Student Appraisal of the Use of Clickers and Video Tutorials in Higher Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.22.14582

Keywords:

ICT, Clickers, mUVies, higher education, degree in International Business, work volume

Abstract

The implementation of undergraduate and postgraduate degrees in Spanish universities has been accompanied by a review of the teaching methodologies used. These methodologies incorporating, in many cases, new Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The ICT of Audience Response Systems (ARS), Clickers, and videos (mUVies) were used in a quantitative subject of a degree offered by the Universitat de València (UV), in an attempt to mitigate the low teaching load of the same and provide students with support material inside and outside the classroom. The work presented examines the students' perception of the use of these ICTs in their learning process and also the volume of work involved in its implementation. Using descriptive and inferential analyses of the opinions obtained in the ICT surveys and the results of the continuous assessment and the final exam, we conclude that the students valued the use of both ICTs very positively with average score higher than 8 (out of 10), rating better the VIDEOS-mUVies than Clickers. As for the volume of work that the implementation of ICTs, this is estimated at about 7.5 hours for students and about 132.5 hours for teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badia Valiente, J.D., Olmo Cazevieille, F. y Navarro Jover, J.M. (2016). On-line quizzes to evaluate comprehension and integration skills. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(2), 75-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.189

Baker, J. W. (2000). The Classroom Flip: Using web course management tools become the guide by the side.Communication Faculty Publications, 15, 9-17. Recuperado de: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/media_and_applied_communications_publications/15

Baker, A. (2016). Active Learning with interactive videos: Creating student-guided learning materials. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 10(3-4), 79-87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2016.1206776

Barac, M. y Pardo-García, C. (2015). Uso de los clickers en asignaturas con características docentes diferentes: motivación y evaluación del alumnado. Trabajo presentado en las IV Jornades IDES, Valencia. Recuperado de: http://www.uv.es/econdocs/ides2015/Llibre_actes_IV_jornades_IDES_2015

Barac, M., López Rodríguez, M.I. (2017). Cuantificando el impacto de los clickers en la docencia universitaria. En ESIC (Ed.), Abstracts del IV Simposio Internacional Innovación Aplicada (ESIC-IMAT). Valencia, España (págs. 59-60). 

Caballer Tarazona, M. y Pardo-García, C. (2014). Statistics continuous assessment through an activity using an interactive voting system. En International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED) (Ed.), Actas de 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, EDULEARN14 Proceedings, Barcelona, España. (pàgs. 2939-2944).

Calvo Roselló, V., López Rodríguez, M.I.y Ruiz Ponce, F. (2017). Uso de un Electronic Voting System: una radiografía del aula universitaria en tiempo real. En Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, Actas de 5th International conference on innovation, documentation and education (INNODOCT), Valencia, España. (págs. 715-726)

Casasús, T., Ivars,A. y López M.I. (2018). Present and future of the e-learning in economics schools and faculties. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 5(1), 44-64.

Derek Bruff, D. (2009). Teaching with classroom response systems: creating active learning environments. Ed. Wiley. 

Dixon, R. y Rawlings, G. (1987). Experiences with continuous assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 12(1), 24-36.

Fuertes, A., García, M., Castaño, M.A., López, E., Zacares, M., Cobos, M., Ferris, R. y Grimaldo, F. (2016). Uso de herramientas de respuesta de audiencia en la docencia presencial universitaria. Un primer contacto.En M. Torres Gil y J.J. Cañadas Martínez (eds.) Actas de las XXII Jenui. Almería, España (págs. 261-268). https://reutilitza.upc.edu/ca/imatges-noticies/actas_jenui2016.pdf

Gallardo Echenique, E. E. (2012).Hablemos de estudiantes digitales y no de nativos digitales. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 1(1), 7-21. 

García Aretio, L. (2017). Los MOOC están muy vivos. Respuestas a algunas preguntas. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(1), 9-27.

Gross, D.; Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Moyano-Camihort, K. y Graham, M. J. (2015). Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(4), 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-02-0040

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J. y Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.

León, J.A., Peñalba, G. y Escudero, I. (2002). Profe, ¿puedo preguntar? Una breve introducción a la interacción de preguntas y respuestas entre profesor y alumno. Psicología Educativa, 8(2), 107-126.

López Rodríguez, M.I y Barac, M. (2016). Uso de los clickers en una asignatura de diseño de experimentos. Trabajo presentado en las V Jornades IDES, Valencia, España..

López Rodríguez, M.I., Palací López, J. y Palací López, D. (2015). Use of ICTs in degree studies: a descriptive analysis. En Actas de 8th International Conference of Education (ICERI), Research and Innovation, Sevilla, España (págs. 2286-2290). https://library.iated.org/publications/ICERI2015

Navarro, J.M. y Olmo, F. (2014). Socrative, una aplicación web 2.0 para evaluar la comprensión de los estudiantes. En Botti, V., Fernández, M.A., Simó y J. Fargueta, F. (eds.), Jornadas de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red de la Universitat Politécnica de València (pp. 69-79). Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politécnica de València. 

Pastor, R. M. S. y López, Ó. C. (2017). Acercar la flipped classroom al aula de música universitaria mediante el uso de aplicaciones para realizar y gestionar vídeos. Percepción y valoración de los estudiantes. European Scientific Journal, 13(1), 89–101. doi:http://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n1p89

Perdomo, W. (2016). Estudio de evidencias de aprendizaje significativo en un aula bajo el modelo Flipped Classroom. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 55, 1–17. doi:http://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2016.55.618

Pintor Holguín, E., Gargantilla Madera, P., Herreros Ruiz-Valdepeñas, B. y López del Hierro, M. (2014). Kahoot en docencia: una alternativa practica a los clickers. Presentado en las XI Jornadas Internacionales de Innovación Universitaria. Educar para transformar (págs. 322-329). 

Pueo, B., Jimenez-Olmedo, J. M., Penichet-Tomas, A. y Carbonell-Martinez, J. A. (2017). Aplicación de la herramienta EDpuzzle en entornos de aprendizaje individuales dentro del aula. En R. Roig-Vila (ed.). Investigación en docencia universitaria. Diseñando el futuro a partir de la innovación educativa. Barcelona: Octaedro. 

Singh, V., Abdellahi, S., Maher, M. Lou y  Latulipe, C. (2016). The video collaboratory aas a learning environment. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’16) (págs. 352–357). http://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844588

LEARNING ANALYTICS IN EDUCATION

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

How to Cite

López-Rodríguez, M. I., & Barac, M. (2019). Student Appraisal of the Use of Clickers and Video Tutorials in Higher Education. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, (22), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.22.14582
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1153
  • PDF (Español)
    645
  • EPUB (Español)
    204
  • XML (Español)
    105
  • HTML (Español)
    270

Issue

No. 22 (2019)

Section

ARTICLES

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Universitat de València is the editor of Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) and retains the copyright of all that is published in the journal, while it allows and favours reuse under a copyleft license.
  2. The originals published in this journal are – unless otherwise specified – under a Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) encourages authors to disseminate and give visibility to their research published in this journal. For this, REALIA wishes to inform that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  2. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
  3. Self-archive: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) to promote greater visibility and citation, with an acknowledgement of its first publication in this journal.

Metrics