Where will the digital humanities be in 100 years?

The humanities as a hope for the digital

Authors

  • José Calvo Tello image/svg+xml Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.15.27672

Keywords:

digital humanities, preservation, FAIR principles, repositories, data

Abstract

The acceleration of technological development raises certain challenges and doubts about the maintenance of tools and data. Must we accept that digital data will be useless in a few decades? This article presents some concrete solutions, such as the use of repositories, the application of FAIR principles, or the use of standard formats such as XML-TEI. More generally, it argues for the maintenance of a historical view both of the humanities and of libraries, and for a humanistic and quantitative critique of digital aspects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Calvo Tello, Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen

Librarian specialised in research and development at the State and University Library Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Germany). He received his doctorate from the University of Würzburg in 2020 with a thesis entitled The novel in the Spanish Silver Age: A digital analysis of genre using machine learning (transcript, 2021). His interests focus on the development and application of quantitative methods to Romance literature and library collections and the preservation of data from literature studies.

References

Allés-Torrent, S., & del Rio Riande, G. (2019). The switchover: Teaching and learning the text encoding initiative in Spanish. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, 12. https://doi.org/10.4000/jtei.2994

Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826

Burnard, L., Schöch, C., & Odebrecht, C. (2021). In search of comity: TEI for distant reading. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, 14. https://doi.org/10.4000/jtei.3500

Calvo Tello, J., Rißler-Pipka, N., & Barth, F. (2023). GND und Normdaten für europäische Literatur? Personen und Werke in donen multilingualen Korpora von ELTeC. In A. Busch & P. Trilcke (Eds.), Open Humanities, Open Culture, 2023. Konferenzabstracts (p. 160–165). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7688631

Del Rio Riande, G., & Allés-Torrent, S. (2023). ¿Quién conforma la comunidad de la TEI en español? Análisis de los datos de una encuesta. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, 16. https://doi.org/10.4000/jtei.4927

Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv, 1810.04805 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805

Garrish, M. (2011). What is EPUB 3? O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920022442.do

Gengnagel, T., Neuber, F., & Schulz, D. (2023). FAIR enough? Evaluating digital scholarly editions and the application of the FAIR data principles. RIDE, 16. https://doi.org/10.18716/RIDE.A.16.0

González-Blanco, E., Cantón, C. M., del Rio Riande, G., Ros, S., Pastor, R., Robles-Gómez, A., Caminero, A., Díez Platas, M. L., del Olmo, Á., & Urízar, M. (2017). EVI-LINHD, a virtual research environment for the Spanish-speaking community. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(suppl_2), ii171–ii178. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx025

Mandal, S. (2023, 2 February). Amazon’s send to Kindle feature still supports sending MOBI file. Good E-Reader. https://goodereader.com/blog/kindle/amazons-send-to-kindle-feature-still-supports-sending-mobi-file

McIlroy, T. (2012). Ebook formats are a mess – here’s why. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 247–250.

O’Shea, K., & Nash, R. (2015). An introduction to convolutional neural networks. arXiv, 1511.08458. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.08458

Rockwell, G., & Sinclair, S. (2016). Hermeneutica: Computer-assisted interpretation in the humanities. The MIT Press.

Sahle, P. (2015). Digital humanities? Gibt’s doch gar nicht! ZfdG. https://doi.org/10.17175/sb001_004

Schöch, C., Erjavec, T., Patras, R., & Santos, D. (2021). Creating the European Literary Text Collection (ELTeC): Challenges and perspectives. Modern Languages Open, 1. https://doi.org/10.3828/mlo.v0i0.364

Sinclair, S., & Rockwell, G. (2016). Voyant Tools [Software]. http://voyant-tools.org/

Underwood, T. (2014). Understanding genre in a collection of a million volumes, Interim Report. https://figshare.com/articles/Understanding_Genre_in_a_Collection_of_a_Million_Volumes_Interim_Report/1281251

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Calvo Tello, J. (2024). Where will the digital humanities be in 100 years? The humanities as a hope for the digital. Metode Science Studies Journal, (15). https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.15.27672
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    126

Issue

Section

Digital humanities

Metrics

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.