Visibility, impact and knowledge transfer in scientific education journals: The experience of Aula Magna 2.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.2.17616Keywords:
Scholarly communication, Information dissemination, Social media, Knowledge transfer, Impact, BloggingAbstract
The value to society of the transfer of scientific knowledge is indisputable, however, it is essential to uncover effective transfer strategies in order to generate social and educational impact. This article aims to analyse the relevance and impact of the dissemination of scientific articles on the science development process and its transfer to society. This study also reflects on the use of new dissemination channels to increase the visibility and transfer of scientific developments. Specifically, it explores the analytics of the blog used by the Aula Magna 2.0 consortium as a science dissemination resource to generate impact.
The article follows a descriptive quantitative methodology that is based on an empirical analysis of data collective from the collaborative academic blog of the aforementioned consortium. It examines the potential of this blog to promote visibility, impact and knowledge transfer in the context of scientific education journals.
The main findings highlight the relevance of new scientific communication channels, as well as the need for new indicators and criteria for assessing academic and social impact. These new channels increase research visibility and provide opportunities to transfer produced knowledge by adapting the communicative approach, format and style to different target groups. In the case of the Aula Magna 2.0 blog, the data presented allows us to conclude that it is a valuable tool for disseminating knowledge through a collaboration strategy, while also generating social and educational impact.
References
Abadal, E. (ed.) (2017). Revistas científicas: situación actual y retos de futuro. Ediciones Universitat de Barcelona.
Arcila-Calderón, C., Calderín-Cruz, M., & Sánchez-Holgado, P. (2019). Adopción de redes sociales por revistas científicas de ciencias sociales. El profesional de la información, 28(1), https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.05
Arroyo, N., & Guallar, J. (2019). Estrategia en medios sociales para revistas académicas. IX Conferencia sobre revistas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades. http://www.crecs.info/crecs2019-logro%C3%B1o/
Barton, C. J., & Merolli, M. A. (2019). It is time to replace publish or perish with get visible or vanish: opportunities where digital and social media can reshape knowledge translation. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(10), 594-598. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098367
Chaparro, L. (2018). Libro verde de la Ciencia. Madrid: FECYT: https://www.fecyt.es/es/publicacion/libro-verde-de-las-ferias-de-ciencia
Collins, K, Shiffman, D., & Rock, J. (2016) How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace? PLoS one, 11(10), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162680
Dinu, N. R., & Baiget, T. (2019). Presente y futuro de las revistas científicas. Scire, 25(1), 37-46.
Escobar-Ortiz, J.M., & Rincón-Álvarez, A. (2019). La divulgación científica y sus modelos comunicativos: algunas reflexiones teóricas para la enseñanza de las ciencias. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, 10(1), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.21501/22161201.3062
European Commission (2018). Monitoring the Impact of the EU Framework Programmes. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/518781
Flecha, R. (2018). Evaluación del impacto social de la investigación. Revista de Fomento Social, 73(3–4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.32418/rfs.2019.291-292.1514
Fuentes, J. L., Luque, D., & López-Gómez, E. (2012). Análisis bibliométrico de las revistas españolas de educación incluidas en el Journal Citation Report. Producción científica y elementos controvertidos. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 24(1), 183-217. https://doi.org/10.14201/10337
Gardner, T., & Inger, S. (2018). How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Publications: Trends on reader behaviour 2015-2018. Renew Publishing Consultants. https://renewconsultants.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/How-Readers-Discover-Content-2018-Published-180903.pdf
Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisis de datos cualitativos en investigación cualitativa. Morata.
Giménez, E. (2018). La evaluación de las Humanidades y de las Ciencias Sociales en revisión. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 41(3) https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.3.1552
Gómez-Ferri, J., & González-Alcaide, G. (2018). Patrones y estrategias en la colaboración científica: la percepción de los investigadores. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 41(1) https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.1.1458
Green, T. (2019). Publication is not enough, to generate impact you need a campaign. LSE Blog [Blog]. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/09/27/publication-is-not-enough-to-generate-impact-you-need-to-campaign/
Guallar, J. (2009). Blogs en publicaciones periódicas y científicas en España: dos situaciones divergentes. El caso del" blog" de" EPI". Anuario ThinkEPI, 1, 75-87.
Hargreaves, A., & Sugrue, C. (2016). By book and by blog: the future of academic scholarship. En C. Sugrue & S. Merkan (eds.). Publishing and the Academic World: Passion, Purpose and Possible Futures. (pp. 13-25). Routledge.
Jamali, H. R., & Alimohammadi, D. (2015). Blog Citations as Indicators of the Societal Impact of Research. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development and Technology, 5(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2015.5.1.015
Ke, Q., Ahn, Y.Y., & Sugimoto, C.R. (2017). A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter. PLoS one, 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175368
Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2016). Education scholars’ evolving uses of twitter as a conference backchannel and social commentary platform. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12428
Marauri-Castillo, I., Cantalapiedra-González, M-J., & Álvarez-Fernández, C. (2018). Blog y Twitter, la combinación perfecta del comunicador digital: los casos de Escolar.net, El comidista y Mi mesa cojea. El profesional de la información, 27(2), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.13
Márquez, A., Ordorika, I., Díaz Barriga, Á., Cantoral, R., & de Vries, W. (2016). Editorial. Consorcio Mexicano de Revistas de Investigación Educativa. Revista de la Educación Superior, 177, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2016.04.002
Maz-Machado, A., Gutiérrez-Arenas, M. P., Bracho-López, R., Jiménez-Fanjul, N., Adamuz-Povedano, N., & Torralbo, M. (2011). Producción científica en Ciencias Sociales de las mujeres en Andalucía (2003-2007). Aula Abierta, 39(3), 63-72.
McNamara, P., & Usher, K. (2019). Share or perish: social media and the international journal of mental health nursing. International journal of mental health nursing, 28(4), 960-970. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12600
Mengual, S. (2018). Videoabstract e infografía como nuevas oportunidades de la comunicación científica en Ciencias de la Educación. Aula Magna 2.0. [Blog]. https://cuedespyd.hypotheses.org/4601
Mewburn, I., & Thomson, P. (2013). Why do academics blog? An analysis of audiences, purposes and challenges. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1105-1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.835624
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Kwasny, M., & Holmes, K. L. (2018). Academic information on Twitter: A user survey. PloS one, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265
Niles, M. T., Schimanski, L. A., McKiernan, E. C., & Alperin, J. P. (2020). Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations. PloS one, 15(3), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228914
Pfleegor, A. G., Katz, M., & Bowers, M. T. (2019). Publish, perish, or salami slice? Authorship ethics in an emerging field. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3578-3
Phillips, A. (2010). “Blog to the future?” Journals publishing in the twenty-first century. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.42.1.16
Pieris, D. I. (2019). Why I Write for Academic Blogs. University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine, 9(1), 17-19. https://doi.org/10.18192/uojm.v9i1.3984
Pulido, C. M., Redondo-Sama, G., Sordé-Martí, T., & Flecha, R. (2018). Social impact in social media: A new method to evaluate the social impact of research. PLoS one, 13(8), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203117
Real Decreto 1086/1989, sobre retribuciones del profesorado universitario. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 216, 28653-28656.
Robinson, N., Delgado López-Cózar, E., & Torres Salinas, D. (2011). Cómo comunicar y diseminar información científica en Internet para obtener mayor visibilidad e impacto. Aula abierta, 39(3), 41-50.
Ruiz-Corbella, M. (2018). De la edición impresa a la digital: la radical transformación de las Revista científicas en ciencias sociales. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76(271), 499-517. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP-3-2018-06
Ruiz-Corbella, M., Galán, A., & Diestro, A. (2014). Las revistas científicas de Educación en España: evolución y perspectivas de futuro. Revista electrónica de investigación y evaluación educativa, RELIEVE, 20(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.20.2.4361
Ruiz-Corbella, M., & García-Gutiérrez, J. (2019). Aprendizaje-Servicio en escenarios digitales de aprendizaje: propuesta innovadora en la educación superior. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 23(1), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.23.1.24391
Salinas, J., & Marín Juarros, V.I. (2019). Metasíntesis cualtitativa sobre colaboración científica e identidad digital académica en redes sociales. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. RIED, 22(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23238
Sánchez-Santamaría, J., & Aliaga, F. (2019). Revistas Científicas de Educación en Redes Sociales y Científicas: presencia, frecuencia, tipo de información y usos. Aula Magna 2.0.[Blog]. http://cuedespyd.hypotheses.org/6439
Santos Rego, M. A. (2020). La transferencia de conocimiento en educación. Un desafío estratégico. Narcea.
Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information. PLoS one, 7(5), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035869
Terama, E., Smallman, M., Lock, S.J., Johnson, C., & Zaltz, M. (2016). Beyond Academia – Interrogating research impact in the research excellence framework. PLoS one, 12(2), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171817
Torres-Salinas, D., & Cabezas-Clavijo, A. (2008). Los blogs como nuevo medio de comunicación científica. III Encuentro Ibérico de Docentes e Investigadores en Información y Documentación [comunicación]. http://ec3.ugr.es/publicaciones/Torres-Salinas,_Daniel_y_Cabezas-Clavijo,_Alvaro._Los_blogs_como_nuevo_medio_de_comunicacion_cientifica.pdf
Weller, M. (2018). The digital scholar revisited. The Digital Scholar: Philosopher's Lab, 1(2), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.5840/dspl20181218
Zou, H., & Hyland, K. (2019). Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs. Discourse Studies, 21(6), 713-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619866983
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors grant non-exclusive rights of exploitation of works published to RELIEVE and consent to be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Use 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published material whenever the authorship of the work and the source of publication is mentioned, and it is used for non-commercial purposes.
The authors can reach other additional and independent contractual agreements, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, by including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), as long as it is clearly stated that the Original source of publication is this magazine.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work after it has been published, through the internet (for example, in institutional archives online or on its website) which can generate interesting exchanges and increase work appointments.
The fact of sending your paper to RELIEVE implies that you accept these conditions.