Measuring Urgency: Risk Quantification and Identification of Priorities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/eutopias.0.18642Keywords:
Quantification of the environment, Big Data, planetary limits, sustainability and urgency
Abstract
In this text we will address the process of quantification of the environment at work since the 1960’s, to see to what extent it allows us to interpret information in terms of sustainability and urgency. The explosion of means to collect data (known as Big Data) seems to open infinite horizons for the analyses of all kinds of socio-economic and environmental phenomena. Simultaneously, current environmental changes put the contested notion of limits back on scientific and political agendas. Some perceive the new available data as the possibility to better identify environmental or developmental limits. A contrario, the notion of limits, in particular that of «planetary boundaries», seems to stem from a double restriction: quantitative (the end of unlimited growth) and conceptual (simplification of complex realities). We will see, however, that limits also open the possibility of translating multiple data on the environment into regulatory information on fundamental equilibriums to be preserved and on priorities for action. Maybe the outmost urgency is to produce this regulatory information, which government, businesses, and individuals absolutely need to have access to in order to act more efficiently and with more pertinence in a complex and changing world.
Downloads
References
Blomqvist, Linus et al. (2013), « Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints », PLOS Biol, 11(11), e1001700. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.1001700>
Carpenter, Stephen R. & Bennett, Elena M. (2011), «Reconsideration of the planetary boundary for phosphorus », Environmental Research Letters, 6 (1), 014009.http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014009>
Carson, R. (1963), Le Printemps Silencieux, Trad. J. F. Gravrand, Paris : Plon.
Costanza, R., et al. (1997), « The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital », Nature, pp. 387, 253-260.
Crutzen, P.J. (2002), « Geology of Mankind », Nature, 415 (6867), pp. 23–23. http://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
Rapport, D. & Friend, A. (1979), « Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Statistics: a Stress–response Approach », Statistics Canada Catalogue 11-510, Ottawa : Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
Dao, Hy et al. (2015), « Environmental Limits and Swiss Footprints Based on Planetary Boundaries », Genève : UNEP/GRID-Geneva et Université de Genève. <http://pb.grid.unep.ch>
EEA (2014), « Digest of EEA indicators 2014 », EEA Technical Report, No 8/2014.
Ehrlich, Paul R. & Holdren, John P. (1971), « Impact of Population Growth », Science, 171(3977), pp. 1212–1217. <http://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212>
Eurostat (2014), « Getting Messages across Using Indicators. A Handbook based on Experiences from Assessing Sustainable Development Indicators », Eurostat Manuals and Guidelines, Luxembourg : Eurostat.
Fiala, Nathan (2008), « Measuring Sustainability: Why the Ecological Footprint is Bad Economics and Bad Environmental Science », Ecological Economics, 67(4), pp. 519–525. <http://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2008.07.023>
Friot, Damien (2009), Environmental Accounting and Globalisation. Which Models to Tackle New Challenges? Applying Economics-Environment-Impacts Models to Evaluate Environmental Impacts Induced by Europe in China, and EU Carbon Tarifs, Paris : Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris. <https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00527496>
Frischknecht, Rolf, et al. (2014), « Development of Switzerland’s Worldwide Environmental Impact », Berne : Office Fédéral de l’Environnement. <http://www.bafu.admin.ch/publikationen/publikation/01771/index.html?lang=en>
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas (1971), The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
— (1979), « Energy Analysis and Economic Valuation », Southern Economic Journal, 1023-1058.
Hák, Tomas., Moldan, Bedrich & Dahl, Arther L. (2012), Sustainability Indicators: A Scientific Assessment, Washington : Island Press.
Hoekstra, Arjen Y. & Wiedmann, Thomas O. (2014), « Humanity’s Unsustainable Environmental Footprint », Science, 344 (6188), pp. 1114–1117. <http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248365>
Hüssy, Charles (2016), « La territorialité, éléments pour une approche écogénétique », Société de Géographie de Genève. <http://www.sgeo-ge.ch>
IPCC (2013), « Summary for Policymakers », Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 28). Cambridge (UK) et New York (USA) : IPCC. <http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5>
Jol, Andre, et al. (1997), Air Pollution in Europe 1997, Copenhagen : EEA.
Jungbluth, Niels, Stucki, Matthias & Leuenberger, Marianne (2011), Environmental Impacts of Swiss Consumption and Production. A Combination of Input-outpout Analysis with Life Cycle Assessment, Berne : Office Fédéral de l’Environnement.
Meadows, Donella H., et al. (1972), The Limits to Growth, New York : Universe.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), « Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis. A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment », Washington DC : Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Nykvist, B., et al. (2013), « National Environmental Performance on Planetary Boundaries. A study for the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency», Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, nr. 6576. <http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Om-Naturvardsverket/Publikationer/ISBN/6500/978-91-620-6576-8>
OECD (Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development) (1994), « Environmental Indicators », OECD core sets, Paris : OECD.
Pearce, David & Moran, Dominic (1994), The Economic Value of Biodiversity, London: Routledge.
Raffestin, Claude (1980), « Plaidoyer pour une écologie humaine », Archives suisses d’anthropologie générale, 44 (2), pp. 123–129.
Rees, William E. (1992), « Ecological Footprints and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: What Urban Economics Leaves Out », Environment and Urbanization, 4 (2), pp. 121– 130. <http://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400212>
Rockström, Johan et al. (2009), « A Safe Operating Space for Humanity », Nature, 461(7263), pp. 472–475. <http://doi.org/10.1038/461472a>
Steffen, Will, et al. (2015), « Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet », Science, 347 (6223), 1259855. <http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855>
UN/IEAG (2014), « A World that Counts. Mobilising the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development.United Nations », <http://www.undatarevolution.org>
Wackernagel, Mathis (1994), « Ecological Footprintand Appropriated Carrying Capacity: A Tool For Planning Toward Sustainability », Vancouver : Doctoral dissertation of the University of British Columbia. <http://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/7132>
Westman, Walter E. (1977), « How Much Are Nature’s Services Worth? », Science, 197 (4307), pp. 960–964. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.197.4307.960
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract158
-
PDF (Français )50
Issue
Section
License
The authors conserve the copyright. All content published in EU-topías. Journal of interculturality, Communication, and European Studies are subject to the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license. The full text of the license can be found at <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0>
They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that:
- The authorship and original source of the publication is cited (journal, publisher and URL of the work).
- They are not used for commercial purposes.
- The existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions for images that are subject to copyright.
Similar Articles
Make a Submission
Language
Information
Keywords
