Peer review process

  • The article review process for each volume of the journal is managed by the EFIT Editorial Board.
  • Articles must be original research of scientific quality. They will be submitted to a peer review process (double-blind), by external reviewers proposed by the editors of the volume, according to their area of expertise.
  • The reviewers will issue an evaluation report provided by the Editorial Board.
  • All articles must conform to EFIT's editing guidelines.
  • Once the review process has been completed, the Editorial Board will inform the authors in writing of the final reasoned decision, and will send them the expert opinions in order to make the appropriate changes (if necessary).
  • As stated in the guidelines, negative evaluation of the article by the two reviewers will result in the article not being published in the volume.
  • In the event of a discrepancy between the reviewers, the Editorial Board will send the original to a third reviewer, who may be a member of the Scientific Committee or the Editorial Committee (or any other proposed specialist).

See Online Review Form for: