La limitación práctica de la filosofía trascendental en la primera recepción de la KrV
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/REK.5.1.13993Abstract
Se aborda la polémica que despierta la recepción temprana de la KrV. El trabajo analiza las reseñas Garve/Feder (1782) y Garve (1783), y en él se expone que, más allá del error cometido por Feder de interpretar el idealismo trascendental del mismo modo que el de Berkeley, ambas reseñas mantienen dos objeciones contra la KrV relacionadas entre sí, a saber, el alcance popular de la obra y su orientación práctica. Se muestra la pertinencia de estas objeciones en la medida en que Kant lo hace, al reconocer que el impacto práctico del idealismo trascendental se halla fuera de la KrV y de las “consideraciones trascendentales” que este mismo idealismo inaugura.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract385
-
PDF (Español)311
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
- The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work and to license it under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of its authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately establish additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).