Sex and design in our evolutionary cousins: The perception of beauty in nature

Authors

  • Tamra C. Mendelson University of Maryland, Baltimore (USA).
  • Michael J. Ryan University of Texas, Austin (USA).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24202

Keywords:

beauty, neuroaesthetics, perceptual fluency, sensory bias, sexual selection

Abstract

Taking an evolutionary approach to the question of beauty, we discuss the expression and perception of sexual beauty across the animal kingdom. Animals experience beauty in their brains, and animal brains are tuned to features of the environment most relevant to their survival. Over evolutionary time, sexually reproducing animals have exploited that tuning to maximize their attractiveness to the opposite sex, often leading to extreme courtship traits and behaviors. These are the traits of sexual beauty. Combining modern principles of neuroscience and neuroaesthetics with established principles of evolutionary biology, we aim to understand the biological basis and evolution of beauty in all animals, including ourselves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tamra C. Mendelson, University of Maryland, Baltimore (USA).

Professor at the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County (USA). Her research focuses on the causes and consequences of evolutionary change in communication systems. She tries to understand why male colour patterns have diversified so extensively in darters, and the consequences of that divergence.

Michael J. Ryan, University of Texas, Austin (USA).

Professor at the Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin (USA). Most of his work has addressed sexual selection and communication in frogs and fish. He is especially interested in integrating an understanding of the mechanisms of communication involved in mate attraction with the evolutionary consequences of sexual selection. In 2018, he published A taste for the beautiful: The evolution of attraction (Princeton University Press).

References

Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Research Reviews, 28(3), 309–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00019-8

Bilger, H. T., Vertosick, E., Vickers, A., Kaczmarek, K., & Prum, R. O. (2021). Higher-order musical temporal structure in bird song. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629456

Changizi, M. A., Zhang, Q., Ye, H., & Shimojo, S. (2006). The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist, 167(5), E117–E139. https://doi.org/10.1086/502806

Cummings, M. E., & Endler, J. A. (2018). 25 years of sensory drive: The evidence and its watery bias. Current Zoology, 64(4), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy043

Dai, X., Brendl, C. M., & Ariely, D. (2010). Wanting, liking, and preference construction. Emotion, 10(3), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017987

Daniel, M. J., Koffinas, L., & Hughes, K. A. (2019). Habituation underpins preference for mates with novel phenotypes in the guppy. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286, 20190435. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0435

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.

Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. John Murray.

Dong, S., & Clayton, D. F. (2009). Habituation in songbirds. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.009

Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J.-G. J. (1992). Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 249, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0101

Hartshorne, C. (1973). Born to sing. Indiana University Press.

Hoke, K. L., Ryan, M. J., & Wilczynski, W. (2010). Sexually dimorphic sensory gating drives behavioral differences in túngara frogs. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213(20), 3463–3472. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.043992

Holzleitner, I. J., Lee, A. J., Hahn, A. C., Kandrik, M., Bovet, J., Renoult, J. P., Simmons, D., Garrod, O., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2019). Comparing theory-driven and data-driven attractiveness models using images of real women’s faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 45(12), 1589–1595. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000685

Houde, A. E. (1997). Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press.

Hulse, S. V., Renoult, J. P., & Mendelson, T. C. (2020). Sexual signaling pattern correlates with habitat pattern in visually ornamented fishes. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16389-0

Lynch, K. S., & Ryan, M. J. (2020). Understanding the role of incentive salience in sexual decision-making. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 60(3), 712–721. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa054

Maney, D. L. (2013). The incentive salience of courtship vocalizations: Hormone-mediated 'wanting' in the auditory system. Hearing Research, 305(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.04.011

Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: How Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world-and us. Doubleday.

Renoult, J. P., Bovet, J., & Raymond, M. (2016). Beauty is in the efficient coding of the beholder. Royal Society Open Science, 3(3), 160027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160027

Renoult, J. P., & Mendelson, T. C. (2019). Processing bias: Extending sensory drive to include efficacy and efficiency in information processing. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1900), 20190165. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0165

Richards, E. (2017). Darwin and the making of sexual selection. University of Chicago Press.

Rosenthal, G. G. (2017). Mate choice: The evolution of sexual decision making from microbes to humans. Princeton University Press.

Rosenthal, G. G., & Ryan, M. J. (2022). Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin. Science, 375, eabi6308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6308

Ryan, M. J. (2018). A taste for the beautiful. Princeton University Press.

Sibeaux, A., Cole, G. L., & Endler, J. A. (2019). The relative importance of local and global visual contrast in mate choice. Animal Behaviour, 154, 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.06.020

Street, S. E., Morgan, T. J. H., Thornton, A., Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Cross, C. P. (2018). Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8

Von Uexküll, J. (2014). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Springer-Verlag.

Wilczynski, W., Rand, A. S., & Ryan, M. J. (2001). Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 58(3), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047268

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-02-23

How to Cite

Mendelson, T. C., & Ryan, M. J. (2023). Sex and design in our evolutionary cousins: The perception of beauty in nature. Metode Science Studies Journal, (13), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.13.24202
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1111
  • PDF
    656
  • (Español)
    0

Issue

Section

Beauty and nature

Metrics

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.