Desafíos del sindicalismo italiano ante el trabajo sindical con trabajadores "contingentes" en Amazon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7203/acs.43.29087Keywords:
sindicalismo, condiciones de trabajo, amazon, algoritmo, robotización, trabajadores “contingentes”
Abstract
El presente artículo analiza las condiciones de trabajo en Amazon Italia. En este análisis se comparan dos instalaciones de esta empresa en Italia. Por una parte, los almacenes de castel san Geovani, con una estructura organizativa más tradicional y los almacenes de Passo Corese, con un mayor nivel de robotización. El objetivo es doble, por un lado, se describen y se comparan los procesos de organización del trabajo de ambas instalaciones, por otro lado, se estudian las respuestas de los sindicatos a las reivindicaciones de los trabajadores, con especial atención no sólo a los trabajadores permanentes sino sobre todo a los tres grupos de trabajadores que definimos “contingentes”. En el apartado de conclusiones se proponen algunas reflexiones sobre las estrategias sindicales de cara a los trabajadores en Amazon Italia y los resultados obtenidos por estas.
Downloads
References
AMBRA M, C. (2013): “Modelli di rappresentanza sindacale nella società post-industriale. Come i sindacati si stanno ri-organizzando per rappresentare i lavoratori non standard”, Quaderni Rassegna Sindacale – Lavori 4: 75- 94,
AMBRA M, C. (2015): “Come cambiano i modelli di rappresentanza verso i lavoratori atipici e i giovani”, in Quaderni Rassegna Sindacale – Lavori, 4:165-182.
AMBRA M, C. E D’ONOFRIO, M. (2020): “Il sindacalismo italiano alla prova di Amazon. Tra vecchie strategie e rinnovamento organizzativo”, Sociologia del Lavoro, 158:225-242.
AMBRA M, C., D’ONOFRIO, M, RESTANEO, C. (2019): “Alla riscoperta dell’interazione uomo-macchina. Gli effetti dell’introduzione della robotica negli stabilimenti logistici di Amazon”, Conferenze paper, XII Conferenza Espanet Italia, 19-21 settembre 2019, a Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo.
AMBRA M, C, PULIGNANO, V. (2018): “Esternalizzazioni di impresa e strategie sindacali nella logistica: due casi a confronto”, Sociologia del lavoro, 151:136-155.
BALLARINO, G. (2005): “Strumenti nuovi per un lavoro vecchio. Il sindacato italiano e la rappresentanza dei lavoratori atipici”, Sociologia del Lavoro, 17:174-190.
BENASSI, C., DORIGATTI, L. (2015): “Straight to the Core. Explaining Union Responses to the Casualization of Work: The IG Metall Campaign for Agency Workers”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(3): 533-555.
BENASSI C., KORNELAKIS A., (2021): “How Do Employers Choose Between Types of Contingent Work? Costs, Control, and Institutional Toying”, ILR Review, 74(3): 715–738.
BOEWE, J., SCHULTEN, J. (2019): “The Long Struggle of the Amazon Employees. Laboratory of Resistance: Union Organising in E-Commerce Worldwide”, Rosa Luxembourg Foundation: https://www.rosalux.eu/en/article/1558.2ndedition-the-long-struggle-of-the-amazonemployees.html.
BURRONI L., PEDACI M. (2014): “Collective bargaining, atypical employment and welfare provisions: The case of temporary agency work in Italy”, Stato e mercato, 2:169-194.
CARRÉ, F., JOSHI, P. (2000): “Looking for leverage in a fluid world: innovative responses to temporary and contract work”, in F. Carre´, M.A. Ferber, L. Golden, S.A. Herzenberg (eds). Nonstandard Work: The Nature and Challenge of Changing Employment Arrangements. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 313-339.
CASADEI, C. (22 marzo 2021): “Amazon, 40mila in presidio in tutta Italia. Ecco le ragioni dello sciopero”, IlSole24Ore: https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/la-filiera-40mila-amazon-presidio-tutta-italia-societa-risponde-dipendenti-nostra-priorita-ADPbQ7RB, ultimo accesso 14/04/2021.
DE FRANCESCHI, F., PULIGNANO, V., ORTIZ L. (2014): “Il lavoro precario e le strutture sindacali. Le strategie adottate dai sindacati italiani e spagnoli”, Quaderni di Rassegna Sindacale – Lavori, 1:161-195
DORIGATTI, LISA, AND ANNA MORI (2016): “L’impatto delle scelte datoriali sulle condizioni di lavoro e sulle diseguaglianze: disintegrazione verticale, esternalizzazioni e appalti”, Sociologia del Lavoro, 144:190-204.
GRIMSHAW, D., CARTWRIGHT, J., KEIZER, A., RUBERY, J. (2019): “Market exposure and the labour process: The contradictory dynamics in managing subcontracted services work”, Work, Employment & Society, 33(1):76-95.
GUMBRELL-MCCOMBRICK R (2011) European trade unions and ‘atypical’ workers. Industrial Relations Journal 42(3): 293-310.
HEERY, E. (2009): “Trade Unions and Contingent Labour: Scale and Method”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2:429-442.
MALO M, A. (2006): “Temporary Workers and Direct Voting Systems for Workers’ Representation”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 27(3):505-535.
PERNICKA, S. (2005): “The evolution of union politics for atypical employees: a comparison between German and Austrian trade unions in the private sector”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26:201-224
PULIGNANO, V., ORTIZ, L., DE FRANCESCHI, F. (2016): “Union responses to precarious workers: Italy and Spain compared”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 22(1): 39-55.
SIMMS, M. (2015): “Accounting for Greenfield Union Organizing Outcomes”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53:397-422.
SIMMS, M., CHARLWOOD, A. (2010): “Trade unions: power and influence in a changed context”, in T. Colling, T. Michael (a cura di), Industrial relations: theory and practice. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, pp.125-148.
VOSKO L, F. (2000), Temporary Work: The Gendered Rise of a Precarious Employment Relationship. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract33
-
PDF (Español)9
Issue
Section
License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Similar Articles
Make a Submission
Language
Information
Keywords
