From peculiarity’s rhetoric to disinhibition’s rhetoric: a discursive itinerary of populism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.49.25248

Abstract

The movements for civil rights and sexual or racial equality that lived on American campuses in the 1960s and 1970s encouraged the appearance of political correctness and, with it, the so-called politically correct language, which culminated at the turn of the century with the rhetorics of peculiarity. In these discourses, the incessant attention to difference provokes a continuous split of the electorate/citizenship; collective identification is made difficult by the appeal to individualism. With the emergence of radical right-wing populist parties, similar discursive mechanisms of segmentation of recipients are maintained, but this time the differences that are fostered are reactively (reactionary) constructed, in such a way that minorities are challenged through a disinhibited discourse that seeks identification predominantly through negative, confrontational expressiveness, whose argumentative basis are phobotypes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
2%
33%
Days to publication 
286
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A

Author Biography

Beatriz Gallardo Paúls, Universitat de València

Lingüística general. Departamento de Teoría de los Lenguajes y Ciencias de la Comunicación

References

Allen, Irving Lewis (1995): “Earlier uses of politically (in) correct”, American Speech, 70.1, pp. 110-112.

 

Bush Jr., Harold K. (1995): “A Brief History of PC, with Annotated Bibliopraphy”, American Studies International, 33 (1), pp. 42-64.

 

Charaudeau, Patrick (2005): “Quand l’argumentation n’est que visée persuasive. L’exemple du discours politique”, en Marcel Burger y Guylane Martel (Eds.): Argumentation et communication dans les médias, Québec, Éditions Nota Bene, pp. 23-43.

 

De Lucas Martín, Javier (1990): “Democracia y transparencia. Sobre poder, secreto y publicidad”, Anuario de Filosofía del derecho VII, pp. 131-145.

 

De Lucas Martín, Javier (2002): “La nueva Ley de Extranjería como rechazo de la integración de los inmigrantes”. En Pilar Almoguera (Coord.): De sur a sur: análisis multidisciplinar del fenómeno migratorio en España, Universidad de Sevilla, pp. 201-218.

 

De Lucas Martín, Javier (2017): “Negar la política, negar sus sujetos y derechos. Las políticas migratorias y de asilo como emblemas de la necropolítica”, Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, 36, pp. 64-87.

 

De Lucas Martín, Javier (2018): “Identidad, ciudadanía y derecho: del estereotipo al fobotipo”, Amnis. Revue d’études des sociétés et cultures contemporaines Europe/Amérique, https://doi.org/10.4000/amnis.3244

 

De Lucas Martín, Javier (2020): Decir no. El imperativo de la desobediencia, Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

 

De Lucas Martín, Javier (2021): Nosotros, que quisimos tanto a Atticus Finch, Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

 

Dunant, Sarah (Ed.) (1994): The war of the Words. The Political Correctness Debate, London: Virago Press.

 

Fairclough, Norman (2003): “‘Political correctness’: The politics of culture and language”, Discourse & Society 14.1, pp. 17-28.

 

Gallardo Paúls, Beatriz (2018): Tiempos de hipérbole. Inestabilidad e interferencias en el discurso político, Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.

 

Gallardo Paúls, Beatriz (2021): “Negation as enunciative position: Spanish radical right’s discourse in the social network context”. En Óscar Barberá (Ed.): Facing the New Far Right in Southern Europe, Brussels: Coppieters Foundation, pp. 160-183.

 

Gallardo Paúls, Beatriz (2022): Signos rotos. Fracturas de lenguaje en la esfera pública, Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.

 

Hall, Stuart (1994): “Some ‘politically incorrect’ pathways through PC”. En Sarah Dunant (ed.): The War of the Words: the Political Correctness Debate, Londres: Virago Press, pp. 164-183.

 

Lind, Willilam S. (Ed.) (2004): Political correctness: a short history of an ideology. Washington: Free Congress Foundation.

 

Losey, Kay M. & Kurthen, Hermann (1995): “The Rhetoric of ‘Political Correctness’ in the US Media”, Amerikastudien 40.2, pp. 227-245.

 

Perry, Ruth (1992): “A Short History of the Term ‘Politically Correct’”, The Women's Review of Books, 9 (5), pp. 15-16.

 

Schopenhauer, Arthur (1864): El arte de tener razón. Expuesto en 38 estratagemas, Madrid: Alianza, 2006. Trad. de Jesús Alborés Rey.

 

Schultz, Debra (1993): To Reclaim a Legacy of Diversity. Analyzing The “Political Correctness” Debates In Higher Education, New York: The National Council for Research on Women.

 

Schwartz, Howard S. (2018): “The Children of Political Correctness”, SSRN electronical journal, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3138253

 

Villar Hernández, Paz (Ed.) (2021): Retóricas negativas. La desinformación de derecha radical y su cobertura mediática, Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

 

Weigel, Moira (2016): “Political correctness: how the right invented a phantom enemy”, The Guardian 30/11/2016.

 

Whitney, D. Charles & Wartella, Ellen (1992): “Media Coverage of the ‘Political Correctness’ Debate”, Journal of Communication 42.2, pp. 83-94.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-22

How to Cite

Gallardo Paúls, B. (2023). From peculiarity’s rhetoric to disinhibition’s rhetoric: a discursive itinerary of populism. Cuadernos Electrónicos De Filosofía Del Derecho, (49), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.49.25248
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    565
  • PDF (Español)
    472

Issue

Section

3. Legitimacy, citizenship and disobedience to law

Metrics