Propiedades psicométricas y estudio de establecimiento de normas del Test de Interpretación Pianística para futuros docentes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/LEEME.0.27217Palabras clave:
Music-education, piano performance, pre-service teachers, inter-rater reliability, rubric, standard-setting.Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio era investigar las propiedades psicométricas del test de Interpretación de Piano para Profesores de Enseñanza Primaria y realizar un estudio de fijación de estándares para esta escala. Este estudio incluyó tres grupos de participantes: estudiantes (n=100), calificadores (n=2) utilizados para comprobar las características psicométricas de la prueba de rendimiento en instrumentos musicales y expertos (n=6) para el estudio de fijación de estándares de la prueba. En este estudio, los investigadores desarrollaron una prueba de interpretación musical y una rúbrica analítica. Los resultados mostraron que la estructura de un factor era adecuada para la prueba de ejecución de instrumentos musicales, que explicaba el 66% de la varianza total. El coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach mostró que la consistencia interna de la escala era aceptable (.83). Además, los estudios de generalizabilidad y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase indicaron una excelente fiabilidad de la escala por parte de los evaluadores. Los resultados del análisis de discriminación de ítems muestran que la prueba de interpretación de instrumentos musicales es capaz de discriminar entre participantes con niveles altos y bajos de habilidad para tocar el piano.
Citas
Abeles, H.F. (1973). Development and validation of a clarinet performance adjudication rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345094
Alessandri, E., Williamson, V.J., Eiholzer, H. y Williamon, A. (2016). A critical ear: analysis of value judgments in reviews of Beethoven’s piano sonata recordings. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 391. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00391
Andrade, H.G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5),13-18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285750862_Using_rubrics_to_promote_thinking_and_learning
Barret, P. y Kline, P. (1981). The observation to variable ratio in factor analyses. Journal of Personality and Group Behavior, 2, 94-98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232561774_The_Observation_to_Variable_Ratio_in_Factor_Analysis
Bejar, I.I. (2008). Standard setting: What is it? Why is it important? (R&D Connections No. 7.). https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RD_Connections7.pdf
Ben-David, M.F. (2000). AMEE guide no.18: Standard setting in student assessment. Medical Teacher, 22(2), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590078526
Bergee, M.J. (2003). Faculty interjudge reliability of music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(2), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345847
Bergee, M.J. (2007). Performer, rater, occasion, and sequence as sources of variability in music performance assessment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(4), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408317515
Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing Learning Through Self-Assessment. Routledge.
Boyle D.J. y Radocy, R.E. (1987). Measurement: Evaluation of musical experiences. Schirmer Books.
Brennan, R.L. (2001). Statistics for social science and public policy generalizability theory. Springer.
Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications, Inc.
Cizek, G.J. y Bunch, M.B. (2007). Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Sage Publications.
Crocker, L. y Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Cengage Learning.
Diederich, P.B. (1973). Short-cut statistics for teacher-made tests. Educational Testing Service.
Duerksen, G.L. (1972). Some effects of expectation on evaluation of recorded musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education., 20, 268-272. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344093
Elliott, D. y Silverman, M. (2015). Music matters: A Philosophy of music education. Oxford University Press.
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E. y Hyun, H.H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education (9th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
Guven, E.D. (2020). Piano-accompanied solfège reading experiences of preservice music teachers. Research Studies in Music Education, 43(3), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x19871078
Gliner, J.A., Morgan, G.A. y Leech, N.L. (2009). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. Routledge.
Haladyna, T.M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher order thinking. Allyn and Bacon.
Hooper, D., Coughan, J. y Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. http://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/6596/
Howell, D.C. (2013). Statistical methods for psychology. Cengage Learning.
Juslin, P.N. (2003). Five facets of musical expression: a psychologist’s perspective on music performance. Psychology of Music, 31, 273-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356030313003
Kamış, Ö. y Doğan, C.D. (2018). An investigation of reliability coefficients estimated for decision studies in generalizability theory. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(4), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n4p103
Kim, S., Park, J.M., Rhyu, S., Nam, J. y Lee, K. (2021). Quantitative analysis of piano performance proficiency focusing on difference between hands. PLoS ONE, 16(5), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250299
Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C.D. y Karakaya (2014). Ölçme ve değerlendirme: Performansa ve portfolyoya dayalı durum belirleme [Measurement and evaluation: An assessment based on performance and portfolio]. Pegem Academy.
Lee, Y. (2009). Music practices and teachers’ needs for teaching music in public preschools of south korea. International Journal of Music Education, 27(4), 356-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761409344663
Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C. y George, A.M. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Mak, H.W. y Fancourt, D. (2019). Arts engagement and self‐esteem in children: Results from a propensity score matching analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1449(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14056
McMillan, J.H. y Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40-49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42923742
Moskal, M.B. (2000). Scoring rubric: what, when and how? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.7275/a5vq-7q66
Nichols, J.P. (1991). A factor analysis approach to the development of a rating scale for snare drum performance. Dialogue Instrumental Music Education, 15, 11-31. Michigan University Press.
Palmer, C. (1996). On the assignment of structure in music performance. Music Perception, 14, 23-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285708
Price, H.E. y Burnsed, V. (1989). Classroom teachers’ assessments of elementary education music methods. Update: Applications of Research in Music-education, 8(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512338900800107
Robinson, N.R. (2016). Developing a critical consciousness for diversity and equity among preservice music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(3), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083716643349
Russell, B.E. (2010). The Empirical Testing of a Musical Performance Assessment Paradigm. PhD. University of Miami.
Schellenberg, E.G. (2018). Music and cognitive abilities. En S. Hallam, I. Cross y M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (2nd ed.) (pp.261-275). Oxford University Press.
Scripp, L. y Kaufman, B. (2019). Music Learning as Youth Development. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436956-11
Shavelson, R.J. y Webb, N.M. (1991). Generalizability theory a primer. Sage Publications.
Southgate, L., Hays, R.B., Norcini, J., Mulholland, H., Ayers, B., Woolliscroft, H., Cusimano, M., McAvoy, P., Ainsworth, M., Haist, S. y Campbell, M. (2001). Setting performance standards for medical practice: A theoretical framework. Medical Education, 35(5), 474-481. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00897.x
Standley, J.M. (2016). Music and early childhood development. En A.C. Lehmann, J.A. Sloboda y R. Woody (Eds.), Psychology for musicians: Understanding and acquiring the skills (pp.103-118). Oxford University Press.
Stanley, M., Brooker, R. y Gilbert, R. (2002). Examiner perceptions of using criteria in music performance assessment. Research Studies in Music Education, 18(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x020180010601
Stevens, D.D. y Levi, A. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Styus.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar [Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281981476_Yapidotlesssal_esitlik_modelleri_Temel_kavramlar_ve_ornek_uygulamalar
Swanwick, K. (2016). Music education and human development. En R. Colwell y C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp.3-23). Oxford University Press.
Tabachnick, B.G. y Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Thompson, S. y Williamon, A. (2003). Evaluating evaluation: Musical performance assessment as a research tool. Music Perception, 21(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2003.21.1.21
Thompson, W.F., Diamond, C.T.P. y Balkwill, L.L. (1998). The adjudication of six performances of a Chopin etude: A study of expert knowledge. Psychology of Music, 26(2), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735698262004
Urbina, S. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. John Wiley & Sons.
Wapnick, J., Ryan, C., Lacaille, N. y Darrow, A.-A. (2004). Effects of selected variables on musicians’ ratings of high-level piano performances. International Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761404042371
Wapnick, J., Ryan, C., Campbell, L., Deek, R., Lemire, R. y Darrow, A.A. (2005). Effects of excerpt tempo and duration on musicians' ratings of high-level piano performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940505300206
Watkins, J.G. y Farnum, S.E. (1954). The Watkins-Farnum performance scale, form A; A standardized achievement test for all band instruments. Hall Leonard Music Press.
Wesolowski, B.C. (2012). Understanding and developing rubrics for music performance assessment. Music Educators Journal, 98(3), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432111432524
Wesolowski, B.C., Wind, S.A. y Engelhard, G. (2016). Examining rater precision in music performance assessment: An analysis of rating scale structure using the Multifaceted Rasch Partial Credit Model. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(5), 662-678. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2016.33.5.662
Wesolowski, B.C., Wind, S.A. y Engelhard, G. (2015). Rater fairness in music performance assessment: Evaluating model-data fit and differential rater functioning. Musicae Scientiae, 19(2), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864915589014
Wrigley, W.J. y Emmerson, S.B. (2011). Ecological development and validation of a music performance rating scale for five instrument families. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611418552
Zdzinski, S.F. y Barnes, G.V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 245-255. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345801
Descargas
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
a) Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
b) Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
c) Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
d) Se comprometen a actuar como revisores, en caso que así se lo solicite el Equipo Editorial de la revista.