Resilience as an industrial policy objective: an application to the industrial districts of the valencian region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/IREP.2.2.19349Abstract
In the most recent Since the financial and economic crisis of 2008 and the current health and economic crisis, concept of resilience has been increasingly included in economic analysis and economic policy proposals. Following this trend, the aim of this work is to apply the concept of resilience to the analysis of the evolution of industrial and advanced services sectors in the Valencian Region during the Great Recession. The analysis is based on the classification of local labour markets as industrial districts. Resilience is defined here as the ability of a system to cope with the consequences of an external shock. At the same time, resilience as a new and accurate reference for the industrial policy is also proposed. Therefore, the estimation of resilience could be useful to evaluate the effectiveness of measures designed to improve resistance to adverse shocks.
Industrial districts are analysed here because their relevance for the Valencian Region as areas with a long industrial and manufacturing tradition. In addition, the concept of industrial district is based on its dynamism; so, it allows the study of resilience during the last economic crisis, starting in 2008. Thus, the aim is to analyse the resilience shown by local labour systems of the Valencian Region distinguishing those that are industrial districts. In this context, benefits associated with agglomeration economies and entrepreneurial relationships should improve the resistance of industrial districts to cope with the negative effects of external shocks. Particularly, in terms of production level recovery as employment takes longer to recover. The findings of this study could be useful to point to resilience as a main industrial policy objective. Thus, policy measures could be designed with the aim of increasing resilience of productive sectors in the event of future shocks.
Downloads
References
Asheim, B.T. (2000). Industrial Districts, en G.L. Clark, M.P. Feldman y M.S. Gertler, Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 413-431.
Behrens, K., Boualam, B. y Martin, J. (2016). The resilience of the Canadian textile industries and clusters to shocks, 2001-2013, Project Report 2016RP-05, Cirano-Centre Interuniversitaire de Recerche en Analyse des Organisatiosn, Montreal, disponible en https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2016RP-05.pdf (última visita, 22 de mayo de 2018).
Boix, R. y Galletto, V. (2006). Sistemas locales de trabajo y distritos industriales marshallianos en España, Economía Industrial, 359, 165-184.
Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience, Regional Studies, 49 (5), 733-751, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481.
Boschma, R. y Lambooy, J.G. (2002). Knowledge, market structure, and economic coordination: Dynamics of industrial districts, Growth and Change, 33(3), 291-311.
De Marchi,V. y Grandinetti, R. (2014). Industrial Districts and the collapse of the Marshallian Model: Looking at the Italian experience, Competition and Change, 18(1), 70-87, doi:10.1179/1024529413Z.00000000049.
Delgado, M. y Porter, M.E. (2017). Clusters and the Great Recession, mimeo, http://mitsloan.mit.edu/shared/ods/documents/Fang_L_CV_web_09-19-2014.pdf?DocumentID=4075 (última visita el 27 de febrero de 2018).
Hadjimichalis, C. (2006). The end of Third Italy as we knew it? Antipode, 38(1), 82-106.
Kärrholm, M., Nylund, K. y Prieto de la Fuente, P. (2014). Spatial resilience and urban planning: Addressing the interdependence of urban retail areas, Cities, 36, 121-130.
Knight-Lenihan, S. (2017). Why definitions of resilience matter: The example of funding New Zealand’s transport sector, Urban Policy and Research, 35(3), 333-346, doi: 10.1080/08111146.2017.1295937.
Martin, R. y Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution, Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395-437.
Martin, R. (2012). Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks, Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 1–32.
Martin, R. y Sunley, P. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation, Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), 1-42, doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu015.
Martin, R., Sunley, P., Gardiner, B. y Tyler, P. (2016). How Regions React to Recessions: Resilience and the Role of Economic Structure, Regional Studies, 50(4), 561-585, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410.
Martin, R. y Gardiner, B. (2019). The resilience of cities to economic shocks: A tale of four recessions (and the challenge of Brexit), Papers in Regional Science, 98(4), 1801-1832, doi:10.1111/pirs.12430.
Murua, J.R. y Ferrero, A.M. (2019). Talking about regional resilience: Evidence from two formerly rural Spanish regions, European Planning Studies, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1615037.
Pendall, R.; Foster, K.A. y Cowell, M. (2010). Resilience and regions: building understanding of the metaphor, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 71-84.
Rouet, G. y Pascariu, G. (eds.) (2019). Resilience and the EU's Eastern Neighbourhood Countries. From Theoretical Concepts to a Normative Agenda, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Salom, J. y Albertos, J.M. (2013). Los distritos industriales en la reconfiguración territorial de la Comunidad Valenciana (2008-2012), XXXIX Reunión de Estudios Regionales, Oviedo, 21-22 de noviembre.
Sedita, S. R., De Noni, I. y Pilotti, L. (2017). Out of the crisis: An empirical investigation of place-specific determinants of economic resilience, European Planning Studies, 25(2), 155-180, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1261804.
Schamp, E. W. (2005). Decline of the district, renewal of firms: an evolutionary approach to footwear production in the Pirmasens area, Germany, Environment and Planning A, 37, 617-634.
Suire, R. y Vicente, J. (2014). Cluster for life or life cycles of clusters: In search of the critical factors of clusters’ resilience, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(1-2), 142-164, doi: 10.1080/08985626.2013.877985.
Weterings, A. y Marsili, O. (2015). Spatial Concentration of Industries and New Firm Exits: Does this Relationship Differ between Exits by Closure and by M&A?, Regional Studies, 49(1), 44-58, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.726708.
Ybarra, J.A. (2009). Nuevos distritos industriales: Traspasando algunos límites conceptuales, XXXV Congreso de la Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, Valencia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract502
-
PDF ESPAÑOL (Español)89
Issue
Section
License
Copyright is the right exercised by the creator over his/her literary and artistic work. The owner of the copyright is, as a rule, the person who creates the work, which is to say the author. In Copyright Law, the author is considered to be “the natural person who creates a literary, artistic or scientific piece of work”. Although in principle it is only natural or physical persons who may be considered to be authors, the law foresaw certain cases in which legal persons could also benefit from these rights.
Authorship is irrevocable; it may not be transmitted either inter vivos or in the form of a testamentary trust; it does not disappear with the passage of time nor is it public domain; it is not subject to the statute of limitations.
Copyright Law has a dual nature; it covers moral rights (paternity, integrity, dissemination…), and property rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation):
Moral rights (article 14 of the Spanish Copyright Law). These refer to acknowledgement of authorship. They are irrevocable and inalienable and correspond to the right to:
- Decide whether his/her work is to be disseminated and how.
- Acknowledge authorship of the work.
- Demand respect for the integrity of the work.
- Modify the work while being respectful of the rights acquired.
- Withdraw the work from sale, without prejudice to compensation for damages to the owners of the right of use.
- Access the single,unique copy of the work that is held by a third party
Property rights (articles 18 to 25 of the Spanish Copyright Law). They refer to the four types of right of use. They allow the owner of the work to obtain financial compensation for the third-party use of his/her work:
- Reproduction: obtaining of copies of all or part of the work.
- Distribution: the public availability of the work through its sale, rental, loan or by any other means.
- Public Communication: action through which a group of people may have access to the work.
- Transformation: the translation, adaptation and any other modification of the work, leading, or not, to new work derived from it.