Design of a Support System for the Social Regulation of Learning in xMOOC

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.23.15914

Keywords:

Learning design, learning regulation, self-regulation, co-regulation, socially shared regulation, MOOC

Abstract

This research aims at studying the processes of learning regulation in xMOOC environments, attending to both the individual and social dimensions of learning. Specifically, it attempts to analyze how the processes of self-regulation, co-regulation and socially shared regulation can be supported and promoted in open and massive learning contexts to achieve a deeper learning. To this end, a design-based research model is applied to allow a direct intervention in pedagogical practice, through a cyclic process of four stages: design, intervention, evaluation and reflection and redesign of a support system for the regulation of learning in an xMOOC. This paper presents the first iteration of the research together with the results of semi-structured interviews with some participants. First, we present the theoretical foundations of the design that have been applied to the proposed regulation support system as a result of a comprehensive literatura review. Next, we describe the implementation of the system, composed of a set of promptsstrategically administered into an xMOOC on gamification. Then, we present the results, among which we highlight the diverse use of the promptsmade by the participants and the challenges to activate traces of social orientation and reflection in a learning environment of the characteristics of an xMOOC. Finally, some conclusions and recommendations for the design of learning regulation and practice in xMOOC are drawn.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, T., y McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive Pedagogies and Technologies in Universities. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 380–389. Descargado de http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.298.6543&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Bannert, M. (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts: A discussion. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.139

Bannert, M., y Reimann, P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40(1), 193–211. Descargado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/43575195 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9167-4

Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Kou, X., Xu, S., y Sheu, F. R. (2015). Understanding the Self-Directed Online Learning Preferences, Goals, Achievements, and Challenges of MIT OpenCourseWare Subscribers. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 349–365. 

Bouchard, P. (2009). Pedagogy without a teacher: What are the limits? International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 6(2), 13–22. 

Clarà, M., y Barbera, E. (2013). Learning online: massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology, 34, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770428

Clarà, M., y Barberà, E. (2014). Three problems with the connectivist conception of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12040

Conole, G. (2015). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39, 1–17. Descargado de https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/234221

Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3). Art. 18.. http://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18

Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., y García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). From massive access to cooperation: lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/ cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(24), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0024-z

Fontana, R. P., Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., y Margaryan, A. (2015). Measuring self-regulated learning in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12046

García-Peñalvo, F. J., Fidalgo-Blanco, A., y Sein-Echaluce, M. L. (2018). An adaptive hybrid MOOC model: Disrupting the MOOC concept in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.012

Guàrdia, L., Maina, M., y Sangrà, A. (2013). MOOC Design Principles. A Pedagogical Approach from the Learner’s Perspective. eLearning Papers, 33, 1–6. Descargado de http://hdl.handle.net/10609/41681

Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., y Miller, M. (2011). Self-Regulated, Co-Regulated, and Socially Shared Regulation of Learning. En B. Zimmerman y D. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. 

Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problema-solving scenarios. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 38–52. 

Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Hadwin, A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Miller, M., y Laru, J. (2016). Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual-and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 263–280. Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9238-2

Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., … Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1

Kaplan, J., Montalembert, M. D., Laurent, P., y Fenouillet, F. (2017). ERICA- an instrument to measure individual and collective regulation of learning. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2017.01.001

Kop, R., y Fournier, H. (2011). New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 7(2), 1–18. Descargado de https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/accepted/ ?id=c4dc46c9-ef59-46b8-af01-4a7fec44b023 

Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., y Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003

Littlejohn, A., y Milligan, C. (2015). Designing MOOCs for professional learners: Tools and patterns to encourage self-regulated learning. eLearning Papers, 42, 1–10. Descargado de http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/46385

Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., y Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high-and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.082

Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., y Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005

McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., y Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Charlottetown, Canada: University of Price Edward Island. Descargado de https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/archive/MOOC_Final.pdf

McCaslin, M., y Good, T. L. (1996). The informal curriculum. En B. Berliner y R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 622–670). Macmillan Library Reference Usa/ Prentice Hall International. McCaslin, M., y Hickey, D. T. (2001). Educational psychology, social constructivism, and educational practice: A case of emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_8

Milligan, C., y Littlejohn, A. (2014). Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1855

Molenaar, I., y Järvelä, S. (2014).Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9114-2

Morris, R., Hadwin, A. F., Gress, C. L., Miller, M., Fior, M., Church, H., y Winne, P. H. (2010). Designing roles, scripts, and prompts to support CSCL in gStudy. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.001

Osuna-Acedo, S., Marta-Lazo, C., y Frau-Meigs, D. (2018). De sMOOC a tMOOC, el aprendizaje hacia la transferencia profesional: El proyecto europeo ECO. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, 55, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-10

Panadero, E., y Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203.https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226

Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., y Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2018). Tools to Support Self-Regulated Learning in Online Environments: Literature Review. En V. Pammer-Schindler, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, H. Drachsler, R. Elferink, y M. Scheffel (Series Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning. EC-TEL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 11082, pp. 16–30). Cham: Springer. 

Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado-Mahauad, J. J., Sapunar-Opazo, D., y Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2017). NoteMyProgress: A tool to support learners’ self-regulated learning strategies in MOOC environments. En E. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, y M. Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.), Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. EC-TEL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10474, pp. 460–466). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_43

Powell, S., y Yuan, L. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Descargado de https://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf 

Schunk, D. H., y Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1

Tschofen, C., y Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1143

Volet, S., Summers, M., y Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? . Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001

Wirth, J. (2009). Guest Editorial: Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.91

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. En M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press. Handbook of self-regulation. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

Downloads

Published

2019-12-20

How to Cite

Garcia, I., Barberà, E., & Maina, M. (2019). Design of a Support System for the Social Regulation of Learning in xMOOC. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, (23), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.23.15914
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1177
  • PDF (Español)
    483
  • EPUB (Español)
    71
  • HTML (Español)
    130
  • XML (Español)
    104

Issue

No. 23 (2019)

Section

THEMATIC ISSUES

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Universitat de València is the editor of Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) and retains the copyright of all that is published in the journal, while it allows and favours reuse under a copyleft license.
  2. The originals published in this journal are – unless otherwise specified – under a Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) encourages authors to disseminate and give visibility to their research published in this journal. For this, REALIA wishes to inform that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  2. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
  3. Self-archive: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) to promote greater visibility and citation, with an acknowledgement of its first publication in this journal.

Metrics

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.