The use of ICTs and artificial intelligence in the revision of the writing process in Valencian public universities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.28.20622

Keywords:

ICALL, ICT, academic writing, higher education, artificial intelligence

Abstract

From the outset the incorporation of ICT and artificial intelligence (AI) in the education field generated a social debate that is still ongoing. One of the most controversial aspects was the introduction of intelligent tutoring and online learning systems. In 2016, the Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030report predicted that these systems would become the norm in classrooms in just fifteen years. Five years since the publication of that report, we need to know the current state of the art. One aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the teacher-recommended use of ICT and artificial intelligence in the writing process and how this technology is actually used by students. Another aim is to determine what type of automated assessment and corrective feedback is applied by teachers and what perception both groups have about the use of ICT and AI. To conduct this study, we designed two ad hoc questionnaires, which were completed by 53 professors and 101 students from the Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV) and the University of Valencia (UV). One result from this research is that while 79% of teachers recommend using ICT, only 61.4% of students follow this recommendation. One conclusion we can draw is that ICT and AI have not yet been fully integrated into language teaching and learning. At the same time, most participants in this study admit that they do not take full advantage of this technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Beatriz Martín Marchante, Universitat Politècnica de València

Profesora Ayudante Doctor en Filología Inglesa Departamento de lingüística Aplicada

References

Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47 (4), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013

Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M.,… Weber, N. (2019). Horizon Report 2019 Higher Education Edition. Descargado de https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/4/2019horizonreport.pdf?la=en&hash=C8E8D444AF372E705FA1BF9D4FF0DD4CC6F0FDD1


Araujo, J. C. (2013). Principales avances en el ámbito de la enseñanza de lenguas asistida por ordenador (ELAO). Ikastorratza, e-Revista de didáctica, 11, 3–92. Descargado de http://www.ehu.eus/ikastorratza/11_alea/elao.pdf


Aretio, L. G. (2021). ¿Podemos fiarnos de la evaluación en los sistemas de educación a distancia y digitales? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, 24(2), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.30223


Bax, S. (2003). CALL-past, present, and future. System, 31(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0346-251X(02)00071-4


Burston, J. (2001). Exploiting the Potential of a Computer-Based Grammar Checker in Conjunction with Self-Monitoring Strategies with Advanced Level Students of French. CALICO Journal, 18(3), 499–515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v18i3.499-515


Chapelle, C. A. (2007). Technology and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistic, 27 , 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070050


Chapelle, C. A., y Sauro, S. (Eds.). (2017). The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.


Dalton, D. W., y Hannafin, M. J. (1987). The effects of word processing on written composition. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(6), 338–342. Descargado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/27540262.


Dudeney, G., y Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. Pearson Longman.


Ferris, D., y Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of second language writing, 10(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1060-3743(01)00039-X


Frase, L. T., Kiefer, K. E., Smith, C. R., y Fox, M. L. (1985). Theory and practice in computer- aided composition. En S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language (pp. 195–210). NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.


González-Rodríguez, L. M., y Álvarez Mosquera, P. (2020). The Impact of Feedback and Explicit Rhetorical Instruction on EFL Students’ Writing Proficiency in Higher Education. Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies, 42(1), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2020-42.1.07


Hamel, M. J. (2010). Prototype d’un dictionnaire électronique de reformulation pour apprenants avancés de français langue seconde. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité. Cahiers de l’Apliut, 29(1), 73–82.


Heift, T., y Vyatkina, N. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 grammar. En and others (Ed.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 26–44).


Kannan, J., y Munday, P. (2018). New trends in second language learning and teaching through the lens of ICT, networked learning, and artificial intelligence. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 76, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.62495


Lavilla, M. (2016). Inteligencia artificial: las tecnologías que cambiarán la educación en 2030 (and others, Ed.). Lee, I. (2014). Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges. Assessing Writing, 19, 1–5. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009


Lee, R. S. (1970). Social attitudes and the computer revolution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/267772


Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford University Press.


MacArthur, C. A. (2009). Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00283.x


Mangisch, G. C., y Mangisch-Spinelli, M. D. R. (2020). El uso de dispositivos móviles como estrategia educativa en la universidad. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 23(1), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.23.1.25065


Muehleisen, V. (1997). Projects using the Internet in college English classes. The Internet TESL journal, 3(6), 1–7. Descargado de http://iteslj.org/Lessons/Muehleisen-Projects.html


Nhu, P. T. T., Keong, T. C., y Wah, L. K. (2018). Exploring teaching English using ICT in Vietnam: The lens of activity theory. International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Sciences, 1(3), 15–29.


Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7 (3), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025


Puentedura, R. (2013). SAMR: Moving from Enhancement to Transformation. Descargado de http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/05/29/SAMREnhancementToTransformation.pdf


Romero, F., Carrió, M. L., y Yang, Q. (2016). Hábitos de consumo TIC de los estudiantes universitarios: estudio comparativo entre China y España. En A. Díez-Mediavilla,V. Brotons, D. Escandell, y J. Rovira (Eds.), Aprendizajes plurilingües y literarios: nuevos enfoques didácticos (pp. 1013–1020). Servicio de Publicaciones UPV. Descargado de http://hdl.handle.net/10045/64942


Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The modern language journal, 85(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 0026-7902.00096


Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? . RELC journal, 23(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300107


Thu-Dang, X. (2013). ICT in foreign language teaching in an innovative university in Vietnam: Current practices and factors affecting ICT use (Tesis Doctoral no publicada). Torrens University, Australia.


Torres, N. V. (2006). How Well are ESL Teachers Being Prepared to Integrate Technology in Their Classroom? Teaching English as Second or Foreign Language e-Journal, 9(4), 1–28.


Warschauer, M., y Kern, R. (2000a). CALL for the 21st Century. IATEFL and ESADE Conference, 2 July, Barcelona, Spain.


Warschauer, M., y Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000b). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524735


Weil, M. M., y Rosen, L. D. (1995). The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in human behavior, 11(1), 95–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(94)00026-E


Wolfe, E. W., Bolton, S., Feltovich, B., y Bangert, A. W. (1996). A study of word processing experience and its effects on student essay writing. Journal of educational computing research, 14(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.2190/XTDU-J5L2-WTPP-91W2


Young, S. S. C. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00049.x


Yunus, M.-M. (2007). Malaysian ESL teachers’ use of ICT in their classrooms: expectations and realities. RECALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 19(1), 79–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344007000614


Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., y Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 39–39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-01-15

How to Cite

Martín Marchante, B. (2022). The use of ICTs and artificial intelligence in the revision of the writing process in Valencian public universities. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, (28), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.28.20622
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    2359
  • PROFESORES Y ESTUDIANTES DE LENGUAS UNIVERSITARIOS ANTE EL USO DE LAS TIC Y LA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL Sin título (Español)
    3
  • PDF (Español)
    1803
  • EPUB (Español)
    366
  • HTML (Español)
    996

Issue

No. 28 (2022)

Section

ARTICLES

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Universitat de València is the editor of Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) and retains the copyright of all that is published in the journal, while it allows and favours reuse under a copyleft license.
  2. The originals published in this journal are – unless otherwise specified – under a Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives (REALIA) encourages authors to disseminate and give visibility to their research published in this journal. For this, REALIA wishes to inform that:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  2. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License: Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
  3. Self-archive: Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) to promote greater visibility and citation, with an acknowledgement of its first publication in this journal.

Metrics

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.