômico: a reatualização de um debate histórico. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 34(1), 103-119.
Confederação Nacional da Indústria - CNI. (2023). Plano de Retomada da Indústria. Retrieved from https://static.portaldaindustria.com.br/media/filer_public/99/4c/994c17a5-e837-4aea-9de5-54048ec499b5/plano_de_retomada_9mai23_web.pdf.
Nassif, A. (2008). Há evidências de desindustrialização no Brasil? Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 28(1), 72-96.
Nassif, A., Morceiro, P. C. (2021). Industrial policy for prematurely deindustrialized economies after the Covid-19 pandemic crisis: Integrating economic, social and environmental goals with policy proposals for Brazil. Textos para Discussão, 351.
Oreiro, J.L; Paula, L.F. (2021). A Macroeconomia da Estagnação Brasileira. Alta Books: Rio de Janeiro.
Oreiro J.L., Manarin D’Agostini L.L., Gala P. (2020),” Deindustrialization, economic complexity and exchange rate overvaluation: the case of Brazil (1998-2017)”, PSL Quarterly Review, 73 (295):313 341.
Oreiro, J. L; Feijó, C. A. (2010). Desindustrialização: conceituação, causas, efeitos e o caso brasileiro., Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 30(2), 219-232.
Palma, J. G. (2005). Four sources of deindustrialization and a new concept of the Dutch disease. In J. A. Ocampo (Ed.), Beyond Reforms. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Pinheiro, M. C. (2015). A recente política industrial brasileira foi bem desenhada? In N. Barbosa, N. Marconi, M. C. Pinheiro, & L. Carvalho (Eds.), Indústria e Desenvolvimento Produtivo no Brasil (pp. 443-466). Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Rodrik, D. (2015). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21, 1–33.
Rowthorn, R. E.; Wells, J. R. (1987). De-industrialization and Foreign Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowthorn, R.; Ramaswamy, R. (1999). Growth, Trade and Deindustrialization. IMF Staff Papers, 46(1), 18-41.
Schymura, L., & Pinheiro, M. C. (2013). Política industrial brasileira: motivações e diretrizes. In E. Bacha & M. B. Bolle (Eds.), O Futuro da Indústria no Brasil: desindustrialização em debate.
Soares, C. S., Coronel, D. A., & Marion Filho, P. J. (2013). A recente política industrial brasileira: da “Política de Desenvolvimento Produtivo” ao “Plano Brasil Maior”. Perspectivas Contemporâneas, 8(1), 1-20.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2023, May 31). Western Industrial Policy and International Law. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-europe-industrial-policies-international-law-level-playing-field-by-joseph-e-stiglitz-2023-05.
Tregenna, F. (2009). Characterising Deindustrialisation: An Analysis of Changes in Manufacturing Employment and Output Internationally. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(3), 433-466.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development - UNCTAD. (2008). Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Revision 4. Statistical papers. Series M. No. 4/Rev.4. United Nations: New York. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf.
UNIDO. (2023). Industrial Analytics Platform. Retrieved from https://iap.unido.org/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract96
-
PDF44
Issue
Section
License
Copyright is the right exercised by the creator over his/her literary and artistic work. The owner of the copyright is, as a rule, the person who creates the work, which is to say the author. In Copyright Law, the author is considered to be “the natural person who creates a literary, artistic or scientific piece of work”. Although in principle it is only natural or physical persons who may be considered to be authors, the law foresaw certain cases in which legal persons could also benefit from these rights.
Authorship is irrevocable; it may not be transmitted either inter vivos or in the form of a testamentary trust; it does not disappear with the passage of time nor is it public domain; it is not subject to the statute of limitations.
Copyright Law has a dual nature; it covers moral rights (paternity, integrity, dissemination…), and property rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation):
Moral rights (article 14 of the Spanish Copyright Law). These refer to acknowledgement of authorship. They are irrevocable and inalienable and correspond to the right to:
- Decide whether his/her work is to be disseminated and how.
- Acknowledge authorship of the work.
- Demand respect for the integrity of the work.
- Modify the work while being respectful of the rights acquired.
- Withdraw the work from sale, without prejudice to compensation for damages to the owners of the right of use.
- Access the single,unique copy of the work that is held by a third party
Property rights (articles 18 to 25 of the Spanish Copyright Law). They refer to the four types of right of use. They allow the owner of the work to obtain financial compensation for the third-party use of his/her work:
- Reproduction: obtaining of copies of all or part of the work.
- Distribution: the public availability of the work through its sale, rental, loan or by any other means.
- Public Communication: action through which a group of people may have access to the work.
- Transformation: the translation, adaptation and any other modification of the work, leading, or not, to new work derived from it.