Vulnerability, moral concepts, and ethics in interpreting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/Just.3.27746Paraules clau:
vulnerabilitat, deure moral de cura, jo moral, dany moral, interpretació per a poblacions vulnerables, ètica de la interpretació
Resum
S'han dedicat molts estudis a investigar la tipologia de funcions que exerceixen les i els intèrprets en representar i defendre poblacions vulnerables, però la vulnerabilitat de qui interpreta en aquest tipus d'entorns, com també la gènesi d’aquesta vulnerabilitat, són qüestions que s’han atès rarament. En aquest estudi, s'entén la interpretació per a poblacions vulnerables com un context comunicatiu específic en què s'entremesclen polítiques institucionals, d'informació i de poder, la qual cosa suscita judicis morals sobre el deure de cura en els quals es barregen emocions, subtileses i subjectivitats. Partint de teories procedents dels estudis sobre vulnerabilitat i de conceptes relatius a la moral, l'autora aplica un mètode fenomenològic interpretatiu a l'estudi de tres intèrprets de serveis públics, en el qual analitza els factors clau que influeixen en la vulnerabilitat contextual, els efectes adversos de l'angoixa moral que aquesta els provoca i la manera d'observar des d'una altra òptica el codi ètic de la interpretació per a poblacions vulnerables. Aquest és el primer treball de recerca que teoritza sobre la vulnerabilitat de les i els intèrprets de serveis públics en funció del context, així com sobre la manera com la interdependència entre els diferents aspectes de la vulnerabilitat i els conceptes morals influeixen en les decisions de les persones que interpreten.
Descàrregues
Biografia de l'autora o autor
Xiaohui Yuan, University of Birmingham
Referències
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. “What is the point of equality?” Ethics 109 (2): 287–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2010. "Justifying the capabilities approach to justice." In Measuring justice: Primary goods and capabilities, edited by Harry Brighouse & Ingrid Robeyns, 81–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810916.004.
Bahadır, Şebnem. 2017. "The interpreter as observer, participant and agent of change: The irresistible entanglement between interpreting ethics, politics and pedagogy." In The changing role of the interpreter: Contextualizing norms, ethics and quality standards, edited by Marta Biagini, Michael Boyd & Claudia Monacelli, 122–145. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621531-7.
Boéri, Julie. 2023. “Steering ethics towards social justice in interpreting. A model for a meta ethics of interpreting.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 18 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.20070.boe.
Burke, Peter & Janet Stets. 2009. Identity theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388275.001.0001.
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of war: When is life grievable? London: Verso.
Dean, Robyn K. & Robert Q. Pollard. 2011. “Context-based ethical reasoning in interpreting: A demand control schema.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (1): 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10798816.
Dodds, Susan. 2013. "Dependence, care, and vulnerability." In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, edited by Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds, 181–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.003.0008.
Fineman, Martha. 2008. “The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20 (1): 1–23.
Fineman, Martha. 2010. “The vulnerable subject and the responsive state.” Emory Law Journal 60 (2): 251–275.
Goodin, Robert E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Graham, Gordon. 2011. Theories of ethics: An introduction to moral philosophy with a selection of classic readings. London: Routledge.
Hamric, Ann. 2012. “Empirical research on moral distress: Issues, challenges, and opportunities.” HEC Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 24 (1): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-012-9177-x.
Hardy, Sam A. & Gustavo Carlo. 2011. “Moral identity: What is it, how does it develop, and is it linked to moral action?” Child Development Perspectives 5 (3): 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00189.x.
Jameton, Andrew. 1984. Nursing practice: The ethical issues. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Jameton, Andrew. 1993. “Dilemmas of moral distress: Moral responsibility and nursing practice.” AWHONNS Clinical Issues Perinatal and Women’s Health Nursing 4 (4): 542–551.
Kherbache, Alexandra, Evelyne Mertens & Yvonne Denier. 2022. “Moral distress in medicine: An ethical analysis.” Journal of Health Psychology 27 (8): 1971–1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211014586.
Llewellyn-Jones, Peter & Robert G. Lee. 2014. Redefining the role of the community interpreter: The concept of role-space. Lincoln, UK: SLI Press.
Mackenzie, Catriona. 2013. "The importance of relational autonomy and capabilities for an ethics of vulnerability." In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, edited by Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds, 33–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.003.0002.
Mackenzie, Catriona, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds, eds. 2013. Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.001.0001.
Mason, Ian. 2009. "Role, positioning and discourse in face-to-face interpreting." In Interpreting and translating in public service settings. Policy, practice, pedagogy, edited by Raquel de Pedro Ricoy, Isabelle A. Perez & Christine W.L. Wilson, 52–73. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Miller, Sarah C. 2012. The ethics of need: Agency, dignity and obligation. New York: Routledge.
National Register of Public Service Interpreters (NRPSI). 2016. Code of professional conduct. https://www.nrpsi.org.uk/for-clients-of-interpreters/code-of-professional-conduct.html#:~:text=The%20Code%20prescribes%20standards%20of,to%20the%20public%20at%20large.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw.
Popper, Karl. 1994. The open society and its enemies: New one-volume edition. NED-New ed. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Reader, Soran, ed. 2005. The philosophy of need. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, Wendy, Catriona Mackenzie & Susan Dodds. 2012. “Why Bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability.” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2): 11–38. https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.5.2.11.
Rudvin, Mette. 2020. "Situating interpreting ethics in moral philosophy." In Ethics in public service interpreting, edited by Mary Phelan, Mette Rudvin, Hanne Skaaden & Patrick Kermit, 24–84. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715056-2.
Scully, Jackie L. 2013. "Disability and vulnerability: On bodies, dependence, and power." In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, edited by Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds, 204–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.003.0009.
Sellman, Derek. 2005. “Towards an understanding of nursing as a response to human vulnerability.” Nursing Philosophy 6 (1): 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2004.00202.x.
Sen, Amartya & Bernard Williams, eds. 1982. Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611964.
Skaaden, Hanne. 2019. “Invisible or invincible? Professional integrity, ethics, and voice in public service interpreting.” Perspectives 27 (5): 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676x.2018.1536725.
Smith, Jonathan, Paul Flowers & Michael Larkin. 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
Smith, Jonathan & Isabella Nizza. 2021. Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000259-000.
Stryker, Sheldon. 2002. Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
Tiselius, Elizabet, Elizabet Hägglund & Pernilla Pergert. 2020. "Distressful situations, non-supportive work climate, threats to professional and private integrity: Healthcare interpreting in Sweden." In Handbook of research in medical interpreting, edited by Izabel E.T. de V. Souza & Effrossyni Fragkou, 54–79. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9308-9.ch003.
Wiggins, David. 2005. “An idea we cannot do without: What difference will it make (e.g., to moral, political and environmental philosophy) to recognize and put to use a substantial conception of need?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 57: 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246105057024.
Yuan, Xiaohui. 2022a. “A symbolic interactionist approach to interpreter’s identity management.” Interpreting and Society 2 (2): 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523810221100990.
Yuan, Xiaohui. 2022b. “A symbolic interactionist model of interpreter-facilitated communication—Key communication issues in face-to-face interpreting.” Frontiers in Communication 7: 8–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1000849.
Yuan, Xiaohui. 2024, forthcoming. Public service interpreter’s identity management and identity crisis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Descàrregues
Publicades
Com citar
-
Resum191
-
PDF 91
Número
Secció
Llicència
Les autores i autors atorguen a la revista el dret de primera publicació amb el treball protegit amb una llicència Reconeixement-SenseObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional que permet a terceres parts copiar i redistribuir l’obra en qualsevol mitjà i format per a qualsevol finalitat, fins i tot comercial, sempre que no es transforme el material, i assegurant que se n'acredita l’autoria i la publicació inicial en aquesta revista.
Les autores i els autors conserven els drets d’autoria, se’ls permet publicar el seu treball en línia i se’ls encoratja a fer-ho (per exemple, en repositoris institucionals o al seu lloc web) una vegada publicat, ja que pot donar lloc a intercanvis productius (vegeu The Effect of Open Access). S'aconsella adoptar una perspectiva de gènere en la difusió dels treballs.
Articles similars
Llengua
Informació
Paraules clau
Trameteu un article
