Self-assessment report as a formative tool for football referees. A case study.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.25.17453

Keywords:

formación permanente, retroalimentación formativa, autoevaluación formativa, árbitros de fútbol

Abstract

In this article we present the results of an evaluative study of an educational practice that focused on the training of participating referees at an international football tournament. The aim was to provide referees with a self-assessment instrument for analyzing and evaluating their refereeing performances at the tournament. The instrument also provided the teaching team with a source of information for detecting the referees’ daily needs and facilitating dialogical feedback processes in the context of a formative evaluation. Feedback was conducted at training meetings characterized by a participative, interactive and collaborative methodology in which video was used as a fundamental didactic resource. This case study employed a range of complementary methodological, qualitative and quantitative techniques and instruments. We analyzed 371 self-assessment reports produced after the matches by the 28 participating referees and evaluated the usefulness and contributions of the self-assessment tool. We also evaluated the referees’ level of satisfaction with the training proposal by analyzing their responses to a questionnaire and holding discussions with their trainers. The results revealed a high level of satisfaction and acceptance of both the instrument and the methodology developed at the work meetings. They also highlight the value of video content as teaching material, the quality of the feedback received, and the participatory, interactive and collaborative approach adopted at the sessions. This proposal is intended to be transferable to other situations and training contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

David Recio Moreno, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED).

Doctorando en Educación. Personal Investigador en Formación. Departamento de Didáctica, Organización Escolar y Didácticas Especiales. Facultad de Educación. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED).

Tiberio Feliz Murias, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED). 

Profesor Titular. Departamento de Didáctica, Organización Escolar y Didácticas Especiales. Facultad de Educación. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED). 

References

Armenteros, M., y Benítez, A. J. (2011). The Integration of Educational Technology into the Training for Refereeing in Elite Football: The Use of the “Interactive Video Test”. Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes(105), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2011/3).105.01

 

Armenteros, M., Benítez, A. J., y Curca, D. G. (2011). El trivial interactivo como recurso educativo para el aprendizaje de las reglas de juego del fútbol. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 38, 35–48. Descargado de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/pixel/ article/view/61415

 

Armenteros, M., Benítez, A. J., y Curca, D. G. (2013). Interactive Trivia of Laws of the Game as a Resource for Training FIFA Football Referees. En H. H. Yang y S. Wang (Eds.), Cases on Formal and Informal E-Learning Environments: Opportunities and Practices (pp. 200–214). IGI Global. https://doi.org//10.4018/978-1-4666-1930-2

 

Armenteros, M., Benítez, A. J., Fernández, M., la Vega, R. D., Sillero-Quintana, M., y Sánchez- Cid, M. (2019). Collaborative learning methods and multimedia tools for the education and training of instructors: the case of FIFA referee technical instructors. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(5), 395–409. Descargado de https:// www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJILT-07-2017-0061/full/html

 

Armenteros, M., Benítez, A. J., Flores, R., Sillero-Quintana, M., Sánchez-Cid, M., y Simón, J. A. (2018). The training of soccer assistant referees beyond on-field experience: the use of the Interactive Video Test. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 17 (2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2018-0009

 

Armenteros, M., Benítez, A. J., y Sillero, M. (2009). Advantages of Applying Video to Interactive Auto-Evaluation: A Model used for the Training of Referees and Instructors of the Fédération Internationale of Football Association (FIFA) and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA). Proceeding of Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications (pp. 13–15).

 

Armenteros, M., Domínguez, A., Fernández, M., y Benítez, A. J. (2016). The Video Database for Teaching and Learning in Football Refereeing. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10(9), 3134–3139. https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.1126517

 

Armenteros, M., Liaw, S. S., Fernández, M., Flores-Díaz, R., y Arteaga-Sánchez, R. (2013). Surveying FIFA instructors’ behavioral intention toward the Multimedia Teaching Materials. Computers & Education, 61, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.010

 

Armenteros, M., Liaw, S. S., Sánchez-Franco, M. J., Fernández, M., y Arteaga-Sánchez, R. (2017). Analysis of FIFA referees and assistant referees’ motivational factors towards the Multimedia Teaching Materials. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 841– 872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9460-y

 

Arribas, M. C. M. (2004). Diseño y validación de cuestionarios. Matronas Profesión, 5(17), 23–29.

 

Cano, E. (2014). Análisis de las investigaciones sobre feedback: aportes para su mejora en el marco del EEES. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 66(4), 9–24. Descargado de https:// recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/BORDON/article/view/Bordon.2014.66402

 

Cardoso, S. M., Travassos, B., y Oliveira, E. P. (2020). Desenvolvimento de carreiras e perceção de fatores para a excelência do árbitro de futebol em Portugal. Retos(37), 694–701. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.74350

 

Carless, D. (2012). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. En D. Boud y E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in Higher and Professional Education (pp. 90–103). London: Routledge.

 

Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Londres & Nueva York: Routledge.

 

CTA. (2018). Guía para Delegados de Partido e Informadores de 2ªDivisión B. Descargado de https://bit.ly/3kgruyt

 

Dosseville, F., y Laborde, S. (2015). Introduction to the special issue: Officials in sports. Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité, 87 , 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/ 2015006

 

Escobar-Pérez, J., y Cuervo-Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances En Medición, 6(1), 27–36. Descargado de http://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/psicometria/files/7113/8574/5708/Articulo3_Juicio_de_expertos_27-36.pdf

 

Gibbs, G., y Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–31. Descargado de http:// eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/3609

 

González-Oya, J. (2005). Reflexiones sobre la formación del árbitro: El papel de la psicopedagogía en el sistema educativo arbitral. Revista Galego-Portuguesa De Psicoloxía e Educación, 10(12), 187–194. Descargado de https://core.ac.uk/download/ pdf/61900599.pdf

 

Hancock, D. J., Rix-Lièvre, G., y Côté, J. (2015). Citation network analysis of research on sport officials: a lack of interconnectivity. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2015.1022202

 

Hattie, J., y Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

 

IFAB. (2019). Reglas de Juego 2019-2020. Descargado de https://bit.ly/2GRxGzq

 

Liu, N. F., y Carless, D.    (2006).     Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13562510600680582

 

Nicol, D. (2007). Principles of good assessment and feedback: Theory and practice. REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility.


Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559

 

Nicol, D. (2011). Good designs for written feedback for students. En M. Svinicki y W. J. McKeachie (Eds.), Teaching tips: Strategies, Research and Theories for College and University Teachers (pp. 108–124). Belmont, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

 

Nicol, D., y Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

 

Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gomez, S., y Crook, A. C. (2013). Moving feedback forward: theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 240– 252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.625472

 

Orsmond, P., y Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903201651

 

Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., y Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007

 

Panadero, E., y Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.

 

Panadero, E., y Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872

 

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., y O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007

 

Quinton, S., y Smallbone, T. (2010). Feeding forward: using feedback to promote student reflection and learning- a teacher model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47 (1), 125–135.

 

Recio-Moreno, D., Feliz-Murias, T., y Elorza-Barbajero, J. (2020). La formación de árbitros y asistentes de fútbol desde el enfoque flipped learning. Retos(39), 794–804. https:// doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i39.78222

 

Samuel, R. D., Galily, Y., y Tenenbaum, G. (2017). Who are you, ref? Defining the soccer referee’s career using a change-based perspective. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2015.1079792

 

Serrano, G. P. (1994). Investigación cualitativa. Retos e interrogantes. I. Métodos. Madrid: La Muralla.

 

Stake, R. E. (2005). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata.

 

UEFA. (2019). Refereeing Assistance Programme 2019. Descargado de https://bit.ly/3lnpkOX

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-12-24

How to Cite

Recio Moreno, D., & Feliz Murias, T. (2020). Self-assessment report as a formative tool for football referees. A case study. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, (25), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.25.17453
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    783
  • Documento suplementario (Español)
    1
  • PDF (Español)
    785
  • EPUB (Español)
    130
  • HTML (Español)
    144
  • XML (Español)
    153

Issue

No. 25 (2020)

Section

ARTICLES

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Universitat de València is the editor of Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) and retains the copyright of all that is published in the journal, while it allows and favours reuse under a copyleft license.
  2. The originals published in this journal are – unless otherwise specified – under a Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) encourages authors to disseminate and give visibility to their research published in this journal. For this, REALIA wishes to inform that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  2. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
  3. Self-archive: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) to promote greater visibility and citation, with an acknowledgement of its first publication in this journal.

Metrics

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.