Authentic assessment: using assessment to help students learn.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.2.7674Keywords:
Assessment, Authentic assessment, learning, higher educationAbstract
Authentic assessment offers students opportunities to learn through the process of assessment itself, if the tasks are chosen for high relevance both to the programme of learning and the ultimate life directions of graduates, in employment, research and personal development. When assessment is designed to articulate clearly with intended learning outcomes, it can have benefits in terms of fostering and deepening student engagement while helping students advance in their skills development and subject knowledge. While setting up and managing authentic assessment tasks can be time- and resource-intensive, it is argued here that the benefits in terms of learning enhancement far outweigh these factors. The article concludes with a manifesto proposing some preconditions for effective and authentic assessment.References
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007) Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Bloxham, S. & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing effective assessment in higher education: a practical guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Brown, S. & Race, P. (2013). Using effective assessment to promote learning in Hunt, L. & Chambers, D. (2012) University Teaching in Focus (74-91). Victoria, Australia: Acer Press.
Dunn, L., Morgan, C., O'Reilly, M., & Parry, S. (2003). The student assessment handbook: New directions in traditional and online assessment. London: Routledge.
Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (eds.), Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches, Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
Hartley, P. (2013). For the Love of Learning: Innovations from Outstanding University Teachers. En T. Bilham (Ed.), For the love of learning: innovations from outstanding teachers [120-126]. London: Palgrave Macmillan
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in higher education, 27(1), 53-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099368
Higher Education Academy (2012). A marked improvement; transforming assessment in higher education. York: HEA.
Meyer, J. & Land, R. (2013). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.
Murphy, R. (2006). Evaluating new priorities in assessment in Higher Education. In C. Bryan, & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (37-46). London: Routledge.
Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education Vol 31(2), 199-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Pickford, R. & Brown, S. (2006). Assessing skills and practice, London: Routledge.
Race P. (2015). The lecturer’s toolkit (4th edition). London: Routledge.
Rust, C., Price, M. & O’Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 28(2), 147-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930301671
Sadler, D. Royce (2010). Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (35)5, 535-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2012). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
Wiggins, G. (1990). The Case for Authentic Assessment. ERIC Digest. Disponible en http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9218/case.htm
University Alliance (2014). Job ready: universities, employers and students creating success http://www.unialliance.ac.uk/job-ready-sector-engineering/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors grant non-exclusive rights of exploitation of works published to RELIEVE and consent to be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Use 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published material whenever the authorship of the work and the source of publication is mentioned, and it is used for non-commercial purposes.
The authors can reach other additional and independent contractual agreements, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, by including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), as long as it is clearly stated that the Original source of publication is this magazine.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work after it has been published, through the internet (for example, in institutional archives online or on its website) which can generate interesting exchanges and increase work appointments.
The fact of sending your paper to RELIEVE implies that you accept these conditions.