Contributions for a Marxist perspective on the uses of technology under capitalism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.28.21421

Keywords:

marxism, STS relations, technology, education, world of work

Abstract

Work is central to Marxist analysis, where it is considered indispensable for social reproduction. In the contemporary world, discussions on so-called digital capitalism and the dramatic changes that have taken place in the working environment have brought new challenges for researchers, especially after the economic divisions created by the new worldwide pandemic. Digitization of the working environment and technological progress have been accompanied by precariousness in workers’ living conditions. On the one hand, workers are being driven towards informality while, on the other, the mechanisms for managing and controlling work processes are losing their recognized forms. In this article we discuss the impact of techno-scientific advancement on the lives of workers in view of the contradiction between capital and in the digital world. Our aim is to offer several reflections on the importance of the formal teaching-learning process, especially in higher education institutions, in order to meet the challenges presented by digital capitalism. We assume the adoption of a Marxist perspective in debates on science, technology and society to be an important milestone in the struggle to produce scientific knowledge that is committed to achieving collective well-being and real improvements in workers’ lives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abilio, L. (2018). Uberización: nuevas formas de control, organización y gestión del trabajo. En O. Cortés y A. Constanza (Eds.), Trabajo y subjetividad. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Libre.


Antunes, R. (2018). Parte I - Entre a corrosão e os escombros: o advento do proletariado da era digital. En R. Antunes (Ed.), O privilégio da servidão: o novo proletariado de serviços na era digital. São Paulo: Boitempo.


Antunes, R. (2020). Uberização, trabalho digital e indústria 4.0. São Paulo: Boitempo. Antunes, R. (2021). O capitalismo de plataforma e a desantropomorfização do trabalho. En R. Grohmann y R. (Eds.), Os laboratórios do trabalho digital: entrevistas (pp. 33–38). São Paulo: Boitempo.


Antunes, R., y Braga, R. (2009). Infoproletários: degradação real do trabalho virtual. São Paulo: Boitempo.


Chesnais, F. (2016). Finance capital today: corporations and banks in the lasting global slump. Boston: Brill Academic.


Dardot, P., y Laval, C. (2013). La nueva razón del mundo. Ensayo sobre la sociedad neoliberal. Barcelona: Gedisa.


Espinoza, M. (2018). State terrorism: orientalism and the drone programme. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 11(2), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1456725


Junior, P. L., Deconto, D. C. S., Neto, R. A., Cavalcanti, C. J. H., y Ostermann, F. (2014). Marx como referencial para análise de relações entre Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade. Ciência & Educação, 20(1), 175–194.


Lemos, F. C. S., Galindo, D., Natale, A., Silva, D. G., y Santos, I. C. (2014). A guerra atual e o uso de drones: práticas biopolíticas do matar em nome da vida. Revista Psicologia Política, 14(30), 283–295.


Linsingen, I. V. (2007). Perspectiva educacional CTS: aspectos de um campo em consolidação na América Latina. Ciência & Ensino, 1, 1–19. Descargado de https://wiki.sj.ifsc.edu.br/ images/2/23/Irlan.pdf
 

Lukács, G. (1985). El joven Hegel y los problemas de la sociedad capitalista. Barcelona: Grijalbo.


Lukács, G. (2004). Ontología del ser social: el trabajo. Buenos Aires: Herramienta.

 

Marx, K. (1972). Elementos fundamentales para la crítica de la economía política. México: Siglo XXI.


Marx, K. (1973). El Capital. Crítica de la economía política (Vol. I). México: FCE.



Marx, K., y Engels, F. (2014). La ideología alemana. Madrid: Akal.


Mészáros, I. (2009). A Crise Estrutural do Capital. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.


Mora, H. (1996). Modernización capitalista y trabajo abstracto: ¿sociedad pos capitalista o subsunción real del trabajo general?  Revista Economía y Sociedad, 1(2). Descargado de https://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/economia/article/view/6852

Papadimitropoulos, E. (2021). Platform Capitalism, Platform Cooperativism, and the Commons. Rethinking Marxism, 33(2), 246–262.


Schmidt, A. (1977). El concepto de naturaleza en Marx. Madrid: Siglo XXI.


Slee, T. (2019). Uberização: a nova onda do trabalho precarizado. São Paulo: Editora Elefante.

Stefano, V. D. (2016). The rise of the ”just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork and L. Kostek Abilio [ 11 ] labour protection in the ”gig-economy”. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 71.


Wilcox, L. (2016). Embodying algorithmic war: Gender, race, and the posthuman in drone warfare. Security Dialogue, 48(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616657947


Wittmann, D. (2009). Las fuentes del concepto de alienación. En E. Renault (Ed.), Los Manuscritos de 1844 de Marx (pp. 103–124). Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Published

2022-01-15

How to Cite

de Paiva, I. L., & Miranda, G. (2022). Contributions for a Marxist perspective on the uses of technology under capitalism. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, (28), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.28.21421
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1180
  • PDF (Español)
    958
  • EPUB (Español)
    469
  • HTML (Español)
    760

Issue

Section

THEMATIC ISSUES

Metrics

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.