Why is intercontinental correlation within the Lower Cambrian so difficult?

Autores/as

  • Allison R. Palmer Universidad de Valencia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/sjp.23974

Palabras clave:

Lower Cambrian, intercontinental correlation, biostratigraphy, trilobites, archaeocyathids.

Resumen

Correlation of Lower Cambrian rocks is hampered because there are no widespread and rapidly evolving organisms such as the later agnostids, graptolites, conodonts, ammonites, or planktonic foramini fers, that might provide the basis for a consistent intercontinental biostratigraphy. Four problems illustrate the issue: 1) the age of the oldest trilobites of China; 2) acritarch correlations between Siberia and Baltica; 3) conflicts between archaeocyath and trilobite correlations; and 4) the location of the Lower Cambrian/Middle Cambrian boundary. There is no basis for an internationally useful set of Lower Cambrian stages at this time.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Descargas

Publicado

2022-02-27

Cómo citar

Palmer, A. R. (2022). Why is intercontinental correlation within the Lower Cambrian so difficult?. Spanish Journal of Palaeontology, 13(3), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.7203/sjp.23974
Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    330
  • PDF
    93

Métrica

Artículos similares

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.